Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,588
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    LopezElliana
    Newest Member
    LopezElliana
    Joined

Significant Ocean Storm March 5-7 2013 Discussion Part II


earthlight

Recommended Posts

When does the next model of importance come out? I guess it's possible that really a verdict won't be in until very late tonight or tomorrow with Long Island/ NYC poised to get anywhere from 1 to 12 inches, right? Just curious too, what is the total projected QPF for KNYC and KJFK? Also, this is at least a 24 hour event if not 36 hours, right? I suppose no verdict is out there yet.

18z GFS, and it's rolling out now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 1.4k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

The 18z GFS gets some better precip into the area but it's warm through hr 36. Keeps the best precip and dynamics offshore. It trended towards the NAM. It was almost there but just a tad too slow with interaction and that kicker or whatever you want to call it doesn't interact in time favorably.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The 18z GFS gets some better precip into the area but it's warm through hr 36. Keeps the best precip and dynamics offshore. It trended towards the NAM. It was almost there but just a tad too slow with interaction and that kicker or whatever you want to call it doesn't interact in time favorably.

That blob is really affecting the precip shield. Still don't trust the GFS because of it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That blob is really affecting the precip shield. Still don't trust the GFS because of it.

For the 2/8 storm the GFS had these same errors right up until the storm started, causing it to have a sheared out mess here when even the radar showed it much differently. The upper air trends are often more reliable.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

matching th 18Z 36 hr with the 12Z 42 hr, there is little if any difference with the placement of the SLP...yet the qpf distribution is vastly different. The mid and upper levels are basically spot on as well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

For the 2/8 storm the GFS had these same errors right up until the storm started, causing it to have a sheared out mess here when even the radar showed it much differently. The upper air trends are often more reliable.

Yep, it's doing the same damn thing. I won't analyze the upper levels, since I'm no weather guru, but the surface looks messed up much like it did for 2/8

Link to comment
Share on other sites

For the 2/8 storm the GFS had these same errors right up until the storm started, causing it to have a sheared out mess here when even the radar showed it much differently. The upper air trends are often more reliable.

It's not good enough at 500 for us. Still way south and east from what would be preferable.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Can anyone explain to my newbie self why the gfs qpf looks so different from the nam?

several reasons: less northern stream interaction, convective feedback issues (improper presentation of precipitation) , differences in the ULL (upper level low), blocking differences, to name a few
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...