Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,608
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    NH8550
    Newest Member
    NH8550
    Joined

February 21st - 23rd Winter Storm Part 2


Powerball

Recommended Posts

Tough call for your area. One important plus is you guys look to get much more precip overall compared to the very dry runs that were seen a few days ago. Looks like you guys may battle some pingers at times, but being that close to the mix line could yield you some very heavy bursts of snow. No matter how much you guys end up with it should be very entertaining in the least. :thumbsup:

Warm layer here is barely above 0C (really just fractions of a degree) and like 200-500 feet thick when most of the precip falls on the 00z GFS/NAM. I think we'd get by with minimal pingers if that verifies exactly. It sorta feels like a toned down version of 12/15/07...quick round of pingers, Tim cancels/goes to bed and misses the good rates and we end up with a nice storm. Just kidding Tim.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 840
  • Created
  • Last Reply

What kind of ratios are you thinking for this?  I was guessing around 13-15:1 with the main burst at least.  Figure there's gonna be some great dendrites with that.  Following that though I'm guessing more of a 10:1 with much smaller small flakes as the pseudo dry slot moves overhead. 

 

Yeah I think they'll fluctuate depending on banding etc. Should be highest early on and slowly go down.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awesomeness happening in the plains right now as the upper low crawls east bringing with it strong lift coupled with moisture advection aided by the backed LLJ of 50kts into the TX PH, combination of that and you get a radar exploding with convection in eastern NM and the southern TX PH.

 

attachicon.gif12.png

Agree...good stuff.

 

In the C/W forum, baro suggested there could be some 20-25" jackpot amounts in KS as all of this comes together.  Interesting storm for sure.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Spring planting conditions looking up for KS and southern NE.

Good for the utility companies too, we were suppose to lay fiber down there this week in the areas that already have 6-9 inches. I don't think we will be starting that project anytime soon. More time for ice fishing, so this storm is a win for me! :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

In my mind I've been poo-pooing the storm all week, assuming that mid-level dryness would crumble the band just as it enters Chicagoland, but I don't know, the models see something impressive this last cycle.  Other mets have mentioned elevated instability down around STL will probably make for some decently intense precipitation rates on the leading edge, and it seems that if we transport that northeast (and if we now think that that will overcome whatever negative factor the drying ends up being) that this could end up being an overperformer all the way to Lansing or so.

 

Would be awesome to see our biggest snowfall of the season tomorrow night (i.e. anything > 3.5")

Link to comment
Share on other sites

High?

 

All the model trends tonight have been positive..

IMO you're going to bust low..

 

 

Now I think you'll do quite well, and it's pretty much in consensus with what most mets in the region think.

 

We will see, although I think we see most if not all of our accumulation with the WAA band of snow. The mid levels look to dry pretty quickly Friday with limited moisture in the dgz so light snow or drizzle looks likely. Its all going to depend on how strong the initial band of snow is.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Chad tosses the 00z NAM...says it's too "pro snow" because of the initial dry air and later the mid level dryslot. Also still very concerned about sleet.

I think that is a solid, conservative, realistic forecast. Will have to see how the upper low forms after ejection, but both concerns are highly valid. 3-5 hr burst of mod snow with relatively low ratios is not conducive to 7"+ like some are forecasting for Chicago. Weirder things have certainly happened, though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Gem, ukmet, GGEM, and Euro are all far colder than the NAM. Now the 00z NAM for my area has gone a bit colder but is still a sleet storm.

 

But locally the dismissal of the Euro, Gem, ukmet, a bunch of hi-res models is confusing to me.  Hopefully they look at other models, even their own WRF besides the GFS. 

 

I am sure they will change things a bit from this graph, but it seems and understandably so that this set up is almost unimaginable for us to get snow from.  While I do not expect all snow and think we may get some sleet after the first 2-3 hours of enhanced precip passes.  this graph South East of the 5" line is under done.

 

My cal for the City of STL attm is 4-6" with sleet contamination, no freezing rain, maybe freezing drizzle at the end.

 

 

.UPDATE... ISSUED AT 936 PM CST WED FEB 20 2013 NO MAJOR CHANGES TO GOING FORECAST...STILL HAVE LOW CHANCE POPS FOR CENTRAL AND SOUTHERN PORTIONS OF FORECAST AREA AFTER 09Z...WITH THINGS RAMPING UP AFTER 12Z. UPPER LOW CURRENTLY OVER SOUTHERN AZ AND CONTINUES TO SLIDE TO THE EAST THIS EVENING...THEN BEGIN TO LIFT OUT TOWARDS FORECAST AREA BY 12Z. ALSO SEEING DECENT LOW LEVEL MOISTURE ADVECTING NORTH FROM WESTERN GULF AS LOW LEVEL JET IS RAMPING UP...HAVE 50 KTS AT KFWD AND 40KTS AT KSHV...WITH 00Z SOUNDINGS. 00Z NAM INDICATING MORE SNOW POSSIBLE FOR AREAS ALONG I-70...BUT WAITING TIL REST OF 00Z MODELS COME IN...BEFORE MAKING ANY ADJUSTMENTS.

 

StormTotalSnowFcst_zps07e97c91.png

 




			
		
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

 

1 1912 March 22-24 24.2 Inches 20.5 Inches (23rd)

2 1894 Feb 11-12 15.8 Inches 8.7 Inches (12th)

3 1958 January 20-21 14.6 Inches 10.5 Inches (21st)

4 1962 January 18-19 14.0 Inches 11.8 Inches (18th)

5 1960 March 14-15 13.8 Inches 8.0 Inches (15th)

6 1930 January 8-9 13.7 Inches 12.8 Inches (8th)

7 1900 February 27-28 13.0 Inches 11.8 Inches (27th)

8 1926 March 29.31 12.3 Inches 7.5 Inches (30th)

9 1918 December 23-24 12.2 Inches 9.5 Inches (24th)

10 1915 March 3-5 11.9 Inches 10.4 Inches (4th)

 

Kansas City has a shot...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...