Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,616
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    Vesuvius
    Newest Member
    Vesuvius
    Joined

February 25-26 Winter Storm


wisconsinwx

Recommended Posts

diagnostics....

MODEL DIAGNOSTIC DISCUSSION
NWS HYDROMETEOROLOGICAL PREDICTION CENTER COLLEGE PARK MD
1127 AM EST SUN FEB 24 2013

VALID FEB 24/1200 UTC THRU FEB 28/0000 UTC

...SEE NOUS42 KWNO (ADMNFD) FOR THE STATUS OF THE UPPER AIR
INGEST...

12Z NAM/GFS EVALUATION AND PRELIMINARY MODEL PREFERENCES

MODEL INITIALIZATION ERRORS ARE DESCRIBED UNDER THE RELEVANT
SYSTEM HEADING.


...DEVELOPING LOW PRESSURE SYSTEM ACROSS THE SOUTHERN PLAINS
TODAY...
...CLOSED UPPER-LEVEL LOW MOVING FROM THE SOUTHERN PLAINS INTO THE
OHIO RIVER VALLEY...

PRELIMINARY PREFERENCE: 00Z ECMWF/00Z UKMET BLEND
CONFIDENCE: AVERAGE

THE NAM INITIALIZED SEA-LEVEL PRESSURE FIELD IN THE VICINITY OF
THIS DEVELOPING LOW PRESSURE SYSTEM IS TOO HIGH BY 4 TO 8
HPA...INDICATING POOR INITIALIZATION OF THIS SURFACE LOW PRESSURE
SYSTEM BY THE NAM. THE NAM FORECAST TRACK FOR THE SURFACE LOW DOES
NOT DIFFER SUBSTANTIALLY FROM CONSENSUS...HOWEVER THE NAM SEEMS TO
CONTINUE TO BE TOO WEAK WITH THE LOW THROUGH TUESDAY. THE NAM ALSO
APPEARS TO BE SLOWER WITH THE PROGRESSION OF THE COLD FRONT ACROSS
THE SRN PLAINS/LOWER MS RIVER VALLEY RELATIVE TO CONSENSUS. THE
GFS APPEARS TO HAVE INITIALIZED THE LOW PRESSURE SYSTEM REASONABLY
WELL AND THE GFS SOLUTION CLUSTERS CLOSELY WITH THE 00Z
ECMWF/UKMET. THE GFS APPEARS TO LAG A BIT BEHIND THE MODEL
CONSENSUS WITH THE SURFACE LOW FROM 12Z TO 18Z TUESDAY. SPREAD
INCREASES SOMEWHAT WITH THE UPPER-LEVEL LOW AS IT MOVES INTO THE
OHIO RIVER VALLEY ON TUESDAY. THE NAM SHOWS THE UPPER-LEVEL LOW
FARTHER NORTH BY WEDNESDAY MORNING RELATIVE TO CONSENSUS. BY
WEDNESDAY THE GFS SOLUTION DIFFERS FROM WHAT WAS SHOWN IN THE 00Z
ECMWF ENSEMBLE MEAN AND 06Z GEFS MEAN...WITH THE GFS SHOWING AN
UPPER-LEVEL LOW THAT AMPLIFIES MORE RELATIVE TO NON-NCEP GUIDANCE
AND REMAINS FARTHER WEST. GIVEN THE SHIFT OF THE GFS AWAY FROM ITS
OWN PREVIOUS MEAN...WILL RECOMMEND THE 00Z ECMWF/00Z UKMET AT THIS
TIME.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 1k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

12z GGEM way north. Takes the low to the middle of the southern end of the Lake. And then sits and spins, until the secondary tries to takes over...but has issues doing so. 

 

Chicago stays frozen though.

 

Really though, it's a pretty crappy model.

 

EDIT: it's actually colder, a bit further south than its 0z run.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12z GGEM way north. Takes the low to the middle of the southern end of the Lake. And then sits and spins, until the secondary tries to takes over...but has issues doing so. 

 

Chicago stays frozen though.

 

Really though, it's a pretty crappy model.

 

EDIT: it's actually colder, a bit further south than its 0z run.

I really hoped that it would get better after its upgrade but other than reducing the bombs in the mid-long range I haven't been impressed. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm pretty sure it was Feb 6/08 but it could be my mind playing tricks. I didn't remember Jan 26-27/04

 

Feb 6, 2008 had about 5" by morning imby with the PART A wave, although I remember there was the special weather statement issued by EC stating that a swath of near 8" fell from Milton to Mississauga. Then there was a 6 hour break, and then PART B arrived by mid afternoon with about 8" additional. 20" seems like a stretch but in Mississauga on the morning of the 7th, 16 or 17" of snow may have fallen in total. 

 

Jan 26-27, 2004 was the big lake enhanced storm. You may have been too young to remember it but south Etobicoke and east Mississauga got hit very hard. Almost 2 feet.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Feb 6, 2008 had about 5" by morning imby with the PART A wave, although I remember there was the special weather statement issued by EC stating that a swath of near 8" fell from Milton to Mississauga. Then there was a 6 hour break, and then PART B arrived by mid afternoon with about 8" additional. 20" seems like a stretch but in Mississauga on the morning of the 7th, 16 or 17" of snow may have fallen in total. 

I remember watching BT that morning saying that there was about that much snow that fallen. Seems like we were under a defo band.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...