Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,609
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    NH8550
    Newest Member
    NH8550
    Joined

Late February/Early March Medium and Long Range Discussion Thread


Dsnowx53

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 922
  • Created
  • Last Reply

But didnt we said this afternoon earlier phase was better?..now its too early?

 

 

There was more confluence on this run to the northeast as well, so the initial height rises out ahead of our shortwave were a bit reduced. I thought the phase was going to make up for that, but it didn't. For the most part, an earlier phase is better. But if the phase occurs before that confluence moves out of the way, the height rises will be minimal, meaning it won't gain much latitude before it gets cut off. And once it becomes cut off, it just stalls and does not gain latitude. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The difference this run is not so much that the phase is too early, it's that the blocking to the north is stronger because the block over SE Canada links up with ridging bulging north from the upper Midwest.

How much of a shift would it take to let this baby ride up the coast?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The orientation of the block changing yielded much more confluence near our area. The blocking ridge "points" towards the Upper Midwest instead of the Atlantic. Thus, downstream from our block, we have an area of confluence just offshore as opposed to well offshore.

 

Since that confluence was not able to move out of the way in time, the phase did not allow for a large initial gain in latitude. So, once the low DID become cut off, it was not at any higher of a latitude than it was when it initially phased.

 

That's what I meant by phasing too early. It phased when the confluence over the region was still strong. I guess I should have been more clear. But had the block's orientation changed and thus, the location of the confluence been more east, the earlier phase would have been greatly beneficial. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The NAO is rising. This should come more north.

 

http://www.cpc.ncep.noaa.gov/products/precip/CWlink/pna/nao.sprd2.gif

 

It may phase earlier, but Climo suggest that it'll move further north and a fast moving Jet will accompany this threat, if the phasing occurs earlier or later if the core of the blocking drifts SE or SW.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 . The european view of the NAO is much stronger , so this look is prob wrong , it's not neg enough.

2 . It rises after day 7 even according to this , it's still heading lower as the SW is at HSE

3. Like I said earlier It MAY NOT come north if the values are so NEG you can shunt the system

4. I just ignore the GFS

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...