CoastalWx Posted February 28, 2013 Share Posted February 28, 2013 The fat lady can hum all she wants, but I don't see any signs of warm weather. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HoarfrostHubb Posted February 28, 2013 Share Posted February 28, 2013 Just one more warning event that verifies is all I ask... ..oh, who the hell am I kidding. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SlantStickers Anonymous Posted February 28, 2013 Share Posted February 28, 2013 The pattern giving legitimate hope for snowstorms into march instead of calling for a blowtorch is encouraging enough for now, and I don't think any of us would mind a KU to end the season either. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Damage In Tolland Posted February 28, 2013 Share Posted February 28, 2013 No 50's all Morch? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ORH_wxman Posted February 28, 2013 Share Posted February 28, 2013 There is no sign of a warmup later in the month either...at least not yet. The weeklies were pretty cold. CFS weeklies show a relaxation after Mar 20th but not a blowtorch. Analogs suggest we keep the blocking aorund at least until near the equinox...but possibly later than that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ORH_wxman Posted February 28, 2013 Share Posted February 28, 2013 No 50's all Morch? Almost impossible to pull that off, but ORH did in March 2001 with a max temp of 49F. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Damage In Tolland Posted February 28, 2013 Share Posted February 28, 2013 Almost impossible to pull that off, but ORH did in March 2001 with a max temp of 49F. I figured Snowman 21 would pull some stat out saying it's never happened Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ORH_wxman Posted February 28, 2013 Share Posted February 28, 2013 I figured Snowman 21 would pull some stat out saying it's never happened ITs reall yhard since avg highs by the end of the month even at ORH are in the 47-48F range. Even March 1960 couldn't pull it off with 4 highs of 52F, 5F, 52F, and 54F to close the month from Mar 28-31...andthat was one ofthe coldest Marches on record. But as said before, 2001 did manage to pull it off....1960 was sick in that we didnt get a high of 40F until March 18th and didnt break freezing until March 12th. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ginx snewx Posted February 28, 2013 Share Posted February 28, 2013 Meh Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ORH_wxman Posted February 28, 2013 Share Posted February 28, 2013 Meh Guess you canceled your Moon Storm. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ginx snewx Posted February 28, 2013 Share Posted February 28, 2013 Guess you canceled your Moon Storm.Lol no just playing Scooter like he did before the blizzard, he Mehed me two times in the week before it. Pattern looks good, let's do this and lol at those analogs, but that frigging 2010! keeps popping up along side 93,60 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ORH_wxman Posted February 28, 2013 Share Posted February 28, 2013 Lol no just playing Scooter like he did before the blizzard, he Mehed me two times in the week before it. Pattern looks good, let's do this and lol at those analogs, but that frigging 2010! keeps popping up along side 93,60 The blocking is similar to 2010 but the airmass is a lot better...so don't read too much into the 2010 analog....we have much better cross polar flow into the US than that year. The airmasses will inherently be marginal often in March, but 2010 was beyond stale even for March. It was a great pattern though sans airmass....remember your Sultan Storm mid-month barely missed being a monster snow bomb for the interior...try that setup again this year and see if we get rain out of it at 1000 feet....fat chance Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ginx snewx Posted February 28, 2013 Share Posted February 28, 2013 The blocking is similar to 2010 but the airmass is a lot better...so don't read too much into the 2010 analog....we have much better cross polar flow into the US than that year. The airmasses will inherently be marginal often in March, but 2010 was beyond stale even for March. It was a great pattern though sans airmass....remember your Sultan Storm mid-month barely missed being a monster snow bomb for the interior...try that setup again this year and see if we get rain out of it at 1000 feet....fat chanceDid you see the world record -93 set in Siberia? cross polar and a 2010 block looks sweet, let's spray some refreshener to get rid of Jerry Elephant farts, it reeks. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ginx snewx Posted February 28, 2013 Share Posted February 28, 2013 Well one similarlity to 2010 rivers are already high from snowmelt, precip this month over 5 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ORH_wxman Posted February 28, 2013 Share Posted February 28, 2013 Did you see the world record -93 set in Siberia? cross polar and a 2010 block looks sweet, let's spray some refreshener to get rid of Jerry Elephant farts, it reeks. No, link? And yes, the elephant will be flushed out over the next few days. Not to be confused with 40F highs in early March sun, but just aloft it will be pretty cold unlike 2010. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Allsnow Posted February 28, 2013 Share Posted February 28, 2013 I figured Snowman 21 would pull some stat out saying it's never happened Lmao Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
donsutherland1 Posted February 28, 2013 Share Posted February 28, 2013 Did you see the world record -93 set in Siberia? cross polar and a 2010 block looks sweet, let's spray some refreshener to get rid of Jerry Elephant farts, it reeks. Has the WMO verified the possible Northern Hemisphere record? I didn't see or hear of any press releases, but the site leaves much to be desired. When it comes to concrete data, the WMO is really quite opaque. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ORH_wxman Posted February 28, 2013 Share Posted February 28, 2013 Has the WMO verified the possible Northern Hemisphere record? I didn't see or hear of any press releases, but the site leaves much to be desired. When it comes to concrete data, the WMO is really quite opaque. Apparently the record was -96F set on Feb 19th but it hasn't been confirmed by WMO that I can find http://www.examiner.com/article/new-record-low-temperature-for-northern-hemisphere-set-russia-s-siberia Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ginx snewx Posted February 28, 2013 Share Posted February 28, 2013 Apparently the record was -96F set on Feb 19th but it hasn't been confirmed by WMO that I can find http://www.examiner.com/article/new-record-low-temperature-for-northern-hemisphere-set-russia-s-siberia'>http://www.examiner.com/article/new-record-low-temperature-for-northern-hemisphere-set-russia-s-siberia not for nothing, ever think why there was not more press on this....hmmmmm Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
USCAPEWEATHERAF Posted February 28, 2013 Share Posted February 28, 2013 March 1-3rd event looks like its out to sea right now, could come further northward, but models currently have it out to sea as trough digs into the central GOM and then heads ENEward out to sea as confluence sets up northeast of the disturbance in question. This looks like a no brainer, although i will continue to monitor latest model updates. The second storm is for the March 6-8th period which looks like a coastal bomb, but is a mid Atlantic special currently but trends could bring this threat further to the northeast with time. The supposed blocking pattern shifts eastward on models and thats why we have two storms back to back out to sea currently. TIme for a lot to change, and I'm sure it will. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
weathafella Posted February 28, 2013 Share Posted February 28, 2013 March 1-3rd event looks like its out to sea right now, could come further northward, but models currently have it out to sea as trough digs into the central GOM and then heads ENEward out to sea as confluence sets up northeast of the disturbance in question. This looks like a no brainer, although i will continue to monitor latest model updates. The second storm is for the March 6-8th period which looks like a coastal bomb, but is a mid Atlantic special currently but trends could bring this threat further to the northeast with time. The supposed blocking pattern shifts eastward on models and thats why we have two storms back to back out to sea currently. TIme for a lot to change, and I'm sure it will. I think Cape Cod, MA is in the bullseye. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KartAnimal29 Posted February 28, 2013 Share Posted February 28, 2013 not for nothing, ever think why there was not more press on this....hmmmmm Because a Mini Ice Age is coming, or at least a major cool down. I've been looking into this for a few months now. There is some very interesting stuff some people are putting out there about it. Seen some talk about a soon as this year we start to see a cool down all the way to 2015 that it starts. The main guy that I was following pulled all of his videos on this along with the pole shift videos that he's been reporting on , which is going on right now. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CoastalWx Posted February 28, 2013 Share Posted February 28, 2013 Because a Mini Ice Age is coming, or at least a major cool down. I've been looking into this for a few months now. There is some very interesting stuff some people are putting out there about it. Seen some talk about a soon as this year we start to see a cool down all the way to 2015 that it starts. The main guy that I was following pulled all of his videos on this along with the pole shift videos that he's been reporting on , which is going on right now. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr Torchey Posted February 28, 2013 Share Posted February 28, 2013 What in gods name is going on around here? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ginx snewx Posted February 28, 2013 Share Posted February 28, 2013 wow, pole shift? Geez Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SouthCoastMA Posted February 28, 2013 Share Posted February 28, 2013 What in gods name is going on around here? Dennis Quaids fears are becoming a reality. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CoastalWx Posted February 28, 2013 Share Posted February 28, 2013 wow, pole shift? Geez Magnetic north? That is shifting. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KartAnimal29 Posted February 28, 2013 Share Posted February 28, 2013 Magnetic north? That is shifting. Sorry I should have said Magnetic North not Pole Shift. Just look at all the Airports that had to change the numbers on the runways this past year. There is only one reason why they would do that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
weathafella Posted February 28, 2013 Share Posted February 28, 2013 Sorry I should have said Magnetic North not Pole Shift. Just look at all the Airports that had to change the numbers on the runways this past year. There is only one reason why they would do that. The kids in Bristol are sharp as a pistol when they do the Bristol Stomp. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ginx snewx Posted February 28, 2013 Share Posted February 28, 2013 My pole shifted, unfortunately. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.