Geos Posted March 2, 2013 Share Posted March 2, 2013 About 10" and counting for DLL at 66hr. ...12-14" by 72 hours. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
michsnowfreak Posted March 2, 2013 Share Posted March 2, 2013 Proper measuring is checking (and clearing) the board at 7 AM, 1 PM, 7 PM, and 1 AM. That's the probable reason for the 4" Midway snowfall. However, anything that falls and melts in between is not counted. Most people check as soon as the snow lets up and reports it, thus higher amounts than the 'official' measurement. That really makes ORD/Harwood Heights measurements seem strange. A snowfall like the last one is quite rare, so it made the measuring quite tricky. That is definitely true about the measuring times. However...say you cleared the board at 1pm, and then 3 more hours of snow dropped 1.5" when the snow let up at 4pm but if you waited til 7pm (after 3 hours of no snow) and the snow had settled to 1.3". You would not have to wait til 7pm, if you are sure the snow is done at 4pm you could report then. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MidwestChaser Posted March 2, 2013 Share Posted March 2, 2013 18z NAM LOL Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ILSNOW Posted March 2, 2013 Share Posted March 2, 2013 18z NAM LOL baes off the 18z Nam should rename this the ALEK storm (12-14 for him) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MidwestChaser Posted March 2, 2013 Share Posted March 2, 2013 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
michsnowfreak Posted March 2, 2013 Share Posted March 2, 2013 Nice to see a slow north trend continue on the nam..keep coming north Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hoosier Posted March 2, 2013 Share Posted March 2, 2013 High LAF crew meltdown potential if the 18z NAM is on the right track. Warm air is probably my biggest concern at this point. Nonetheless, locally speaking it's one of the better potentials to get within 3 days this winter (that's not saying much). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Geos Posted March 2, 2013 Share Posted March 2, 2013 If something like this verifies, I might have to start putting snow in the backyard. Don't have much more room out front within 12 feet of the driveway! lol Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BeastFromTheEast Posted March 2, 2013 Share Posted March 2, 2013 Gotta love the fracking nam, farther north, weaker than the globals lol. lolwut? Nam is going bonkers with the QPF compared to other models.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BeastFromTheEast Posted March 2, 2013 Share Posted March 2, 2013 Going to be an incredible razor thin cutoff up North here.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brewers Posted March 2, 2013 Share Posted March 2, 2013 Going to be an incredible razor thin cutoff up North here.. Yup we're living on the edge Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Geos Posted March 2, 2013 Share Posted March 2, 2013 18z NAM vs. 12z GFS. Both models have 12"+ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gosaints Posted March 2, 2013 Share Posted March 2, 2013 Saints- Looks like we are shoveling...spring cancel Yes this is the type of storm that could really produce la crosse going watches west of the river Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thundersnow12 Posted March 2, 2013 Share Posted March 2, 2013 What a run. Wonder if the NAM would handle the banding better. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Indystorm Posted March 2, 2013 Share Posted March 2, 2013 Even if we halve NAM precip this would certainly still be the best storm of the season here in Michiana. LAF may have to worry about mixing or ice given prior analog mentioned earlier. Tracks can still change, however. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
A-L-E-K Posted March 2, 2013 Share Posted March 2, 2013 lol Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MidwestChaser Posted March 2, 2013 Share Posted March 2, 2013 Even if we halve NAM precip this would certainly still be the best storm of the season here in Michiana. LAF may have to worry about mixing or ice given prior analog mentioned earlier. Tracks can still change, however. Poor LAF. Nothing works out for those guys. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brewers Posted March 2, 2013 Share Posted March 2, 2013 MKE SREF plume Mean - 4.17 16.78 11.73 9.88 8.56 7.38 7.19 5.16 4.41 4.27 2.45 2.32 1.78 1.14 1.03 0.88 0.82 0.50 0.41 0.36 0.31 0.24 0.00 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ajdos Posted March 2, 2013 Share Posted March 2, 2013 Nice to see a slow north trend continue on the nam..keep coming north +10... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ILSNOW Posted March 2, 2013 Share Posted March 2, 2013 The ALEK storm Dvn update INITIALLY THERE WILL BE A WARM ADVECTION WING OF MODERATE TOPOTENTIALLY HEAVY SNOW DEVELOPING BY EARLY MONDAY WHICH WILL THENPIVOT NORTHWARD AND SET UP SHOP OVER OUR NORTHERN CWA DURING THEDAY. IN MARCH YOU HAVE TO START GETTING CONCERNED WITH THUNDERSNOWSIF THE ADVECTION IS INTENSE ENOUGH. THIS WILL BE SOMETHING TOMONITOR. THEN THE MAIN DYNAMICS WITH STRONG LARGE SCALE FORCING ANDDECENT MOISTURE ARRIVE MONDAY NIGHT WITH THE DEFORMATION ZONE THENFORMING OVER MOST OF THE CWA ON TUESDAY LASTING INTO TUESDAY NIGHT.SNOWFALL AMOUNTS OF AT LEAST 4 TO 10 INCHES SEEM LIKELY WITH THEHIGHEST AMOUNTS ACROSS OUR NORTH HALF. HOWEVER...THIS IS A COMPLEXSYSTEM AND DETERMINING THE EXACT LOCATION OF THE HEAVIER SNOW BANDSIS RATHER DIFFICULT AT THIS POINT. ALSO THE TRACK OF THE SYSTEM ISNOT ETCHED IN STONE YET. THERE MAY ALSO BE EMBEDDED THUNDER MONDAYNIGHT WITH THE STRONG DYNAMICS WHICH MAY ENHANCE SNOWFALL TOTALSEVEN MORE. THE GRADIENT TIGHTENS TUESDAY EVENING AS THE SURFACE LOWPUSHES OFF TO OUR EAST. WIND GUSTS SHOULD INCREASE TO AT LEAST 30MPH WHICH MAY PRODUCE SOME BLOWING AND DRIFTING. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Geos Posted March 2, 2013 Share Posted March 2, 2013 LSE and DMX just hoisted watches. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brewers Posted March 2, 2013 Share Posted March 2, 2013 LSE and DMX just hoisted watches. You can add DVN as well. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MidwestChaser Posted March 2, 2013 Share Posted March 2, 2013 http://www.meteor.iastate.edu/~ckarsten/cobb/cobb.php?model=namm&site=kdpa Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BeastFromTheEast Posted March 2, 2013 Share Posted March 2, 2013 Mad-Town probably will be 60"+ after this storm.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TugHillMatt Posted March 2, 2013 Share Posted March 2, 2013 Nice to see a slow north trend continue on the nam..keep coming north I agree. But then Indiana has been denied alot this year. My area also has a one foot deep glacier that is giving the early March sunshine quite the fight. Not melting much at all.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Geos Posted March 2, 2013 Share Posted March 2, 2013 15z SREF plume is averaging 14" for DBQ. About 10-14" for DLL and go saints. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Natester Posted March 2, 2013 Share Posted March 2, 2013 Well it can be save to say that piles of snow will linger well into April after this storm. There are still piles of snow left from the December 19-20, 2012 blizzard. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TugHillMatt Posted March 2, 2013 Share Posted March 2, 2013 Going to be an incredible razor thin cutoff up North here.. What else is new??? Doesn't the NAM always do that? Plus, razor sharp cutoffs seem to be the "new normal". Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hoosier Posted March 2, 2013 Share Posted March 2, 2013 18z NAM text output for LAF...lol. 03/05 06Z 32 31 94 14 0.07 0.00 541 550 1.9 -21.0 1011 100 -RA 010OVC227 0.0 6.2 03/05 09Z 32 31 91 13 0.09 0.00 542 549 2.8 -21.4 1008 100 -RA 011OVC238 0.0 6.8 03/05 12Z 32 31 95 11 0.10 0.00 541 547 1.9 -22.2 1007 100 -RA 008OVC192 0.0 4.5 03/05 15Z 33 32 101 5 0.13 0.00 539 545 -1.6 -22.9 1007 100 SN 007OVC233 1.4 0.8 03/05 18Z 33 32 8 4 0.21 0.00 535 540 -4.4 -24.1 1006 100 -SN 007OVC239 2.1 2.7 03/05 21Z 33 30 347 9 0.03 0.00 531 537 -7.2 -26.0 1007 100 -SN 008OVC193 0.3 4.8 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RCNYILWX Posted March 2, 2013 Share Posted March 2, 2013 Proper measuring is checking (and clearing) the board at 7 AM, 1 PM, 7 PM, and 1 AM. That's the probable reason for the 4" Midway snowfall. However, anything that falls and melts in between is not counted. Most people check as soon as the snow lets up and reports it, thus higher amounts than the 'official' measurement. That really makes ORD/Harwood Heights measurements seem strange. It's all tied to GMT synoptic hours (12z, 18z, 00z, 06z), so in CST, you measure at 6am, 12pm, 6pm, and 12am, but you're right about EST. On the second point, you're actually supposed to measure when the snow stops and not wait until the synoptic hour. You're only supposed to wait until the synoptic hour while it's still snowing, to account for compaction. Let's say it quickly snowed 1" in a very marginal temp situation after 18z and then it stopped. If you wait until 00z and the snow melted by then, it would be like the snow never fell, which is obviously incorrect.The ORD measurement was decent for the last event, best we could tell. It was lower by a bit over an inch than CoCoRaHS reports close by in Elk Grove Village. Harwood Heights was probably wrong: IL-CK-196 : HARWOOD HEIGHTS 1.9 NNE * : 0.93 / 3.4 / MM / MM- ratios were low but not 3:1. It's a double-edged sword with snowfall measurements for the WFO's because obviously there's a right way to do measurements, but if everyone did it that way, we wouldn't know how much snow was falling real time for purposes of verifying warnings or needing to upgrade advisories to warnings. Another point is that the measurements that are done more frequently than synoptic hours are probably a bit inflated, but on the other hand, the other measurements we rely on, from COOPs and some CoCoRaHS, are not any better, and likely underdone because other than the Midway 3SW COOP, they're only measuring and clearing the board every 24 hours (which may have been the case with Harwood Heights). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.