hazwoper Posted March 6, 2013 Share Posted March 6, 2013 Yeah Bliz, there was a second iteration that had even more widespread 4-6" amounts. I think TWC call from this evening that Anthony showed is so poor. Terrible. Must say I am intrigued by this norlun feature for thurs night/Friday that the nam is showing. Not sure if it will be snow or rain though?? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chubbs Posted March 6, 2013 Share Posted March 6, 2013 Getting a little more optimistic about the front-end out this way.. SREF, NAM, and GFS are pushing the initial strong band further N into S PA. Could be a quick several inches near daybreak in NE Md and S Chesco and perhaps into N De+Delco. GFS/NAM/SREF qpf is in the 0.4-0.6" range by 10 AM. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NaoPos Posted March 6, 2013 Share Posted March 6, 2013 RGEM snow totals: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cast4 Posted March 6, 2013 Share Posted March 6, 2013 Getting a little more optimistic about the front-end out this way.. SREF, NAM, and GFS are pushing the initial strong band further N into S PA. Could be a quick several inches near daybreak in NE Md and S Chesco and perhaps into N De+Delco. GFS/NAM/SREF qpf is in the 0.4-0.6" range by 10 AM. yep I'm liking my lanco location for this one. Looks like we get some pretty nice waa bands early. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NaoPos Posted March 6, 2013 Share Posted March 6, 2013 ps, the dark green is .295" inch for conversions sake. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chubbs Posted March 6, 2013 Share Posted March 6, 2013 yep I'm liking my lanco location for this one. Looks like we get some pretty nice waa bands early. You'll do even better. R/S line is going to set up close to here. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
blizzardlover Posted March 6, 2013 Share Posted March 6, 2013 Getting a little more optimistic about the front-end out this way.. SREF, NAM, and GFS are pushing the initial strong band further N into S PA. Could be a quick several inches near daybreak in NE Md and S Chesco and perhaps into N De+Delco. GFS/NAM/SREF qpf is in the 0.4-0.6" range by 10 AM.SPC Meso -- wonder if this area will edge N & E and end up delivering the snow you mention above..MESOSCALE DISCUSSION 0248 NWS STORM PREDICTION CENTER NORMAN OK 0952 PM CST TUE MAR 05 2013 AREAS AFFECTED...ERN WV...PORTIONS OF NRN/WRN VA...A LARGE PART OF MD...WASHINGTON DC...PORTIONS OF FAR SRN PA CONCERNING...HEAVY SNOW VALID 060352Z - 060945Z SUMMARY...SNOW WITH RATES OF 1-1.5 IN/HR WILL SPREAD NEWD ACROSS PARTS OF THE MID ATLANTIC AND CNTRL APPALACHIANS OVERNIGHT. DISCUSSION...AS THE LEADING EDGE OF A STRONG MID-LEVEL PV MAX CONTINUES OVERTAKING A LOW-LEVEL BAROCLINIC ZONE OVER THE CAROLINAS...A SFC LOW IS DEVELOPING ALONG THE ATTENDANT FRONT IN CNTRL NC WHERE PRESSURE FALLS OF 3-4 MB PER 2 HOURS HAVE BEEN NOTED. AS THE SFC LOW TRACKS NEWD/NWD DURING THE NEXT SEVERAL HOURS...A STRENGTHENING 850-700-MB FRONTOGENETIC CIRCULATION WILL SUPPORT INCREASING MESOSCALE ASCENT. IN TURN...PRECIPITATION WILL CONTINUE TO OVERSPREAD THE AREA TONIGHT AMID AN ELEVATED WARM CONVEYOR BELT. WHILE LOW-LEVEL THERMAL PROFILES ARE INITIALLY MARGINAL FOR SNOW FROM THE DC AREA INTO NRN VA...THE COMBINED EFFECTS OF COOLING OWING TO FORCED ASCENT AND WET-BULB/NOCTURNAL EFFECTS SHOULD AID IN LOWERING WET-BULB ZERO HEIGHTS TOWARD THE SFC DURING THE NEXT FEW HOURS. FURTHERMORE...ISALLOBARIC FORCING SHOULD ALLOW LOW-LEVEL FLOW BACK AND BECOME MORE NLY...RESULTING IN COOLER AIR BEING DRAWN INTO THE REGION. AS SUCH...SNOW WILL BECOME THE PREDOMINANT PRECIPITATION TYPE ACROSS THE AREA BY 06Z...WITH SNOW RATES INCREASING TO 1-1.5 IN/HR THEREAFTER. LOCALLY HIGHER RATES MAY OCCUR IN UPSLOPE-FAVORED AREAS AND RIDGETOPS OVER THE CNTRL APPALACHIANS. THESE RATES WILL LIKELY SPREAD NEWD WITH TIME...ROUGHLY IN TANDEM WITH THE TRACK OF THE LOW...REACHING THE DC AREA MORE LIKELY AFTER 08Z. THESE RATES WILL LIKELY CONTINUE THROUGH DAWN. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
famartin Posted March 6, 2013 Share Posted March 6, 2013 RGEM snow totals: 2" at home, I like that Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wolfie09 Posted March 6, 2013 Share Posted March 6, 2013 ggem is north according to the nyc crowd.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MJO812 Posted March 6, 2013 Share Posted March 6, 2013 ggem is north according to the nyc crowd.. Yep. A good bit northwest from 12z. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
snowwors2 Posted March 6, 2013 Share Posted March 6, 2013 Yep. A good bit northwest from 12z. some snow amounts for philly/nw burbs??!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
famartin Posted March 6, 2013 Share Posted March 6, 2013 GEM might be further north... but judging by its temps, it doesn't have a lot of snow on it for PHL (or NYC).... 35 at 12Z, 37 at 18Z, 36 at 0Z, 35 at 6Z at both cities. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Absolute Humidity Posted March 6, 2013 Share Posted March 6, 2013 Yeah FWIW to who ever in Philly, GGEM is like, 30cm. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
famartin Posted March 6, 2013 Share Posted March 6, 2013 For NYC its still less than half an inch and in small increments (less than 0.20"/6 hours). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Absolute Humidity Posted March 6, 2013 Share Posted March 6, 2013 GEM might be further north... but judging by its temps, it doesn't have a lot of snow on it for PHL (or NYC).... 35 at 12Z, 37 at 18Z, 36 at 0Z, 35 at 6Z at both cities. GGEM warm bias at play. I doubt most of that is rain, but hey, this is a horrible Philly winter were talking about. GGEM might be right thermally speaking. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cast4 Posted March 6, 2013 Share Posted March 6, 2013 GGEM warm bias at play. I doubt most of that is rain, but hey, this is a horrible Philly winter were talking about. GGEM might be right thermally speaking. Yeah, I know that the precip map algorithms of the GGEM are always very inaccurate. Other than that I'm not sure. For some odd reason the Ukie also went very far north as well bringing 25 mm into the city. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wolfie09 Posted March 6, 2013 Share Posted March 6, 2013 mount holly 917 pm .NEAR TERM /UNTIL 6 AM WEDNESDAY MORNING/...HOPING A RESEARCH PROJECT COMES OF THIS EVENT AS THERE ARE SOMANY CONFLICTING SIGNALS STILL IN OUR CWA WE DONT KNOW WHERE TOSTART. CAN UNDERSTAND WHY SPRING EQUATIONS ARE CAUSING PROBLEMSWITH MOS GUIDANCE, BUT THE MODELS KEEPING SFC TEMPS WELL ABOVEFREEZING INTO EARLY WED EVENING EXCEPT FOR THE WRF-NMMB WHICHDYNAMIC COOLS TO NEAR FREEZING.WELL AS FOR PCPN VERIFICATION THROUGH 00Z. ALL OF THE MODELS HAD AGOOD HANDLE ON THE AREA PF EXCELLENT MID LEVEL QVEC CONVERGENCEEMANATING FROM THE SFC LOW INTO IL. SINCE MOST OF THIS FELL ASSNOW HARD TO SAY IF THEY WERE WET OR DRY, BUT THE PLACEMENT WASGOOD. WHERE IT WAS RAIN FARTHER TO THE SOUTH, THE CAN GGEM SEEMEDTO VERIFY THE BEST. A BUNCH OF MODELS WERE TOO WET IN SC AND GA,DON`T KNOW IF THIS WAS JUST BEING TOO FAST WITH DEVELOPINGCONVECTION AS THE FRONT IS NOT SLOW AND THERE IS CONVECTION NOW.THE MODELS ARE SLIGHTLY TOO SLOW WITH THE BACK EDGE, WRF-NMMB MOSTGUILTY PARTY. AS FOR THE SFC LOW ITSELF, THE 18Z WRF-NMMB VERIFIEDTHE BEST. ALSO GOOD WITH BAGGINESS OVER WRN NC. ECMWF 2ND BEST,CORRECT LATITUDE, JUST SLIGHTLY SLOW, NOTHING NEW THERE. 00Z RUCNOT GOOD, SFC LOW IS NOT IN OH YET AS 01Z. CAN SEE A CIRCULATIONFORMING AROUND CLT AT 02Z. RAIN/SNOW LINE OUTSIDE OF THE MOUNTAINSWAS AROUND 1295M 1000-850MB NAM THICKNESS.AT 925MB IN THE LOCAL AREA ALL OF THE MODELS WERE TOO COLD, THEWRF-NMMB 6HR FCST AMONG THE COLDEST SOMETIMES BY 2 OR 3C. GFS BESTOVERALL. BOTH BWI AND PHL ACAR FREEZING LEVEL IS CURRENTLY 2500FEET. THIS MAY ALL BE A MOOT POINT AS THERE IS PLENTY OF DRY AIRBETWEEN 925MB AND SFC ON THE 00Z SOUNDINGS. IF ANYTHING, THEMODELS TOO MOIST TOO FAST AT IAD LOOK GOOD AT WAL. AT 850MBCONVERSELY THE MODELS ARE TOO WARM BY AROUND A DEGREE OR SO, THEECMWF OVERALL THE BEST. AT 500MB THERE IS MORE RIDGING OVER THECAROLINAS AND THE CLOSED LOW LOOKS TO BE DIGGING MORE. THE BNAHEIGHT AND TEMPERATURE FORECASTS ARE LAGGING BEHIND.THE LATEST SREF EMPHASIZING TWO AREAS AS BEST POTENTIAL FOR HEAVY(WARNING CRITERIA) SNOW. ONE WHERE CURRENT WARNING IS IN EFFECT,THE SECOND MAX MAY BE IN OCEAN AND MONMOUTH. SREF QPF ISAPPROXIMATELY 50 TO 75 PCT OF OPERATIONAL 18Z WRF-NMMB.WOULD THINK THE 500MB FCST SHORTFALLS WOULD RESULT IN A SHARPERTURN WITH THE 00Z MODEL RUN. AS FOR CHANGES WITH THIS SHORT TERM,BASED ON THE PREV RUC AND HRRR, WE ADDED SOME MORE SNOW TO OUREASTERN SHORE OVERNIGHT. THE TOP DOWN PROCEDURE WE DID WITH THEPREVIOUS UPDATE WAS ALL RAIN. LOOKS LIKE A SHOT OF SNOW FOR MAYBEAN HOUR OR SO WHEN INTENSITY INCREASES LATER. ANY ADJUSTMENTS TOTEMPERATURES WERE BASED ON CURRENT OBS. ITS COLDER TOWARD THECOAST CURRENTLY THAN INLAND. WOULD THINK ONCE THE WINDS START ANDCLOUDS ARRIVE, THEY WILL BUMP UP. http://forecast.weather.gov/product.php?site=NWS&issuedby=PHI&product=AFD&format=CI&version=1&glossary=1&highlight=on Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
famartin Posted March 6, 2013 Share Posted March 6, 2013 Yeah, I know that the precip map algorithms of the GGEM are always very inaccurate. Other than that I'm not sure. For some odd reason the Ukie also went very far north as well bringing 25 mm into the city. Huh? I don't even see half that on the UKMET, from what I'm looking at. Where r you looking? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ag3 Posted March 6, 2013 Share Posted March 6, 2013 Huh? I don't even see half that on the UKMET, from what I'm looking at. Where r you looking? Not quite 25mm, but definitely north of all it's previous runs: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cast4 Posted March 6, 2013 Share Posted March 6, 2013 Huh? I don't even see half that on the UKMET, from what I'm looking at. Where r you looking? http://www.americanwx.com/bb/index.php/topic/39603-significant-ocean-storm-march-6-8-2013-discussion-part-iii/?p=2191001 Don"t know if i'm just tired and reading it wrong or it's inaccurate. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
famartin Posted March 6, 2013 Share Posted March 6, 2013 You realize that those UKMET images include the Thursday night wave too... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ag3 Posted March 6, 2013 Share Posted March 6, 2013 You realize that those UKMET images include the Thursday night wave too... Total precip to hour 36: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Absolute Humidity Posted March 6, 2013 Share Posted March 6, 2013 From ag3 NYC Euro totals: NYC: .70". (.36" from coastal) LGA: .74" (.38" from coastal) ISP: 1.02" (.56" from coastal) BDR: .87" (.36" from coastal) PHL: .82" (.66" from coastal) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
famartin Posted March 6, 2013 Share Posted March 6, 2013 Worth noting that the highest 6-hour total is 0.18" at PHL... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Absolute Humidity Posted March 6, 2013 Share Posted March 6, 2013 Worth noting that the highest 6-hour total is 0.18" at PHL... I think that's where the slushy inch comes from. Would at least bump them over 3" for the season. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mookiemike Posted March 6, 2013 Share Posted March 6, 2013 Looks like a lot of qpf wasted on a cold rain and some sleet. Thermal profile has boundary level issues until some unknown point late afternoon Wednesday to as late as evening in Metro Philly, where I am. Any accumulating snow seems relegated to this time period, and the wave on Thursday evening which looks to affect the northern area of our coverage area. Gale force NE winds, but it is March when the elements come together. Well, it makes it one step better than 2011, so enjoy whatever comes our way. I'm waiting till new guidance comes out early morning, as this is going to be a combination of now casting and mesoscale forecasting, but I'm prepared for a slushy 1-2". Just keeping it real. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
famartin Posted March 6, 2013 Share Posted March 6, 2013 I'll admit right now, I'm nervous about the coating-2 inches I put out. If the heavier CCB precip gets just far enough north... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wolfie09 Posted March 6, 2013 Share Posted March 6, 2013 Nam not gonna back down.. I will say the nam took the euro to the wood shed last even for upstate..(the 28th).. And it also had the uk/ggem and ens on its side.. Can the nam with 2 in a row? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
phlwx Posted March 6, 2013 Share Posted March 6, 2013 -- (this plays up a ton of backlash on Thursday night & Friday) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wolfie09 Posted March 6, 2013 Share Posted March 6, 2013 Nam being disregarded as u would expect.. Mount holly FTER DAYS OF ANTICIPATION, THE STORM THAT HAS BEEN WELL DISCUSSED,BUT NOT NECESSARILY WELL MODELED IS BEGINNING TO IMPACT THE AREA.LATEST RADAR IMAGERY SHOWED PRECIP, MAINLY IN THE FORM OF RAINAFFECTING TH MD ERN SHORE AND SRN AND CNTRL DE ATTM. IT WASBEGINNING TO MOVE INTO EXTREME SRN NJ AS WELL. TEMPS HAVE ACTUALLYRISEN A BIT ACRS THE ERN SHORE OF MD AND IN DE ERLY THIS MRNG. ITAPPEARS AS THAT THE AREAS WHERE PRECIP IS FALLING HEAVIER, IT ISLIQUID AND WHERE IT IS LIGHTER (AKA TO THE W CURRENTLY), IT IS SNOW.NORMALLY, AS WE GET CLOSER TO THE EVENT, CONFIDENCE INCREASES.HOWEVER, THIS IS ONE OF THOSE ANOMALOUS EVENTS, WHERE THAT IS NOTNECESSARILY THE CASE. WHILE OVERALL, THE MDLS HAVE A DECENT HANDLEON THE TRACK OF THE LOW, THERE ARE ENOUGH DIFFERENCES IN THEINDIVIDUAL DETAILS TO CONTRIBUTE TO INCREASED UNCERTAINTY. THE NAMCONTINUES TO BE ABNORMALLY WET AND COLD AND IS BEING DISREGARDED. ITALSO TENDS TO STALL THE LOW OVER THE WATER FOR AN EXTENDED PD OFTIME.THE CMC AND GFS ARE IN DECENT AGREEMENT AND HAVE A BIT MORE NLY SOLNTHAN THE UKMET AND ECMWF WHICH ARE A BIT FURTHER S. THE MORE SRNSOLNS WOULD MEAN LESS QPF, BUT A BIT COLDER SOLNS. WHEN THE 06/00ZECMWF CAME IN, IT HAD LESS QPF THEN THE 06/00Z GFS SOLN WHICHSUPPORTS THIS HYPOTHESIS. FOR NOW WILL LEAN TWD A MORE SRN TRACK.THE GENL FCST RATIONALE REMAINS THE SAME. PRECIP WILL BE MAINLYRAIN S OF I-95 TODAY AND GENLY SNOW N OF THERE. ITS MARCH, AND WITHTHE HIGHER SUN ANGLE, IT WILL BE TOUGH FOR IT TO ACCUMULATE MUCHDURG THE DAY ON TREATED SURFACES UNLESS IT COMES DOWN HEAVY. ONE OFTHE KEY QUESTIONS REMAINS WHERE THE PRECIP CUT OFF WILL BE. IF THEMORE SRN TRACK OF THE ECMWF/UKMET IS MORE CORRECT, THEN THE NRNPORTIONS OF THE REGION MAY NOT SEE MUCH AT ALL.&&.SHORT TERM /6 PM THIS EVENING THROUGH 6 AM THURSDAY/...THE FCST BECOMES MORE PROBLEMATIC THIS EVENING. THE PRECIP SHUDTRANSITION TO SNOW AND THEN ITS JUST A QUESTION OF HOW MUCH QPF ISLEFT. BOTH THE EC AND GFS HAVE SOME QPF BETWEEN 07/00Z AND 07/06ZAND MUCH LESS BETWEEN 07/06Z AND 07/12Z. SO IT REMAINS TO BE SEENHOW MUCH QPF IS LEFT AND OF COURSE, WHAT THE TEMPS ARE.SO, FOR NOW, WILL CONVERT THE WINTER STORM WATCH TO A WINTER WEATHERADVISORY FOR ALL COUNTIES WHERE IT WAS IN EFFECT AND ADD MERCER,MONMOUTH, OCEAN, SOMERSET AND HUNTED IN NJ. DEPENDING ON WHAT LATERGUIDANCE DOES, IT THE ADVY CUD BE UPGRADED TO A WARNING FOR PORTIONSOF THE AREA. http://forecast.weather.gov/product.php?site=NWS&issuedby=PHI&product=AFD&format=CI&version=1&glossary=1&highlight=off Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.