Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,606
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    ArlyDude
    Newest Member
    ArlyDude
    Joined

February 21st - 23rd Winter Storm Part 2


Powerball

Recommended Posts

CNN is trolling

"North of where the biggest snow will fall, Chicago could receive what would be its largest single snowfall of the year -- 4 inches, Miller said. The city usually gets up to 4 feet of snow a year. So far this year, only about a foot has fallen, he said."

Inflation.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 840
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Live tower cam video from KSN in Wichita: http://www.ksn.com/content/weather/liveradar.aspx

 

When I saw .35" liquid equiv. had fallen on Wichita by noon I was thinking this could really add up fast and maybe if they get a good hit tonight would break the all-time snowstorm record of 15".  But then I saw the official noon report is 3".  Kind of low ratios for 25 degrees....maybe some measurement error with the liquid equivalent.  Snow's still going strong there now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Euro still advertising 100-300 J/kg of CAPE  for an extended period for the STL area tomorrow. A lot of QPF showing up on the maps from the convective parameterization scheme. Looks like a rocking good time. I still really expect rapid p-type changes on the fly. Might be a sweet spot to the NW of the metro that gets in on the convection but stays cold enough for all snow and ends up jackpotting a 8+" total.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

CNN is trolling

 

"North of where the biggest snow will fall, Chicago could receive what would be its largest single snowfall of the year -- 4 inches, Miller said. The city usually gets up to 4 feet of snow a year. So far this year, only about a foot has fallen, he said."

 

Lol. 

Dramatic effect indeed!

 

RPM in line with the NAM.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

NWS is the best in the biz, no doubt about it. But sometimes the warning/advisory layouts look a little strange. Of course this storm is a huge PITA to forecast I'm sure. I guess the criteria may be different down there, from LSX to PAH...but it just looks, funny (northern part of image).

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

NWS is the best in the biz, no doubt about it. But sometimes the warning/advisory layouts look a little strange. Of course this storm is a huge PITA to forecast I'm sure. I guess the criteria may be different down there, from LSX to PAH...but it just looks, funny (northern part of image).

 

attachicon.gifScreen Shot 2013-02-20 at 1.49.37 PM.

 

TSA's page looks funny too.

 

http://www.srh.noaa.gov/tsa/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

TSA did that on purpose, according to their discussion.  They expect higher snow amounts in a small band south of lower amounts.  

I see their thinking but it does look a bit odd on the map, more like if there was a topographic feature there or something, not flat Oklahoma plains lol.

 

Yeah should have thought of the Ouachita Mountains!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Pardon my ignoance, but can someone please explain to me why this storm occludes and weakens so fast. I remember the GHD storm occluded and weakened kind of like this storm but those located on the eastern portion of this forum were still able to get 8-12. With this storm we'll be lucky to get an inch.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A full blown weenie must've wrote that; perhaps down by Dodgeville or Platteville, which may even be out of the CWA, but beyond that, the 3-5" range for Madison looks ok, but not 3-5" then 1-2" additional.

Yup I agree, they really shouldn't include the whole CWA in one SWS since there's a decent snow gradient.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

it's like a 2" CWA spread, relax

I thought they were actually using the 12z GFS which shows way less snow in Madison, and then assumed they must be referring to the areas way to the southwest that are projected to get the amounts the SWS talks about. Looks like they're just sticking with the higher precip runs from last night though, which show alot of the region getting larger amounts.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

killer dry wedge

Yeah, this is one of those where you look out your window and nothing is going on, then 10 minutes later it might be coming down good.

Thinking we could see a short period of decent rates here tomorrow night (maybe .5-1" per hour?). Normally don't like going with halves but since it's a small event, I'm liking the 1.5-2.5" range for LAF. Might be able to bump to 2-3" later on if confidence grows in a good front end thump. :weenie:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah, this is one of those where you look out your window and nothing is going on, then 10 minutes later it might be coming down good.

Thinking we could see a short period of decent rates here tomorrow night (maybe .5-1" per hour?). Normally don't like going with halves but since it's a small event, I'm liking the 1.5-2.5" range for LAF. Might be able to bump to 2-3" later on if confidence grows in a good front end thump. :weenie:

 

Chuck them :weenie: :weenie: :weenie: deep.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...