Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,609
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    NH8550
    Newest Member
    NH8550
    Joined

Late February/Early March Medium and Long Range Discussion Thread


Dsnowx53

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 922
  • Created
  • Last Reply

UKMET 144 hrs: 10 mb deeper with the incoming low than the GFS at the same time 

GZ_D5_PN_144_0000.gif

where does the low go after 144 ? I think you have to also take into consideration climatology here - it doesn't favor such a suppressed GFS solution in March..............Euro today should be VERY telling as too what direction we are heading next week

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's pretty evident that the UKmet would drive a vigorous low further north than the Euro with a secondary around the Delmarva. As I have noted in other posts, everything is contingent on the strength of the confluence over the NE and whether the 50/50 low drifts east slowly/lags (GFS) or it moves out (Euro/UKmet). GFS has the SE bias and tends to also be too slow with lifting out upper level disturbances. However, given the blockiness of the pattern and the fact that it is almost March, GFS could be on to something. Signifcant height rises east of the SLP is also missing on the GFS...we get a system that never flexes its muscles and also stays positively tilted.

 

where does the low go after 144 ? I think you have to also take into consideration climatology here - it doesn't favor such a suppressed GFS solution in March..............Euro today should be VERY telling as too what direction we are heading next week

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's pretty evident that the UKmet would drive a vigorous low further north than the Euro with a secondary around the Delmarva. As I have noted in other posts, everything is contingent on the strength of the confluence over the NE and whether the 50/50 low drifts east slowly/lags (GFS) or it moves out (Euro/UKmet). GFS has the SE bias and tends to also be too slow with lifting out upper level disturbances. However, given the blockiness of the pattern and the fact that it is almost March, GFS could be on to something. Signifcant height rises east of the SLP is also missing on the GFS...we get a system that never flexes its muscles and also stays positively tilted.

so the ukmet is moving more towards a Euro solution ? GFS is on to something ?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Still has the same idea of dropping the ULL south and phasing at 168. This run will end up farther south and east, but it continues to look nothing like the GFS or other models with its setup and interactions aloft.

 

 

Still has the same idea of dropping the ULL south and phasing at 168. This run will end up farther south and east, but it continues to look nothing like the GFS or other models with its setup and interactions aloft.

is the issue the big upper low to our north and east? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Still has the same idea of dropping the ULL south and phasing at 168. This run will end up farther south and east, but it continues to look nothing like the GFS or other models with its setup and interactions aloft.

 

It looks like it could be hanging back some energy at 96 hrs off the West Coast which might mean a quicker phase.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

is the issue the big upper low to our north and east? 

 

Partially...and the Euro is just later with the phase in general. The vort that comes out of the Pac NW drops really far south this run...it goes off the Southeast Coast.

 

But its still gonna phase..and the block is forcing it do so near our area. So we will probably still see snow on this run but the big low will form out to sea.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...