NEG NAO Posted February 28, 2013 Share Posted February 28, 2013 Sorry folks, the GGEM transfers the low over NYC, not New England http://meteocentre.com/models/explorateur.php?lang=en&map=na&run=12&mod=gemglb&stn=PNM&comp=1&run2=12&mod2=gemglb&stn2=PNM&hh2=168&fixhh=1&hh=156 the 0Z ensembles were far southeast of the OP - where are they this run ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wxoutlooksblog Posted February 28, 2013 Share Posted February 28, 2013 12z GGEM I think at this point, this storm is unlikely to be a significant snowmaker for the NYC Metro Region. There is really no model suggesting it would be. The idea cannot be completely ruled out, but it is becoming more unlikely and the trends are not good for snowlovers right now. WX/PT Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Allsnow Posted February 28, 2013 Share Posted February 28, 2013 The NAVGEM is closer to the Euro than the GFS through 120. nvg10.500.120.namer.gif Major snowstorm for NYC this run. Destroys us! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bluewave Posted February 28, 2013 Share Posted February 28, 2013 The NAVGEM came north. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
earthlight Posted February 28, 2013 Share Posted February 28, 2013 I think at this point, this storm is unlikely to be a significant snowmaker for the NYC Metro Region. There is really no model suggesting it would be. The idea cannot be completely ruled out, but it is becoming more unlikely and the trends are not good for snowlovers right now. WX/PT I can't think of a setup 174 hours out that should be deemed "likely" to produce a significant snowstorm for our area. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kaner587 Posted February 28, 2013 Share Posted February 28, 2013 I can't think of a setup 174 hours out that should be deemed "likely" to produce a significant snowstorm for our area. And honestly the trends are in every which direction right now so who the heck knows. What's clear is there is no clear camp with this storm in the modeling thus far. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
earthlight Posted February 28, 2013 Share Posted February 28, 2013 Through 84 hours, the Euro is now dragging a significant piece of the ULL very far south over the Ohio Valley and then through the Mid Atlantic. Was not doing this on earlier runs..this falls more in line with the GFS' handling of that feature. This feature being so far south and east means there will be less northern stream split over the Great Lakes and South-Central Canada to phase in with the vort coming out of the Pac. So if I was a betting man...I'd say this run trends towards the GFS idea. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Edge Weather Posted February 28, 2013 Share Posted February 28, 2013 I think at this point, this storm is unlikely to be a significant snowmaker for the NYC Metro Region. There is really no model suggesting it would be. The idea cannot be completely ruled out, but it is becoming more unlikely and the trends are not good for snowlovers right now. WX/PT The Euro nor any other model picked up on the recent blizzard until 138 hrs out. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
earthlight Posted February 28, 2013 Share Posted February 28, 2013 The northern stream vort now becomes a cutoff low of its own instead of just a shortwave/vortmax. So this run will probably be wildly different from what we've been seeing on the long range Euro. But there is now a big ULL spinning over/just East of New England. Which, in case you haven't been paying attention, is not good. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
earthlight Posted February 28, 2013 Share Posted February 28, 2013 The Euro still has this massive block building down from Eastern Canada through 114... so I can't say for sure where it's headed this run. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Weathergun Posted February 28, 2013 Share Posted February 28, 2013 A little piece the ULL still split over the Great Lakes. It may try to still phase. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
earthlight Posted February 28, 2013 Share Posted February 28, 2013 Pretty bizarre setup at 132. Strong vort just north of the Great Lakes is stationary, big block to the north of it. Upper level low is now northeast of New England, and the Pac shortwave is swinging through the Central US trying to turn the corner and amplify. Not phasing yet. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
earthlight Posted February 28, 2013 Share Posted February 28, 2013 Phasing now at 150 hours. The Pac vort, which ran ahead, is digging all the way to the Gulf Coast. Surface low is very far south as a result...1008mb off the SC coas.t Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dsnowx53 Posted February 28, 2013 Author Share Posted February 28, 2013 The northern stream vort definitely made a nice jump to the SE towards our storm from 144 to 150. So, the phase is definitely beginning to take shape, and the confluence is trying to move out of the way. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
earthlight Posted February 28, 2013 Share Posted February 28, 2013 1004mb surface low off the NC coast at 156 hours as the phase occurs...but very little room for this to come north and affect our area. The combination of the blocking and the upper level low means the entire pattern is pressing down pretty hard on this system. If the Euro is correct this is a prime pattern for a Southeast US cutoff low. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Weathergun Posted February 28, 2013 Share Posted February 28, 2013 It's hard to see how this going to get far north. The block has already linked up the Midwest ridge at 156hrs. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
earthlight Posted February 28, 2013 Share Posted February 28, 2013 Rapidly deepening now at 162 as the phase occurs. Looks like 992-996mb sitting on OBX ..with the CCB hammering Easterm NC and the coastline (too warm for snow just glancing at 2m temps). Again..way too far south for our area due to the blocking and the upper level low being farther south initially. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dsnowx53 Posted February 28, 2013 Author Share Posted February 28, 2013 Yeah, the block was too strong and too west based, leaving too much confluence and resistance along the east coast. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
earthlight Posted February 28, 2013 Share Posted February 28, 2013 The Euro essentially looks similar to this..with a more broad CCB/precipitation shield. http://www.meteo.psu.edu/~fxg1/DGEXEAST_6z/f162.gif Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dsnowx53 Posted February 28, 2013 Author Share Posted February 28, 2013 The blocking orientation bothers me. I don't like seeing it oriented so far to the west. That will leave way too much confluence downstream of it, which is right off our coastline. That really needs to change. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Weathergun Posted February 28, 2013 Share Posted February 28, 2013 The blocking orientation bothers me. I don't like seeing it oriented so far to the west. That will leave way too much confluence downstream of it, which is right off our coastline. That really needs to change. I don't like it either. The 12z GEFS had the same thing: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IntenseBlizzard2014 Posted February 28, 2013 Share Posted February 28, 2013 I don't like it either. The 12z GEFS had the same thing: 12zGEFS.gif I highly doubt that this will be the end result. Shorter Wavelengths+Dying Greenland Block=Further N&W track. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ace0927 Posted February 28, 2013 Share Posted February 28, 2013 those who bet the under on March snowfall in the NYC area are looking real solid right about now. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MJO812 Posted February 28, 2013 Share Posted February 28, 2013 those who bet the under on March snowfall in the NYC area are looking real solid right about now. Nothing is set in stone just yet. Still have a couple of days to iron this out. We need to see changes though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ace0927 Posted February 28, 2013 Share Posted February 28, 2013 Nothing is set in stone just yet. Still have a couple of days to iron this out. We need to see changes though. Nothing is set in stone just yet. Still have a couple of days to iron this out. We need to see changes though. we should probably ignore the fact that there isnt any real cold air around (for like the 10th time this winter season) also... and for the 17th time this winter season the big -NAO advertised by the Euro in the 7-10 day frame won't and hasn't materialized... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bmc10 Posted February 28, 2013 Share Posted February 28, 2013 we should probably ignore the fact that there isnt any real cold air around (for like the 10th time this winter season) also... and for the 17th time this winter season the big -NAO advertised by the Euro in the 7-10 day frame won't and hasn't materialized... Are you paying any attention? It is the shear strength, size and position of the ubber neg nao and west based block that is preventing the northward progression of this system along with the ULL supressing hgts along the ec. The block is and will come to fruition. The airmass in advance of the system does not have to be "cold" (relative term) to produce snow. In this setup the phase would allow the cold to drain down from the northern stream, there is enough cold to be tapped. Factor in the explosive nature, cutoff, and dynamics and you can get snow. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ace0927 Posted February 28, 2013 Share Posted February 28, 2013 Are you paying any attention? It is the shear strength, size and position of the ubber neg nao and west based block that is preventing the northward progression of this system along with the ULL supressing hgts along the ec. The block is and will come to fruition. The airmass in advance of the system does not have to be "cold" (relative term) to produce snow. In this setup the phase would allow the cold to drain down from the northern stream, there is enough cold to be tapped. Factor in the explosive nature, cutoff, and dynamics and you can get snow. Are you paying any attention? It is the shear strength, size and position of the ubber neg nao and west based block that is preventing the northward progression of this system along with the ULL supressing hgts along the ec. The block is and will come to fruition. The airmass in advance of the system does not have to be "cold" (relative term) to produce snow. In this setup the phase would allow the cold to drain down from the northern stream, there is enough cold to be tapped. Factor in the explosive nature, cutoff, and dynamics and you can get snow. "I had a dream".... This is not a block, If you think this is a snow storm h5 map you dont pay attention: now here is the euro from 3.5 days ago...this is what I was talking about: This WILL NOT come too fruition: notice the real dual blocking justs south of Greenland and just north of alaska. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PB GFI Posted February 28, 2013 Share Posted February 28, 2013 Since this SW is still 1000 miles south of the Aleutians and 6 days out , I will refrain from throwing the threat away,until theres at least 1 West coast sampling and we are inside 96 hours .Hard to expect a goldilocks scenario 150 plus hours out . Maybe it is an Atlanta to Roanoke special , but do you really wana go all in on that this far out ? I said 2 days ago I thought a 3 to 4 SD below normal in the NAO may not be to our benefit , but will wait until Monday to see if anything in the modeling takes on a different look . Remember at 6 days out , if theres the smallest variable missed in any of the models initialization , it gets magnified downstream . The GFS may be right in the end but at 150 - 170 hrs away it really is outside its effective range , so I just cant look at it until we are inside 96 hours . The Euro has really backed off , as has its control and the overnite ensembles . It`s an uglier solution and that I will not deny .I will wait a few days until its on the grid to close the window otherwise , at 150 hrs the spray stil gives you a shot . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MJO812 Posted February 28, 2013 Share Posted February 28, 2013 Here is the 12z Euro ensemble mean Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bluewave Posted February 28, 2013 Share Posted February 28, 2013 The Euro ensembles are further north with the low this run than the OP. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.