Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,588
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    LopezElliana
    Newest Member
    LopezElliana
    Joined

Febuary 22-24


Chrisjmcjr

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 821
  • Created
  • Last Reply

This is the next timeframe to watch IMO. Guidance has been suggesting for a -NAO block to establish itself over Canada, which would provide some support for a colder solution with this storm system. The overall set up is overall pretty favorable for a storm. With an active STJ still, this threat needs to be closely watched. The 12z ECMWF gave NYC 6" of so of snow from this system per the Accuweather Pro Snow Maps, and more N and W. The Upgraded GGEM also has a front end thump of snow for the area before it changes to rain.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Tonight's gfs sends it into the block and 50/50 low, which it loves to do for some reason in the long range. A lot can go wrong though, if the 50/50 is weaker or displaced or the block is weaker, then it could easier go further north and torch us. I'm not sold on this storm, I'd rather focus on any imminent threats instead. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks, CooL and earthlight. What are the synoptic features looking like on the Euro? (Miller A, phasing, vorts, etc.) Any possible analogs?

 

I really have no idea lol.  All i know is the setup is real, and the blocking showing up is really good. After the storm, both the euro and gfs continue the -NAO.

 

Euro has a classssic block at the end

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I wonder why no one else is mentioning this great run of the Euro, even in the other regional forums.

probably because of exactly what the next post states,  it's a week out.   these great storms and patterns are always a week to 10 days out.  look at what all the models were saying last weekend about this upcoming weekend. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You gotta love the significant winter storm potential with the STJ, closed low, and CAD for accumulating snows.

Agreed. As modeled, I think this is the best set up of the winter for big time snows.

But the models have not been very good at keeping things consistent in this range..and this storm is still 2-3 big troughs away. So I'm not too excited yet given how much can change still.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You gotta love the significant  winter storm potential  with the STJ, closed low, and CAD for accumulating snows.

 

attachicon.gifUV_GZ_UU_VV_216_0250.gif

 

attachicon.gifQQ_GZ_UU_VV_216_0500.gif

 

attachicon.gifPT_PN_216_0000.gif

Too bad it's so far out in the future. If the blocking can really set up and the storm stays robust, it's a great pattern. Whatever can finally slow down the pattern is a plus in my book.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Agreed. As modeled, I think this is the best set up of the winter for big time snows.

But the models have not been very good at keeping things consistent in this range..and this storm is still 2-3 big troughs away. So I'm not too excited yet given how much can change still.

 

Agree. We need the actual storm and pattern to verify in a manner similar to the forecast guidance which is still a long way out.

But the potential is there if we can get the STJ, closed low, and blocking to come together for a significant winter storm.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Too bad it's so far out in the future. If the blocking can really set up and the storm stays robust, it's a great pattern. Whatever can finally slow down the pattern is a plus in my book.

 

Yeah, all you can really ask for this far out is potential. All the rest is wait and see how the pattern actually evolves as we get closer. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Too bad it's so far out in the future. If the blocking can really set up and the storm stays robust, it's a great pattern. Whatever can finally slow down the pattern is a plus in my book.

 

The interesting thing about it is that we don't really need the pattern to slow down as much as we usually would, so long as that storm ahead of it becomes the block as the medium range guidance is strongly hinting it will. The trough/vorticity for the Feb 22 storm system can then be as strong/fast as it wants underneath that block as it moves into the Central US because it will be forced to redevelop underneath it at some point. I used the GGEM below for an illustration, but you can check out the 06z GFS for another example. The trough initially is incredibly energetic and it looks like it will be a cutter straight into Wisconsin...but even being all wrapped up/strong...it is still forced underneath the blocking.

 

So it's that feature out ahead of it that is immensely important.

 

 

post-6-0-75064700-1360851645_thumb.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The GFS allows this thing to cut north of us, not buying it for a second. Gives Chicago a blizzard this run and most of New England.

Given the H5 pattern, it makes sense. The 50/50 is pretty weak so I could definitely see a more powerful low cutting to the west 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Per HM in the Philly thread:

Also, let me just, for the sake of hype (lol), say this:

If the NAO can become more defined than what, say, the GFS portrays, I am prepared to up the probability of a KU storm in our area. At this time, I am holding the idea from yesterday and still favoring something "sub KU levels" for our area but notable/significant (like a 6-12" type of snow).

Between the next set of Pac waves and NAO, there is definitely a chance this entire things trends more south and east initially before it jumps to the coast.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...