Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,883
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    Ianlor5077
    Newest Member
    Ianlor5077
    Joined

Significant Ocean Storm March 5-7 2013 Discussion Part II


earthlight

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 1.4k
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  On 3/5/2013 at 8:03 PM, YanksFan27 said:

Hour 24 light precip moving in. The surface is really warm.

It seems quicker than the last run? Not surprised it’s warm, thats 1PM which is the peak of the daytime warmth, temps should crash in 2-3 panels.

-skisheep

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 3/5/2013 at 8:08 PM, ace0927 said:

FYI- looking over total qpf of each member of the SREF...only one member (NMB7) is even remotely close to overall QPF distribution...that is incredible.

I’m guessing one camp is big hits, and another is misses?

-skisheep

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 3/5/2013 at 7:51 PM, Kaner587 said:

surface looks similar to the nam-ish and the 850's are below 0 throughout. Too lazy to compare to 09z though lol. Either way if the sref verified it'd be heavy snow for a period that would accumulate. My concern is that the end result will be less precip over a longer period a la the euro.

Thanks, man.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 3/5/2013 at 8:10 PM, Dsnowx53 said:

There is MUCH greater interaction with that "kicker" shortwave this run, making it act as NOT a kicker, helping to pull the storm north. What a difference. 

 

The NAM is a prime example why we want more interaction with that northern "kicker" shortwave. Pretty big hit at hour 30 with a heavy band setting up in NYC into C NJ.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...