Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,609
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    NH8550
    Newest Member
    NH8550
    Joined

Significant Ocean Storm March 5-7 2013 Discussion Part II


earthlight

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 1.4k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Almost everytime it seems like the storms trend southeast in the last 24 hours or so, there's gotta be some sort of defect that can be identified if this repeatedly occurs? Right? It's almost as if you have to expect it. To those who say they always end up a tick n or nw, I virtually never see that happen. Obviously the storm hasn't hit yet but based the history of these models, youd be wise to hedge your bets on a further SE solution within 24 or so hours.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Almost everytime it seems like the storms trend southeast in the last 24 hours or so, there's gotta be some sort of defect that can be identified if this repeatedly occurs? Right? It's almost as if you have to expect it. To those who say they always end up a tick n or nw, I virtually never see that happen. Obviously the storm hasn't hit yet but based the history of these models, youd be wise to hedge your bets on a further SE solution within 24 or so hours.

That's been common this winter mainly and if you are referring to the GFS specifically, historically it rarely does these SE shifts at the last minute quite the opposite actually.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Regardless of the model mayhem today I'd say that the area avg around .5-.6 so 3-6 inches is the way to go

But you do realize a half inch of precip spread out over 48 hours with marginal temps would most likely not yield 3 to 6"? We would not see the dynamic evaporational cooling and accumulations would be slushy during times of steadier/more moderate precipitation.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

But you do realize a half inch of precip spread out over 48 hours with marginal temps would most likely not yield 3 to 6"? We would not see the dynamic evaporational cooling and accumulations would be slushy during times of steadier/more moderate precipitation.

That's absolutely correct. Would yield dusting to 3" at best.

WX/PT

Link to comment
Share on other sites

But you do realize a half inch of precip spread out over 48 hours with marginal temps would most likely not yield 3 to 6"? We would not see the dynamic evaporational cooling and accumulations would be slushy during times of steadier/more moderate precipitation.

It would be showery rain/nonaccumulating snow for most of the day. The absolute furthest thing from exciting-I'd rather have 60 and sunny. If the front end doesn't happen tomorrow night, as far as I'm concerned the chances for accumulating snow are quite slim.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9z SREF mean plume snowfall shows 10.8" at KLGA

Taking away the highest outlier (24.74" lol) and the lowest outlier (1.26") still yields an impressive mean of 9.9"

http://www.spc.noaa.gov/exper/sref/fplumes/index2.php?YMD=20130305&RT=09&PRM=Total-SNO&SID=LGA&INC=ALL&NNC=&max=&min=&mZOOM=4&mLAT=37.77478874678&mLON=-96.042896875&mTYP=roadmap

Can you explain how to use this tool? Been trying to figure it out, but I am having no luck. Thanks.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...