Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,910
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    Gilkian8980
    Newest Member
    Gilkian8980
    Joined

March Med/Long Range Disco


WinterWxLuvr

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 2.2k
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  On 3/2/2013 at 5:54 PM, Ian said:

there are waaaaaay more people who talk about the models these days than even 2 or 3 years ago. most don't really understand the bias aspect and how to use them all together from what i've gathered. there has been a proliferation of "only use the euro" of late.. from mets.. which imo is bizarre.

Yeah.  I have to wonder if these "mets" were asleep during synoptic and modeling/forecasting class ...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 3/2/2013 at 5:52 PM, tdmorrow said:

It makes sense because the 0z and 12z runs are the runs with the new data.

 

That's not true. DTK has stated till he's blue in the face that the 6 & 18z have the most up to date ships, surface, and plane obs @ init. Those runs should never be thrown out but the 0-12z given the most weight. There has been many times that the 6 & 18z sniffed a shift first and the main runs followed suit. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 3/2/2013 at 5:44 PM, thunderman said:

Not sure I agree with this.  Most of the general public doesn't even know what a snowfall "gradient" is.  The will see one model that has snow and that's all they will see.  It would be counterproductive IMO.

 

 

Yeah, people hear what they want and remember as such. I'm sure someone will remember last nights ECMWF as a local mets forecast. Always happens. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 3/2/2013 at 5:56 PM, Bob Chill said:

That's not true. DTK has stated till he's blue in the face that the 6 & 18z have the most up to date ships, surface, and plane obs @ init. Those runs should never be thrown out but the 0-12z given the most weight. There has been many times that the 6 & 18z sniffed a shift first and the main runs followed suit. 

That is probably true but I don't think those change the models as much as the new upper air data does and that only comes out every 00z and 12z. I have seen many changes in the 6z and 18z runs, but I was telling him that is probably why he thinks he sees more noticeable changes on the 00z and 12z runs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 3/2/2013 at 5:57 PM, yoda said:

What MIGHT be skewing the GEFS QPF mean is at 108, 6 of the ensembles show an area of 1" QPF over top of us or very close to us

But there also are no complete whiffs anymore and there are quite a few like the ones you mention that hammer us. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 3/2/2013 at 6:22 PM, NE Balti Zen said:

Ian, how much dropoff in qpf as you head north from DCA? Still decent qpf up toward Phineas and psu or is that where the cutoff is?

.5"+ gets pretty much everyone except extreme NE MD which is a little less.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...