Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,609
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    NH8550
    Newest Member
    NH8550
    Joined

Late February/Early March Medium and Long Range Discussion Thread


Dsnowx53

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 922
  • Created
  • Last Reply

That mar 2001 map is eerie to look at. Funny how far south and east it was modeled on the GFS 3-4 days out. Even though it was mostly a miss for us I'd gladly take a gamble with a similar set up to that, with the hope of an earlier phase

 

That was so close to being really big here, but everything was just a little too far east for us to cash in.

The Euro has the closed low signal in the long range, we just need it positioned far enough west.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's far more likely to be further east than west with the strong block in place, but at 200+ hrs, it's still a fantasy forecast at this point. 

I'm very curious to see what the Euro does coming up shortly as it usually has a bias of holding back energy and being less progressive than the GFS.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We know the GFS is going to be too far east in this set up, but we need the Euro and ensembles

to get far enough west for us to be competitive here. The GFS always had the March 2001

threat too far offshore like during the past blizzard. That was the last snowy analog date that

matches up with early March forecast. 

 

attachicon.gif20010301f132.gif

 

 

We know the GFS is going to be too far east in this set up, but we need the Euro and ensembles

to get far enough west for us to be competitive here. The GFS always had the March 2001

threat too far offshore like during the past blizzard. That was the last snowy analog date that

matches up with early March forecast. 

 

attachicon.gif20010301f132.gif

oooh man - those maps bring back some memories! havent seen those in at least decade.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Go on ewall and look at the reanalysis maps so fascinating to watch how it unfolded and what potential was truly available

ACCUWEATHER in NYC was calling for 30" in a 60 hour period.    I only remember one burst of snow, probably on Sunday evening with  maybe 5.5" accumulating.    Most of this 60 hour period was just cloudy and foggy with on and off cold drizzle and a nasty feel to it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Go on ewall and look at the reanalysis maps so fascinating to watch how it unfolded and what potential was truly available

 

 

Go on ewall and look at the reanalysis maps so fascinating to watch how it unfolded and what potential was truly available

i was talking about the actual maps, not the storm. But yes, that storm was a heart breaker. I remember Kocin on TWC saying 2-3 feet of snow for PHL-BOS...disaster

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Things get going too far east for us on this run which we have seen quite a bit this year so far.

 

The GEFS have backed off on the blocking signal already since the 00z run, and the mean trough in the Northeast underneath the block sets up pretty far east similar to the one we saw earlier this year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...