Ajdos Posted March 4, 2013 Share Posted March 4, 2013 6km grid spacing WRF-ARW initialized with 02z RAP 4 hour forecast (model start time: 06z) and used 00z NAM for boundary conditions. Morrison MP scheme used as well. All snowfall totals are assuming a 10:1 ratio. Congrats Lake Michigan! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wisconsinwx Posted March 4, 2013 Share Posted March 4, 2013 LOL, would not surprise me at all.. I definitely think you'll see more than that (0.02"). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chicago Storm Posted March 4, 2013 Share Posted March 4, 2013 0z ECMWF QPF text list... LSE: MON 18Z 04-MAR -3.1 -4.4 1019 66 99 0.02 549 534 TUE 00Z 05-MAR -2.1 -3.9 1017 74 98 0.02 549 536 TUE 06Z 05-MAR -2.9 -6.7 1018 84 100 0.04 548 533 TUE 12Z 05-MAR -4.9 -7.7 1018 90 100 0.19 544 530 TUE 18Z 05-MAR -3.7 -9.8 1019 82 97 0.28 540 525 WED 00Z 06-MAR -4.0 -11.3 1022 84 96 0.08 543 525 MSN: TUE 06Z 05-MAR -4.3 -4.5 1019 79 100 0.01 550 535 TUE 12Z 05-MAR -3.1 -5.5 1016 80 100 0.03 547 534 TUE 18Z 05-MAR -2.8 -7.9 1017 86 98 0.20 543 530 WED 00Z 06-MAR -3.5 -10.4 1019 87 96 0.21 542 527 WED 06Z 06-MAR -6.6 -9.2 1023 87 83 0.02 546 529 MKE: TUE 18Z 05-MAR -2.1 -6.5 1016 80 100 0.07 545 532 WED 00Z 06-MAR -2.6 -9.8 1017 81 99 0.17 542 529 WED 06Z 06-MAR -3.6 -8.1 1020 84 95 0.09 546 530 RAC: TUE 18Z 05-MAR -1.9 -5.8 1016 81 99 0.08 545 533 WED 00Z 06-MAR -2.1 -9.8 1017 81 98 0.20 542 529 WED 06Z 06-MAR -2.9 -8.3 1019 84 94 0.11 545 530 WED 12Z 06-MAR -5.6 -7.2 1024 86 76 0.01 549 531 CID: MON 12Z 04-MAR -4.5 -1.2 1016 80 93 0.05 550 538 MON 18Z 04-MAR -1.4 -0.5 1015 81 87 0.05 551 539 TUE 00Z 05-MAR -1.3 -2.0 1014 78 81 0.02 551 540 TUE 06Z 05-MAR -1.3 -3.3 1015 80 100 0.01 550 538 TUE 12Z 05-MAR -2.7 -5.6 1015 93 100 0.18 545 533 TUE 18Z 05-MAR -2.8 -8.7 1017 92 99 0.20 538 525 WED 00Z 06-MAR -3.2 -9.7 1021 84 86 0.05 541 525 DVN: MON 18Z 04-MAR -0.1 -0.9 1016 69 89 0.03 551 539 TUE 00Z 05-MAR -0.5 -1.5 1015 72 85 0.00 552 540 TUE 06Z 05-MAR -1.4 -2.5 1015 74 94 0.00 551 539 TUE 12Z 05-MAR -1.7 -3.8 1014 89 100 0.09 547 536 TUE 18Z 05-MAR -1.5 -7.6 1015 91 98 0.25 540 528 WED 00Z 06-MAR -1.8 -10.2 1019 87 97 0.13 540 525 WED 06Z 06-MAR -4.1 -10.2 1024 84 64 0.01 547 529 STL: TUE 06Z 05-MAR 5.7 1.2 1010 68 50 0.01 555 546 TUE 12Z 05-MAR 3.8 0.7 1011 91 97 0.03 551 542 TUE 18Z 05-MAR 3.5 -5.7 1015 74 30 0.06 544 532 WED 00Z 06-MAR 2.0 -9.0 1018 55 96 0.00 536 521 WED 06Z 06-MAR -1.2 -10.8 1023 72 54 0.01 546 528 PIA: MON 18Z 04-MAR 2.7 -0.4 1016 60 89 0.03 553 540 TUE 00Z 05-MAR 1.8 -1.2 1014 65 77 0.00 553 542 TUE 06Z 05-MAR 0.6 -1.0 1014 65 78 0.00 552 541 TUE 12Z 05-MAR 0.6 -1.5 1012 80 99 0.03 549 539 TUE 18Z 05-MAR 0.2 -5.3 1013 92 99 0.17 543 532 WED 00Z 06-MAR -1.1 -9.6 1016 90 99 0.13 538 525 WED 06Z 06-MAR -3.0 -9.8 1021 84 88 0.04 546 529 RFD: TUE 12Z 05-MAR -1.7 -4.3 1015 77 100 0.02 548 537 TUE 18Z 05-MAR -1.7 -5.8 1014 89 99 0.22 543 532 WED 00Z 06-MAR -2.9 -9.7 1017 88 99 0.27 541 527 WED 06Z 06-MAR -4.8 -9.1 1021 84 83 0.05 546 529 DKB: TUE 12Z 05-MAR -1.1 -3.5 1014 71 100 0.01 549 538 TUE 18Z 05-MAR -1.6 -4.7 1014 89 99 0.20 544 533 WED 00Z 06-MAR -2.7 -9.7 1016 90 100 0.30 540 528 WED 06Z 06-MAR -4.3 -9.0 1020 85 79 0.10 545 529 DPA: TUE 18Z 05-MAR -1.6 -4.0 1014 87 100 0.16 544 533 WED 00Z 06-MAR -2.4 -9.7 1015 89 99 0.34 541 529 WED 06Z 06-MAR -3.7 -8.9 1019 85 82 0.14 545 530 UGN: TUE 18Z 05-MAR -1.8 -4.9 1015 85 98 0.12 545 533 WED 00Z 06-MAR -2.0 -9.9 1016 83 98 0.28 542 529 WED 06Z 06-MAR -3.0 -8.6 1019 85 91 0.13 545 530 WED 12Z 06-MAR -5.9 -6.9 1024 86 76 0.01 550 531 ORD: TUE 18Z 05-MAR -1.6 -3.7 1014 86 100 0.14 545 534 WED 00Z 06-MAR -1.8 -9.6 1015 87 98 0.37 541 529 WED 06Z 06-MAR -2.8 -9.0 1018 85 87 0.16 545 530 WED 12Z 06-MAR -5.9 -6.4 1023 86 75 0.01 550 532 MDW: TUE 18Z 05-MAR -1.2 -3.4 1014 83 100 0.13 545 534 WED 00Z 06-MAR -1.6 -9.1 1014 88 98 0.37 541 530 WED 06Z 06-MAR -1.9 -9.1 1018 87 86 0.16 544 530 WED 12Z 06-MAR -4.4 -6.1 1023 85 78 0.01 550 532 DEC: MON 18Z 04-MAR 4.7 0.4 1016 52 83 0.02 554 541 TUE 00Z 05-MAR 4.5 -0.8 1013 56 59 0.00 555 544 TUE 06Z 05-MAR 3.8 0.5 1013 54 64 0.00 554 543 TUE 12Z 05-MAR 1.8 0.2 1011 82 91 0.03 551 541 TUE 18Z 05-MAR 1.7 -3.4 1011 94 99 0.08 545 536 WED 00Z 06-MAR -0.4 -9.3 1014 82 95 0.09 536 525 WED 06Z 06-MAR -1.9 -9.8 1019 80 94 0.05 543 528 VPZ: TUE 18Z 05-MAR -0.6 -2.5 1013 72 100 0.09 547 536 WED 00Z 06-MAR -2.2 -7.7 1013 90 100 0.39 541 531 WED 06Z 06-MAR -2.1 -8.1 1016 90 92 0.21 543 530 WED 12Z 06-MAR -1.3 -5.9 1020 85 98 0.01 549 533 WED 18Z 06-MAR -0.4 -4.8 1025 86 71 0.02 554 534 LAF: TUE 18Z 05-MAR 1.4 -0.8 1011 79 99 0.10 548 539 WED 00Z 06-MAR -0.4 -6.9 1010 94 100 0.27 540 532 WED 06Z 06-MAR -1.6 -8.7 1014 92 96 0.15 541 530 WED 12Z 06-MAR -2.2 -5.5 1020 88 95 0.03 549 533 WED 18Z 06-MAR -1.4 -5.0 1025 85 68 0.01 555 535 IND: TUE 12Z 05-MAR 2.0 0.7 1013 50 91 0.01 553 542 TUE 18Z 05-MAR 1.4 0.7 1010 88 97 0.11 550 541 WED 00Z 06-MAR 0.7 -5.5 1008 99 98 0.19 541 534 WED 06Z 06-MAR -2.4 -8.2 1012 91 97 0.15 539 529 WED 12Z 06-MAR -2.5 -6.5 1018 86 86 0.09 547 533 WED 18Z 06-MAR -0.2 -5.7 1024 81 71 0.01 554 535 THU 00Z 07-MAR -0.8 -4.8 1027 86 34 0.01 557 536 OKK: TUE 18Z 05-MAR 2.0 -0.3 1011 63 99 0.05 549 540 WED 00Z 06-MAR -0.4 -5.9 1009 90 99 0.24 542 534 WED 06Z 06-MAR -2.1 -7.5 1012 91 97 0.24 540 531 WED 12Z 06-MAR -3.6 -6.0 1018 87 89 0.09 548 533 FWA: TUE 18Z 05-MAR 0.5 -1.5 1014 57 98 0.01 549 538 WED 00Z 06-MAR -2.9 -5.8 1011 79 100 0.12 543 535 WED 06Z 06-MAR -2.0 -6.6 1011 89 100 0.36 541 532 WED 12Z 06-MAR -2.8 -4.9 1017 86 97 0.13 547 534 MKG: WED 00Z 06-MAR -1.0 -7.0 1016 78 95 0.03 544 531 WED 06Z 06-MAR -3.4 -7.1 1017 85 82 0.03 545 531 GRR: WED 00Z 06-MAR -2.5 -5.8 1015 80 98 0.02 544 532 WED 06Z 06-MAR -4.6 -6.2 1017 87 87 0.05 544 531 WED 12Z 06-MAR -2.8 -6.1 1020 88 30 0.01 548 532 BTL: WED 00Z 06-MAR -0.5 -6.7 1013 73 100 0.04 544 534 WED 06Z 06-MAR -4.1 -5.9 1015 85 98 0.13 543 532 WED 12Z 06-MAR -2.6 -5.5 1019 87 43 0.02 548 533 PTK: WED 06Z 06-MAR -2.3 -5.0 1013 83 48 0.01 544 533 DET: WED 06Z 06-MAR -1.5 -4.7 1012 79 58 0.01 544 534 WED 12Z 06-MAR -1.6 -5.1 1016 78 33 0.01 546 533 DTW: WED 06Z 06-MAR -1.5 -4.7 1012 80 81 0.02 544 534 WED 12Z 06-MAR -1.8 -4.9 1016 79 46 0.02 546 533 TOL: WED 00Z 06-MAR -2.6 -3.7 1012 71 100 0.01 546 536 WED 06Z 06-MAR -1.5 -4.8 1010 84 99 0.16 542 534 WED 12Z 06-MAR -1.6 -5.1 1015 81 77 0.11 546 534 WED 18Z 06-MAR 2.3 -5.4 1021 71 57 0.01 551 535 DAY: TUE 18Z 05-MAR 3.0 0.2 1012 61 100 0.06 552 542 WED 00Z 06-MAR 1.3 -1.2 1007 88 100 0.15 545 540 WED 06Z 06-MAR -1.6 -5.2 1006 94 100 0.47 538 533 WED 12Z 06-MAR -1.7 -5.8 1011 91 95 0.24 543 534 WED 18Z 06-MAR -0.3 -5.4 1020 88 68 0.03 552 536 HAO: TUE 18Z 05-MAR 2.9 1.2 1011 73 97 0.07 552 543 WED 00Z 06-MAR 1.6 -1.3 1006 99 99 0.22 544 539 WED 06Z 06-MAR -0.9 -6.0 1006 93 100 0.47 537 532 WED 12Z 06-MAR -1.5 -6.5 1012 88 96 0.20 543 533 WED 18Z 06-MAR 0.5 -5.6 1020 79 75 0.03 552 536 CMH: WED 00Z 06-MAR 3.2 -0.7 1007 60 100 0.02 547 542 WED 06Z 06-MAR 0.6 -2.7 1003 95 100 0.40 539 537 WED 12Z 06-MAR 1.0 -4.3 1007 93 84 0.23 542 536 WED 18Z 06-MAR 3.2 -5.9 1017 74 83 0.04 550 536 THU 00Z 07-MAR -0.4 -5.7 1023 91 77 0.01 553 535 CLE: WED 06Z 06-MAR 0.9 -2.3 1007 79 100 0.04 543 537 WED 12Z 06-MAR -0.1 -5.4 1013 90 97 0.23 544 534 WED 18Z 06-MAR 2.5 -5.6 1019 74 62 0.03 550 535 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cyclone77 Posted March 4, 2013 Share Posted March 4, 2013 Euro "only" drops about 5" here, but overall looks pretty similar to the 12z with the larger scale features. Wouldn't be shocked to receive less than my 6-8" call, but the Euro looks a tad too dry to me. I'm guessing the 12z version beefs up QPF again, similar to today's 12z. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
snowlover2 Posted March 4, 2013 Share Posted March 4, 2013 I'll gladly take 7-8". Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hoosier Posted March 4, 2013 Share Posted March 4, 2013 Euro is kinda cheap with precip in the main band. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mimillman Posted March 4, 2013 Share Posted March 4, 2013 Euro looks good. I'll up my call to 4-7 over the Chicago area. Final. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mimillman Posted March 4, 2013 Share Posted March 4, 2013 Slightly below today's forecast low. Models might be underestimating the resilience of the meager snowpack we have left. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ajdos Posted March 4, 2013 Share Posted March 4, 2013 6z Nam looks much better for S/Mi.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Geos Posted March 4, 2013 Share Posted March 4, 2013 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thundersnow12 Posted March 4, 2013 Share Posted March 4, 2013 0/6z NAM run comparions of snow totals/QPF Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thundersnow12 Posted March 4, 2013 Share Posted March 4, 2013 zoomed in 6z NAM total QPF, showing lake enhancement nicely. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BowMeHunter Posted March 4, 2013 Share Posted March 4, 2013 looks like nam picked up on the dry air early in wisconsin.. tough call for mke office. probably low end warning event at best when you weigh in the euro.. I'd go strong advisory wording. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
snowlover2 Posted March 4, 2013 Share Posted March 4, 2013 6z GFS has a small shift south. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BowMeHunter Posted March 4, 2013 Share Posted March 4, 2013 def tossing the nam qpf here after seeing gfs. looks like a pretty easy advisory event for se wisc and 5-8" down south. back to bed.. should of just stayed in bed as this was pretty much written in stone with the euro speaking loud and clear up here unless your the weenies at MKE office. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BowMeHunter Posted March 4, 2013 Share Posted March 4, 2013 surprised la crosse still going 10-13" 10 seems high side if lucky to me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BowMeHunter Posted March 4, 2013 Share Posted March 4, 2013 still going 7-9 for racine and kenosha.. warning here for 3-5 tomorrow and a weenie inch on both ends. 3-5" total would be my call for the city and advisory. They're the pro's though and I'm just a budget brand weenier. Good luck LAF, I hope my 4" call bust low down there Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kevlon62 Posted March 4, 2013 Share Posted March 4, 2013 LOT hoists warnings for basically Cook/I-88 counties north from 3 a.m. Tuesday to midnight Wednesday (Tuesday night). Text mentions 6-9 with locally higher amounts (I'll take those here).Here we go. Now to decide if I take Tuesday off or wait and see if we simply close. Either way I ain't going in. Trails are going to be something for the first full week of March. About two years coming. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Harry Posted March 4, 2013 Author Share Posted March 4, 2013 Time for me to punt! Congrats to those between i80 and i70. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
A-L-E-K Posted March 4, 2013 Share Posted March 4, 2013 weenie map incoming. still snowing in cook county Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
snowstormcanuck Posted March 4, 2013 Share Posted March 4, 2013 Got no problems with a miss to the SW but the way the GFS (and even the NAM now) are re-curving the storm to slam SNE stings a bit. Horseshoe shaped QPF holes FTL. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
A-L-E-K Posted March 4, 2013 Share Posted March 4, 2013 LOT sounds leery of amounts in their eastern CWA including Chicago...also don't sound too jazzed about LE Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AppsRunner Posted March 4, 2013 Share Posted March 4, 2013 CLE's watch here says 6-9", with the heavier amounts MBY and south, while the last I saw from a local met was 1-3" for Toledo and 2-4" here. Oh, consistency Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gosaints Posted March 4, 2013 Share Posted March 4, 2013 Gonna go with 8.4 imby.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AppsRunner Posted March 4, 2013 Share Posted March 4, 2013 It is a tough setup. I suspect there won't be a lot settled by this time tomorrow yet. Moisture transport for the Atlantic could be the surprise variable in Ohio. Really the main difference is how the precip shield eventually pivots back to the east. The NAM/GFS take it basically due east across the route 6 corridor here while the GGEM/UKM and to some extent the ECMWF go ESE with the heaviest precip. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
A-L-E-K Posted March 4, 2013 Share Posted March 4, 2013 HPC looks to be leaning south...which is great for MBY. First time being on the favored northern edge of the good snows all winter. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jonger Posted March 4, 2013 Share Posted March 4, 2013 Towel thrown for SE Michigan. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dmc76 Posted March 4, 2013 Share Posted March 4, 2013 Towel thrown for SE Michigan. We were never in the game. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Trent Posted March 4, 2013 Share Posted March 4, 2013 Really the main difference is how the precip shield eventually pivots back to the east. The NAM/GFS take it basically due east across the route 6 corridor here while the GGEM/UKM and to some extent the ECMWF go ESE with the heaviest precip. For a system less than 36 hours away, the differences in Ohio by most of the model suites are incredible. Take a look at the 6z NMM/ARW ... that keeps NW Ohio and NE Indiana completely dry, with the heaviest swath in SW Ohio. Compare that to the NAM which has the heaviest axis of precip some 150 miles to the north and east in Ohio. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
buckeye Posted March 4, 2013 Share Posted March 4, 2013 It is a tough setup. I suspect there won't be a lot settled by this time tomorrow yet. Moisture transport for the Atlantic could be the surprise variable in Ohio. I agree it's a tough set up and probably a few big surprises and big disappointments. I'm not sure about the Atlantic moisture transport though. Don't you usually need to have a strong high parked north of the coastal low for that to happen....(ie Jan'96) ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.