Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,609
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    NH8550
    Newest Member
    NH8550
    Joined

February 25-27 Winter Storm Part 4


wisconsinwx

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 362
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Heck, I could probably make a snow hotel about now!

 

Snowing at a good clip now. Snow trying to stick to the pavement a little. Definitely sticking where the shade would be this time of day.

 

Haha^, I guess not everybody likes snow in Milwaukee!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

One interesting (and ANNOYING) thing about this storm is it is very apparent those of use who live by the water were screwed the most (see lakeshore in Chicago, lakeshore in Toronto, and downriver Detroit). The iceburg snowbanks didnt budge, but several areas of the grass completely sucked up the snow today (other areas still had 2" left, so id say avg depth is 1") while areas just to my west still had SOLID (albeit slushy and mangy) cover. And now big charlie brown flakes have resumed less than an hour ago with immediate sticking to grass/old snow. With a cold extended forecast (if you believe the CFS, cold straight through March) and a glacier snowpack it would have been one of the rare chances to have a full snowcover through much of March. Now to see what this band of snow can do, hrrr has it hanging around for hours.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Last I heard from OB he had 7". 10 miles made or broke this storm.

You havent increased your 3" though?

 

My "storm total" will exceed 3" here, but its basically 2.2" that left depth ranging from 2-3" (where there was old snow), then melting leading to depth T-2", now moderate snow redeveloping.

 

Its a combination of many snowfalls, but its actually unique how big the snowbanks are in parking lots considering there is such low depth on the actual ground.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

One interesting (and ANNOYING) thing about this storm is it is very apparent those of use who live by the water were screwed the most (see lakeshore in Chicago, lakeshore in Toronto, and downriver Detroit). The iceburg snowbanks didnt budge, but several areas of the grass completely sucked up the snow today (other areas still had 2" left, so id say avg depth is 1") while areas just to my west still had SOLID (albeit slushy and mangy) cover. And now big charlie brown flakes have resumed less than an hour ago with immediate sticking to grass/old snow. With a cold extended forecast (if you believe the CFS, cold straight through March) and a glacier snowpack it would have been one of the rare chances to have a full snowcover through much of March. Now to see what this band of snow can do, hrrr has it hanging around for hours.

 

One nice thing about the lake to the east here in Toronto, and in Chicago, is that it can occasionally give back. One week it's a moderating influence, the next you're sitting under a streamer dropping 1-2"/hr rates. In your case, it seems Lk Erie/Detroit River/Lk St. Clair hurt but never help. Curious...have you ever experienced LES from Lk Erie?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

One interesting (and ANNOYING) thing about this storm is it is very apparent those of use who live by the water were screwed the most (see lakeshore in Chicago, lakeshore in Toronto, and downriver Detroit). The iceburg snowbanks didnt budge, but several areas of the grass completely sucked up the snow today (other areas still had 2" left, so id say avg depth is 1") while areas just to my west still had SOLID (albeit slushy and mangy) cover. And now big charlie brown flakes have resumed less than an hour ago with immediate sticking to grass/old snow. With a cold extended forecast (if you believe the CFS, cold straight through March) and a glacier snowpack it would have been one of the rare chances to have a full snowcover through much of March. Now to see what this band of snow can do, hrrr has it hanging around for hours.

wrong lakeshore se Wisconsin did great

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You havent increased your 3" though?

 

3.1" this morning. There was a coating of slush on my board when I got home around noon that I measured 0.1" with so 3.2". Since then it's been raining although we just switched back to snow in the last 30 minutes. A couple of inches of backwash tonight would held lessen the sting a bit.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3.1" this morning. There was a coating of slush on my board when I got home around noon that I measured 0.1" with so 3.2". Since then it's been raining although we just switched back to snow in the last 30 minutes. A couple of inches of backwash tonight would held lessen the sting a bit.

 

Hopefully YBY can get to 40" for the season after tonight.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

One nice thing about the lake to the east here in Toronto, and in Chicago, is that it can occasionally give back. One week it's a moderating influence, the next you're sitting under a streamer dropping 1-2"/hr rates. In your case, it seems Lk Erie/Detroit River/Lk St. Clair hurt but never help. Curious...have you ever experience LES from Lk Erie?

90% of our LES comes from Lk MI and 10% from Lk Huron. I do not ever recall seeing LES from Lk Erie. HOWEVER...radar right now is actually a decent indication, if everything falls into place right, then Lake Erie can seem to enhance synoptics if the precip is rotating E-W rather than the usual W-E.

 

I was down by the River last night (about 0.25 mile from mby) and there was less snow (Id guess more like 1-1.5" to my 2" at the time). Also, out by the airport (7 miles west) there was definitely more snow, not quite but close to an inch more. One of those rare instances where its so thread the needle the water hurts (doesnt happen as often here as downtown Chicago..I can recall maybe 3 instances, including today, since Jan 1, 2008 where the water led to such marked differences).

Link to comment
Share on other sites


000

NWUS53 KMKX 272003

LSRMKX

PRELIMINARY LOCAL STORM REPORT

NATIONAL WEATHER SERVICE MILWAUKEE/SULLIVAN WI

202 PM CST WED FEB 27 2013

..TIME... ...EVENT... ...CITY LOCATION... ...LAT.LON...

..DATE... ....MAG.... ..COUNTY LOCATION..ST.. ...SOURCE....

..REMARKS..

1130 AM HEAVY SNOW 6 NW KENOSHA 42.64N 87.90W

02/27/2013 M13.2 INCH KENOSHA WI TRAINED SPOTTER

STORM TOTAL SO FAR.

&&

$$

DDV


000

NWUS53 KMKX 272001

LSRMKX

PRELIMINARY LOCAL STORM REPORT...CORRECTED

NATIONAL WEATHER SERVICE MILWAUKEE/SULLIVAN WI

201 PM CST WED FEB 27 2013

..TIME... ...EVENT... ...CITY LOCATION... ...LAT.LON...

..DATE... ....MAG.... ..COUNTY LOCATION..ST.. ...SOURCE....

..REMARKS..

0905 AM HEAVY SNOW HINGHAM 43.64N 87.91W

02/27/2013 M16.9 INCH SHEBOYGAN WI CO-OP OBSERVER

STORM TOTAL SO FAR. SNOW DEPTH OF 24 INCHES.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So these massive amounts were isolated to Mt. Geos/Racine? ORD/MKE relatively screwed? Did the swath of heavy accums extend inland or were they localized to the lakeshore?

 

Sheboygan which is north of MKE got destroyed , almost 17" with 5 foot drifts. The lake shore counties did very well, seems like 10+" is very common around the area but tapers off further inland you go.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...