gosaints Posted February 25, 2013 Share Posted February 25, 2013 Lol at the Nam being the Nam. 6+ in la crosse Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Natester Posted February 25, 2013 Share Posted February 25, 2013 Lol at the Nam being the Nam. 6+ in la crosse I kind of doubt La Crosse will see any snow from this. Maybe a few flurries though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Harry Posted February 25, 2013 Share Posted February 25, 2013 Lol at the Nam being the Nam. 6+ in la crosse I'll have to ban myself if this system finds a way to track like that. lol Thankfully yeah it is the NAM. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Geos Posted February 25, 2013 Share Posted February 25, 2013 watch MKE going with a watch and based off this run of the Nam KLOT shouldnt. Haha, that would look odd. Not sure what's going on there with those 3 sub 6" sections extending out from Yorkville about. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TugHillMatt Posted February 25, 2013 Share Posted February 25, 2013 Why is the NAM such a mess with bubbles of Max snowfall and low snowfall all over the place? Is it because temps are so close to freezing? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chicago WX Posted February 25, 2013 Share Posted February 25, 2013 This is good stuff here from OK: http://www.americanwx.com/bb/index.php/topic/39477-february-25th-26th-potential-blizzard/?p=2152922'>http://www.americanwx.com/bb/index.php/topic/39477-february-25th-26th-potential-blizzard/?p=2152922 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gosaints Posted February 25, 2013 Share Posted February 25, 2013 I kind of doubt La Crosse will see any snow from this. Maybe a few flurries though. Lol I dont know if I would go that far both the Nam and ggfs are hinting at some backside crap Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chicago WX Posted February 25, 2013 Share Posted February 25, 2013 0.57" for LSE on the NAM. Looking good for DDL. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Harry Perry Posted February 25, 2013 Share Posted February 25, 2013 http://forums.accuweather.com/index.php?showtopic=30611&view=findpost&p=1709554'>This? Yeah that's it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chicago WX Posted February 25, 2013 Share Posted February 25, 2013 0z 4km NAM 60 hour total snowfall: http://www.meteo.psu.edu/~fxg1/NAMSFC4US_0z/snow60.gif Super duper weenie totals in the Plains. Closer to home, Chicago and Milwaukee do very well...as do other parts of IA, IL, MI, ON, and WI. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chitown Storm Posted February 25, 2013 Share Posted February 25, 2013 SWS pulled for LOT. Changes coming? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stormtrackertf Posted February 25, 2013 Share Posted February 25, 2013 0z 4km NAM 60 hour total snowfall: http://www.meteo.psu.edu/~fxg1/NAMSFC4US_0z/snow60.gif Super duper weenie totals in the Plains. Closer to home, Chicago and Milwaukee do very well...as do other parts of IA, IL, MI, ON, and WI. Haha, the 30-40"+ in the TX Panhandle. They're going to get a massive walloping there though, just not that otherworldly. I feel like here in Detroit, we could just as easily get 3" as we could 10". So many variables coming into play. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gilbertfly Posted February 25, 2013 Share Posted February 25, 2013 MKX goes WSW for portions of their area Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chitown Storm Posted February 25, 2013 Share Posted February 25, 2013 SE Wisconsin makes the WSW list.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Harry Perry Posted February 25, 2013 Share Posted February 25, 2013 SWS pulled for LOT. Changes coming? Hmm... Possibilities possibilities. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wisconsinwx Posted February 25, 2013 Share Posted February 25, 2013 SE Wisconsin makes the WSW list.... Nooooo! I'm kidding, I guess I'll take it, just hope they don't go warning eventually and bust. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thundersnow12 Posted February 25, 2013 Share Posted February 25, 2013 Almost forcing LOT's hand lol 5-9" amounts for the MKE watch text. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brewers Posted February 25, 2013 Share Posted February 25, 2013 URGENT - WINTER WEATHER MESSAGE NATIONAL WEATHER SERVICE MILWAUKEE/SULLIVAN WI 932 PM CST SUN FEB 24 2013 ...SNOW EXPECTED TUESDAY AFTERNOON INTO WEDNESDAY MORNING... .LOW PRESSURE MOVING ACROSS TEXAS TONIGHT...WILL GATHER STRENGTH AS IT MOVES OVER ARKANSAS INTO SOUTHERN MISSOURI MONDAY NIGHT. THE LOW WILL THEN HEAD TOWARD NORTHERN INDIANA AND ON INTO SOUTHERN LOWER MICHIGAN WEDNESDAY MORNING. THE LOW WILL THEN STALL OVER LOWER MICHIGAN THROUGH WEDNESDAY BEFORE DRIFTING OFF TO THE EAST ON THURSDAY. WIZ052-059-060-064>066-069>072-251145- /O.NEW.KMKX.WS.A.0004.130226T1800Z-130227T1200Z/ SHEBOYGAN-WASHINGTON-OZAUKEE-JEFFERSON-WAUKESHA-MILWAUKEE-ROCK- WALWORTH-RACINE-KENOSHA- INCLUDING THE CITIES OF...SHEBOYGAN...WEST BEND... PORT WASHINGTON...JEFFERSON...LAKE MILLS...WAUKESHA... BROOKFIELD...MILWAUKEE...JANESVILLE...BELOIT...ELKHORN... LAKE GENEVA...RACINE...KENOSHA 932 PM CST SUN FEB 24 2013 ...WINTER STORM WATCH IN EFFECT FROM TUESDAY AFTERNOON THROUGH LATE TUESDAY NIGHT... THE NATIONAL WEATHER SERVICE IN MILWAUKEE/SULLIVAN HAS ISSUED A WINTER STORM WATCH...WHICH IS IN EFFECT FROM TUESDAY AFTERNOON THROUGH LATE TUESDAY NIGHT. * TIMING...SNOW IS EXPECTED TO START TUESDAY AFTERNOON AND CONTINUE THROUGH WEDNESDAY MORNING. * SNOW ACCUMULATIONS...5 TO 9 INCHES. * WINDS...NORTHEAST WINDS UP TO 35 MPH. * IMPACTS...SNOW MAY BECOME HEAVY DURING THE EVENING RUSH OUR TUESDAY. PRECAUTIONARY/PREPAREDNESS ACTIONS... A WINTER STORM WATCH MEANS THERE IS A POTENTIAL FOR SIGNIFICANT SNOW...SLEET...OR ICE ACCUMULATIONS THAT MAY IMPACT TRAVEL. CONTINUE TO MONITOR THE LATEST FORECASTS. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SchaumburgStormer Posted February 25, 2013 Share Posted February 25, 2013 Almost forcing LOT's hand lol 5-9" amounts for the MKE watch text. I feel like NW area of LOT cwa is about a much of a lock for a watch as can be. Lasalle to Joliet SE is prolly a bit hairy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chicago Storm Posted February 25, 2013 Author Share Posted February 25, 2013 I still wouldn't go WSW if I were LOT. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Toronto4 Posted February 25, 2013 Share Posted February 25, 2013 00z RGEM further south than the 00z NAM: http://collaboration.cmc.ec.gc.ca/cmc/cmdn/pcpn_type/pcpn_type_gem_reg.html Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thundersnow12 Posted February 25, 2013 Share Posted February 25, 2013 Lol GFS just laughed big time at the MKE office. Not getting 5" up there this run. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ILSNOW Posted February 25, 2013 Share Posted February 25, 2013 I still wouldn't go WSW if I were LOT. you are right but do they have a choice now?? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BowMeHunter Posted February 25, 2013 Share Posted February 25, 2013 gfs is tossed off the horse. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gilbertfly Posted February 25, 2013 Share Posted February 25, 2013 I still wouldn't go WSW if I were LOT. only reason i would are because of forecast winds in addition to any winter precip...otherwise ^^^ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thundersnow12 Posted February 25, 2013 Share Posted February 25, 2013 I wonder what offices are favoring the Euro, has been most consistent amounts wise. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MidwestChaser Posted February 25, 2013 Share Posted February 25, 2013 I still wouldn't go WSW if I were LOT. Just went with one. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thunder Road Posted February 25, 2013 Share Posted February 25, 2013 The 0z RGEM is way south. Good sign for the GGEM potentially. Total snow accum just through 0z Wed (and still snowing at this point): Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thundersnow12 Posted February 25, 2013 Share Posted February 25, 2013 gfs is tossed off the horse. 1-3" in southern WI lol Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ajdos Posted February 25, 2013 Share Posted February 25, 2013 00z RGEM further south than the 00z NAM: http://collaboration.cmc.ec.gc.ca/cmc/cmdn/pcpn_type/pcpn_type_gem_reg.html Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.