stormtracker Posted March 3, 2013 Author Share Posted March 3, 2013 :o I like these posts from you. I'm stuck at 63 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EasternUSWX Posted March 3, 2013 Share Posted March 3, 2013 GFS phases some more energy this run again and comes north. .75-1.00" qpf in 6hrs in DC and Baltimore. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NOVAForecaster Posted March 3, 2013 Share Posted March 3, 2013 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chris87 Posted March 3, 2013 Share Posted March 3, 2013 not only holds...it bombs slight shift in orientation of the ULL....saw the same thing in the NAM...starts a bit south in the 0-36hr range, then takes on a slight negative tilt as it approaches the coast...really nice Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ian Posted March 3, 2013 Share Posted March 3, 2013 bullseyed on the gfs again wooo Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stormtracker Posted March 3, 2013 Author Share Posted March 3, 2013 Holy crap. Just saw the later panels. Wow Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PhineasC Posted March 3, 2013 Share Posted March 3, 2013 GFS looks really weak through hr. 63. Good analysis. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ger Posted March 3, 2013 Share Posted March 3, 2013 Well, I'd need 15 to get to 27 average, but not sure I'd want 15 if its a 5-7 to 1 snow.....trees, trees, trees! A good 6-10 would thrill me at this point. I'm getting that feeling I get when a potential Big one is lurking. 6-10 isn't enough Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MN Transplant Posted March 3, 2013 Share Posted March 3, 2013 DC FTMFW NAM-esque QPF. What a bulls-eye. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
swimmatte Posted March 3, 2013 Share Posted March 3, 2013 GFS looks really weak through hr. 63. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
yoda Posted March 3, 2013 Share Posted March 3, 2013 Excellent placement of the h5 at 69 and 72... wow Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stormtracker Posted March 3, 2013 Author Share Posted March 3, 2013 DC FTMFW The bullseye is literally DC Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ian Posted March 3, 2013 Share Posted March 3, 2013 sick run.. 18" for all. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Grothar of Herndon Posted March 3, 2013 Share Posted March 3, 2013 Crushed!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kmlwx Posted March 3, 2013 Share Posted March 3, 2013 GFS looks really weak through hr. 63. You posted this about a NAM run today too... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MN Transplant Posted March 3, 2013 Share Posted March 3, 2013 ~2.25 for DCA? Looks like it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
weatherMA Posted March 3, 2013 Share Posted March 3, 2013 Find DC on this map! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
snowdude Posted March 3, 2013 Share Posted March 3, 2013 You posted this about a NAM run today too... So maybe he should stop posting? love you Randy! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
usedtobe Posted March 3, 2013 Share Posted March 3, 2013 ~2.25 for DCA? Looks pretty similar to the NAM, wow! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EasternUSWX Posted March 3, 2013 Share Posted March 3, 2013 That low positioning is perfect. Hopefully 0Z with that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
swimmatte Posted March 3, 2013 Share Posted March 3, 2013 Dumps .72 in 6 hours with surface temp of .8 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ian Posted March 3, 2013 Share Posted March 3, 2013 gfs hits new england nice too .. matt ftw Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kmlwx Posted March 3, 2013 Share Posted March 3, 2013 he isnt entirely wrong though it is poor analysis...we dont want a compact bowling ball that has no chance to rounding the corner...ala euro Yeah no doubt. But it just goes along with poor model analysis as you said. Crushing run verbatim. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TalcottWx Posted March 3, 2013 Share Posted March 3, 2013 I'm confident in this system. You haven't seen me post that all winter. Banding would be punishing. Don't worry about warm ground/sticking. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stormtracker Posted March 3, 2013 Author Share Posted March 3, 2013 Looks pretty similar to the NAM, wow! Wes, can you talk about the wind situation with the GFS depiction? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
weatherMA Posted March 3, 2013 Share Posted March 3, 2013 gfs hits new england nice too .. matt ftw Might have to edit your map from the other day about March. BOS gets 1'+ this run. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NOVAForecaster Posted March 3, 2013 Share Posted March 3, 2013 Sooooo... what was that about the NAM being a huge outlier again...? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PDIII Posted March 3, 2013 Share Posted March 3, 2013 sick run.. 18" for all. I am pretty sure that would break all time record for the month of march... destroy them in fact... 93 was like 10-12 for the major cities.. and I think something back in the forties was about the same.. if the GFS or NAM verified... it would be something you only see in once in a century.. for the March at least. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
I-83 BLIZZARD Posted March 3, 2013 Share Posted March 3, 2013 Looks pretty similar to the NAM, wow! If Wes is in Weenie mode we are in business! Is the vort over land yet? This is obviously the result of some better data sampling. Gotta think the Euro OP will at least shift north. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PDIII Posted March 3, 2013 Share Posted March 3, 2013 Dumps .72 in 6 hours with surface temp of .8 What time of day.. is that the Wed Night period or Wed during the day? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.