OHweather Posted February 16, 2013 Share Posted February 16, 2013 Wow...looks like the Euro really trended stronger with the energy as it moves out of the west. If it closes off at 500mb and occludes that far west it won't really matter what the 50/50 does. Yikes. Wonder if the recon out in the Pacific had anything to do with these 0z models coming in a lot stronger with the energy moving out of the west. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wisconsinwx Posted February 16, 2013 Share Posted February 16, 2013 keep that on accuweather. What, you don't appreciate posters with their input? No sarcasm or malice with this either. I just think they are likely onto something, a stronger, perhaps quicker occluding system. We will see, though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
csnavywx Posted February 16, 2013 Share Posted February 16, 2013 Hate to be the Debbie Downer, but all of these solutions are fully occluded well before the MS river (some before the MO river). That doesn't bode well for big totals east of about ORD's longitude as the best frontogenesis and deformation will have been eaten up by frontolytic processes and a filling upper low by then. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chargers09 Posted February 16, 2013 Share Posted February 16, 2013 So we go from the Euro being the furthest south to being the furthest north. Good ol run to run continuity. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BowMeHunter Posted February 16, 2013 Share Posted February 16, 2013 What, you don't appreciate posters with their input? No sarcasm or malice with this either. I just think they are likely onto something, a stronger, perhaps quicker occluding system. We will see, though. you think something different every run.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MidwestChaser Posted February 16, 2013 Share Posted February 16, 2013 What, you don't appreciate posters with their input? No sarcasm or malice with this either. I just think they are likely onto something, a stronger, perhaps quicker occluding system. We will see, though. Euro's been all over the place. Not much run to run consistency there. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BowMeHunter Posted February 16, 2013 Share Posted February 16, 2013 Hate to be the Debbie Downer, but all of these solutions are fully occluded well before the MS river (some before the MO river). That doesn't bode well for big totals east of about ORD's longitude as the best frontogenesis and deformation will have been eaten up by frontolytic processes and a filling upper low by then. think we've all accepted that by now. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wisconsinwx Posted February 16, 2013 Share Posted February 16, 2013 you think something different every run.. Yep, but even met's thoughts change. In fact, I would argue the worst are the stubborn ones unwilling to change their positions on what a storm is likely to do. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Geos Posted February 16, 2013 Share Posted February 16, 2013 Euro's been all over the place. Not much run to run consistency there. No argument there. GFS has been more consistent - less extreme. Cone of uncertainty for the EURO is now the Ohio River to MSP. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thunder Road Posted February 16, 2013 Share Posted February 16, 2013 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BowMeHunter Posted February 16, 2013 Share Posted February 16, 2013 Yep, but even met's thoughts change. In fact, I would argue the worst are the stubborn ones unwilling to change their positions on what a storm is likely to do. melting down Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MidwestChaser Posted February 16, 2013 Share Posted February 16, 2013 Yep, but even met's thoughts change. In fact, I would argue the worst are the stubborn ones unwilling to change their positions on what a storm is likely to do. You change run to run. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chargers09 Posted February 16, 2013 Share Posted February 16, 2013 I probably would wait for a few more days before 'locking in' anything. Especially when the model we're locking in just had this system in the OH valley last run. That's just me, though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MidwestChaser Posted February 16, 2013 Share Posted February 16, 2013 I probably would wait for a few more days before 'locking in' anything. Especially when the model we're locking in just had this system in the OH valley last run. That's just me, though. The rational ones here think that as well. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RCNYILWX Posted February 16, 2013 Share Posted February 16, 2013 http://www.crh.noaa.gov/news/display_cmsstory.php?wfo=lot&storyid=92589&source=0 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wisconsinwx Posted February 16, 2013 Share Posted February 16, 2013 Trust me, I don't believe for a second this will occlude up into Minnesota, and the "lock it in" was facetious since it is a catchphrase. They could be onto something is all I'm saying, even if it's not likely. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MidwestChaser Posted February 16, 2013 Share Posted February 16, 2013 Trust me, I don't believe for a second this will occlude up into Minnesota, and the "lock it in" was facetious since it is a catchphrase. They could be onto something is all I'm saying, even if it's not likely. Once again, the Euro's been all over the map. 12z might have something completely different, shooting down your idea. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OHweather Posted February 16, 2013 Share Posted February 16, 2013 I think LOT's write-up that RCNYILWX just linked sums things up pretty well. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BowMeHunter Posted February 16, 2013 Share Posted February 16, 2013 Trust me, I don't believe for a second this will occlude up into Minnesota, and the "lock it in" was facetious since it is a catchphrase. They could be onto something is all I'm saying, even if it's not likely. now in spin cycle Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MidwestChaser Posted February 16, 2013 Share Posted February 16, 2013 now in spin cycle Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
csnavywx Posted February 16, 2013 Share Posted February 16, 2013 http://www.crh.noaa.gov/news/display_cmsstory.php?wfo=lot&storyid=92589&source=0 This. Now leave out the (nearly worthless) DGEX and it's even better. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thundersnow12 Posted February 16, 2013 Share Posted February 16, 2013 I think the only feel good about this system place right now is probably Nebraska. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
csnavywx Posted February 16, 2013 Share Posted February 16, 2013 I think the only feel good about this system place right now is probably Nebraska. Which would be a good thing for everybody on the forum... if indirectly. They need a few 2 footers out there if we're going to help keep the death ridge outta here this summer. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stebo Posted February 16, 2013 Share Posted February 16, 2013 Yep, but even met's thoughts change. In fact, I would argue the worst are the stubborn ones unwilling to change their positions on what a storm is likely to do. Meteorologists don't change run to run, unless you are a bad one like DT. You have to watch for trends in the models, today's trend has been toward a stronger solution, however to what magnitude is yet to be decided. To latch onto the most extreme solution each time is probably not a good way to convey your points (note you were thinking this was going to be way South just 24 hours ago). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nwburbschaser Posted February 16, 2013 Share Posted February 16, 2013 I think the model shift tonight, especially the Euro just goes to show how far out we are and that uncertainty is going to prevail for a few more days. I see several strong solutions with plenty of time to adjust, and with 5-6 days of model schizophrenia to go, I wouldn't be too concerned about anything specific right now. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TugHillMatt Posted February 16, 2013 Share Posted February 16, 2013 No argument there. GFS has been more consistent - less extreme. Cone of uncertainty for the EURO is now the Ohio River to MSP. lol...that reminds of one of the meteorologists when I lived in PA who, no joke, had a forecast of a dusting to 1 foot for the next day. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thunder Road Posted February 16, 2013 Share Posted February 16, 2013 Ironic that the GFS has actually been the most consistent model so far. Relatively speaking anyway. But when we're talking 7-9 days out, that's really more of a curiosity than anything else. Let's see if it stays that way the next 2-3 days. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stebo Posted February 16, 2013 Share Posted February 16, 2013 Which would be a good thing for everybody on the forum... if indirectly. They need a few 2 footers out there if we're going to help keep the death ridge outta here this summer. Oh yeah, trust me when this storm started to materialize I was extremely pleased to see it. A huge snow pack out there does wonders for this region with respect to the death ridge and prospects of severe this spring. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nwburbschaser Posted February 16, 2013 Share Posted February 16, 2013 Oh yeah, trust me when this storm started to materialize I was extremely pleased to see it. A huge snow pack out there does wonders for this region with respect to the death ridge and prospects of severe this spring. To be honest, I would almost rather have this storm blow its load over Nebraska/N Kansas and put a dent in the drought. I wouldn't mind some snow here now, but I would rather see some benefits later this spring/summer if that's what the choices are. Obviously, the severe weather weenie in me trumps the winter storms. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
snowstormcanuck Posted February 16, 2013 Share Posted February 16, 2013 240hr storm or bust. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.