Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,609
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    NH8550
    Newest Member
    NH8550
    Joined

February 21st - 23rd Winter Storm


Powerball

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 991
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Some interesting observations today with regards to the progged thermodynamic environment as well as precip and QPF amounts being spit out by the globals. This mainly pertains to folks west and south of a ORD-LAF line (and especially near and west of the MS River).

 

There has been great consistency in forecasting a strong LLJ with plenty of moisture transport over the cold dome. Of particular note is the strength of the elevated warm nose on model soundings/profiles. For some time now, the GFS and EC have been sporadically spitting out some precip from the convective parameterization scheme (this appears "splotchy" on QPF maps). This behavior really amplified today and caused a substantial increase in the precip of the forward flank of the storm. This is primarily due to an elevated conditionally unstable layer in the soundings. There's also a wide region of deep moist neutral profiles and theta-e folding on BUFKIT soundings, which suggest that there should be some fairly widespread convective enhancement. With the primary warm front so far south, this strong warm nose will be pretty far aloft for a good chunk of the event and may lead to rapid changes in p-type based on precip rates. This can also lead to significant QPF underestimates in favored banding areas or where convection is present.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Some interesting observations today with regards to the progged thermodynamic environment as well as precip and QPF amounts being spit out by the globals. This mainly pertains to folks west and south of a ORD-LAF line (and especially near and west of the MS River).

 

There has been great consistency in forecasting a strong LLJ with plenty of moisture transport over the cold dome. Of particular note is the strength of the elevated warm nose on model soundings/profiles. For some time now, the GFS and EC have been sporadically spitting out some precip from the convective parameterization scheme (this appears "splotchy" on QPF maps). This behavior really amplified today and caused a substantial increase in the precip of the forward flank of the storm. This is primarily due to an elevated conditionally unstable layer in the soundings. There's also a wide region of deep moist neutral profiles and theta-e folding on BUFKIT soundings, which suggest that there should be some fairly widespread convective enhancement. With the primary warm front so far south, this strong warm nose will be pretty far aloft for a good chunk of the event and may lead to rapid changes in p-type based on precip rates. This can also lead to significant QPF underestimates in favored banding areas or where convection is present.

 

You gotta post here more often man

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Some interesting observations today with regards to the progged thermodynamic environment as well as precip and QPF amounts being spit out by the globals. This mainly pertains to folks west and south of a ORD-LAF line (and especially near and west of the MS River).

 

There has been great consistency in forecasting a strong LLJ with plenty of moisture transport over the cold dome. Of particular note is the strength of the elevated warm nose on model soundings/profiles. For some time now, the GFS and EC have been sporadically spitting out some precip from the convective parameterization scheme (this appears "splotchy" on QPF maps). This behavior really amplified today and caused a substantial increase in the precip of the forward flank of the storm. This is primarily due to an elevated conditionally unstable layer in the soundings. There's also a wide region of deep moist neutral profiles and theta-e folding on BUFKIT soundings, which suggest that there should be some fairly widespread convective enhancement. With the primary warm front so far south, this strong warm nose will be pretty far aloft for a good chunk of the event and may lead to rapid changes in p-type based on precip rates. This can also lead to significant QPF underestimates in favored banding areas or where convection is present.

 

You gotta post here more often man

Agreed. I don't post much but I love the read. I remember getting a great schooling through Csnsvy on the Litchfield spring '11 trip and touchdown. Kudos to all here though!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As it has been for several runs, my primary concern is moisture. Precipitation type looks to be primarily snow, but a primarily virga storm would not be fun (though that's probably overstating the situation.

 

 

why are you worried about moisture. no this doesn't look to be the porn storm of earlier but the initial slug of moisture shouldn't be lacking for a nice 6 hr or so thump.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Isn't that a bit later than some of the other recent runs?  Probably still bad for those east of Lake Michigan's longitude, but as long as the trend is in favor of a slightly later occlusion, many of us still have hope of a decent storm.

 

Quicker actually. It's reduced QPF for places like MKE, ORD compared to its 12z run. LAF doesn't get to 0.25"...total. Faster occlusion, less precip. You don't want that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Quicker actually. It's reduced QPF for places like MKE, ORD compared to its 12z run. LAF doesn't get to 0.25"...total. Faster occlusion, less precip. You don't want that.

 

Clearly so, what I noticed is it slowed down in getting precip in here.  The actual timing of the occlusion was probably about the same, but given the slowing trend from the 12z that hardly mattered and the actual location of occlusion was further west.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Clearly so, what I noticed is it slowed down in getting precip in here.  The actual timing of the occlusion was probably about the same, but given the slowing trend from the 12z that hardly mattered and the actual location of occlusion was further west.

 

Gotcha. I misread your previous post.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Always interesting to watch the models at this range, considering the big changes that are possible.

 

0z GFS has the low just south of MSP at 18z Friday. The 12z run had it over ORD at the same time. Same strength though, so bonus points there.

 

Was gone most of the day, so I actually just noticed that difference. Lot of wobbling going on.

 

Would be great to see a 0z solution from last night.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I give up on this one in terms of significant snow here. Good luck to everyone in IA/WI/IL/IN/MO.

 

But I do like the look of that "bonus" shortwave from 156hr to 162hr. If this system can wrap back to the west just a little more, there would be room for that southern vort at 156hr to amplify for us in the Eastern Lakes/Ohio Valley.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I give up on this one in terms of significant snow here. Good luck to everyone in IA/WI/IL/IN/MO.

 

But I do like the look of that "bonus" shortwave from 156hr to 162hr. If this system can wrap back to the west just a little more, there would be room for that southern vort at 156hr to amplify for us in the Eastern Lakes/Ohio Valley.

Lol. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hopefully we can reverse trends and get the original idea of a slower evolving/bowling ball type event to dump on much of the region.  This quicker and quicker occluding crap trend needs to stop and reverse course now lol.  Still a long ways out in time so plenty of time for some big changes.  Hopefully they'll be good ones.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...