Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,752
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    Sasonah
    Newest Member
    Sasonah
    Joined

The March 6 Storm- The (last) Great White Hope


stormtracker

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 1.7k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Who cares if the probability maps are computer-generated? The model runs themselves are computer-generated. It is just another product to look at.

It matters because when weenies look at the board they'll see it and think "oh gee, the GFS has support from the HPC" when really it's just the HPC's direct interpretation of the GFS.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

from what I see on WunderMaps (great btw, never knew those existed before) because it is so far upstream from the ULL, the jet is oriented in such a way it becomes a kicker, and increases the forward momentum of the bowling ball.

 

Yep, and I agree with HM too. He brings up a good point. I just don't know if I believe the exact depiction of the euro op.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

HPC or WPC now can support whatever model, but it does not mean you toss the others..especially if there is no way to tell it does not make sense. We are pretty much where we expect to be 72-90hrs out. Little nuances in the flow have a big impact..especially if 50 miles means everything.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The GFS is locked in? 12 hours ago it was showing the heaviest axis of snow 75-100 miles

South.

I misstated what I intended to say...sorry. I meant the GFS and GEFS mean seem to be locked in with each other's solution, not to say trends aren't still ongoing. Last night's 00/06Z GFS nevertheless still hit the DC area pretty hard...that's the part that hasn't changed as much.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

From about Tuesday Night into Thursday Morning we are piling water into the Mid Atlantic shore. I am not an expert on this stuff, esp. for your area in the Chesapeake/Tidewater etc. But that is a long time to be piling water. At least, astronomically, things aren't bad like they were with Sandy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

HPC or WPC now can support whatever model, but it does not mean you toss the others..especially if there is no way to tell it does not make sense. We are pretty much where we expect to be 72-90hrs out. Little nuances in the flow have a big impact..especially if 50 miles means everything.

Translation for weenies:   Everything is on hold until the EURO comes out after 1 am.

 

(unless the American models cave to to the EURO this eve). 

 

Conventional wisdom:  a blend between the GFS and EURO is probably a proper baseline and will allow changes

in either direction to not be jarring.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The euro ensembles are a bit more progressive then the op...IOW they don't occlude as quick as the operational run. They also aren't as bullish in bringing the s/w southeast through lake Huron like the op run had. So all in all at the surface and aloft, when comparing these features at T+84hrs, the ensemble is a little NE of the op. Those features brought up earlier from HM and others are the nuances that need to be watched.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Translation for weenies:   Everything is on hold until the EURO comes out after 1 am.

 

(unless the American models cave to to the EURO this eve). 

 

Conventional wisdom:  a blend between the GFS and EURO is probably a proper baseline and will allow changes

in either direction to not be jarring.

 

Bad translation. It means it's too early to toss one solution over the other. I don't fall in love with the euro op as much as others.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The euro ensembles are a bit more progressive then the op...IOW they don't occlude as quick as the operational run. They also aren't as bullish in bringing the s/w southeast through lake Huron like the op run had. So all in all at the surface and aloft, when comparing these features at T+84hrs, the ensemble is a little NE of the op. Those features brought up earlier from HM and others are the nuances that need to be watched.

 

So does the EURO ensembles lead some credence to the GFS idea?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Bad translation. It means it's too early to toss one solution over the other. I don't fall in love with the euro op as much as others.

Well...a meteorologist has to give some guidance...would you be comfortable going with a GFS/EURO blend

at this time?  I'm not a meteorologist but it strikes me as improbable that either model has a pure solution

at this time but seem to establish reasonable parameters.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well...a meteorologist has to give some guidance...would you be comfortable going with a GFS/EURO blend

at this time?  I'm not a meteorologist but it strikes me as improbable that either model has a pure solution

at this time but seem to establish reasonable parameters.

 

Yeah..probably some sort of blend..I mean as far as a forecasting standpoint goes, at >72hrs out..there isn't a huge reason to lean heavily on one side right now.  Of course for those that are right on the edge like DC...that can be a tough pill to swallow, but you have to think that way.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...