Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,599
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    ArlyDude
    Newest Member
    ArlyDude
    Joined

NNE Winter 2012-13 Thread IV


klw

Recommended Posts

Jay's totals are always unreal. 51" in the last 7 days is crazy. Skiing must be surreal.

 

Many folks who have been there lately have reported inflated snowfall amounts... apparently there is some serious concern with the cooperative observations coming out of Jay, too.  They have still gotten the most snow and usually do, but the difference may not be as large as it might seem.  The first part of that storm last week they reported a 26" storm total, and trusted sources said they traveled all around the mountain and never found anything more than like 18" (which just happens to be around the amount that Killington/Sugarbush/MRG/Bolton/Stowe/Smuggs all showed).  There are certain situations where Jay gets more, but there are also situations when they should get the same or less than others, especially in synoptic events.  To hear that the storm left around 18" made sense given that every other ski area in VT pretty much had that same amount in the synoptic portion of the storm, but they reported 26". 

 

Then on there was a night last week (Wednesday night maybe?) when Jay reported 15" overnight.  One county south there was 3-4" both here at Stowe and Smugglers Notch.  The same 3-4" fell at Sugarbush and MRG.  The ski patroller who set-up the spots where I measure snow was skiing at Jay that morning and reported 8".  Another friend who is a Jay local (and glass half-full optimist) said 8-10".  So they certainly got more snow than areas to the south (which should be expected in those situations), but not by the margin that was advertised.

 

Its really a shame because you can never really know just how much falls, but over the course of a season they definitely have the highest average snowfall.  Which is why I'm surprised they really feel the need to jack it up or not go with a conservative measurement.  My co-worker used to live and work at Jay, and said it was a big local joke that you take 25% off the snow report and get the actual value.  And that actually makes sense because then they still get more snow than everyone else, but in a more believable amount, lol.

 

Seasonal snowfall-to-date:

 

Jay Peak...342"

Smuggs...254"

Stowe...263"

Sugarbush...265

 

You be the judge, but given that this winter has sort of favored areas further south and east relative to normal, it is hard to believe that one county north of here with the same general geography (a near 4,000ft peak along the Spine of the Greens) has had 80-100 more inches of snowfall so far this season, especially considering the snowpacks are relatively similar between Mansfield and Jay.  If you map it out, you'd assume this is a winter that has certainly favored those further north, but that hasn't really been the case outside of one upslope storm where up north picked up about 3 feet compared to the 12-18" here and south.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 1.4k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

LOL at Jay.  Is the coop person there associated with the mountain at all?  Never been clear on that one.

 

Maybe we should expect higher snowfalls at Burke now, since the Jay folks bought the place.  ;)

 

Speaking of which, had a great afternoon at Burke yesterday.  The snow was terrific and I was very surprised at how much powder was still to be found in the glades there, several days after the last snowfall.

 

Chilly start here with a nice sunrise--14F.

 

Speaking of Jay and that area--where's our friend Borderwx been I wonder?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

LOL at Jay.  Is the coop person there associated with the mountain at all?  Never been clear on that one.

 

Maybe we should expect higher snowfalls at Burke now, since the Jay folks bought the place.  ;)

 

Speaking of which, had a great afternoon at Burke yesterday.  The snow was terrific and I was very surprised at how much powder was still to be found in the glades there, several days after the last snowfall.

 

Chilly start here with a nice sunrise--14F.

 

Speaking of Jay and that area--where's our friend Borderwx been I wonder?

 

Yes, it is a staff member.  I know someone who was an intern there (from the Lyndon State ski area management program) at Jay and one of his jobs was to check the high/low temperatures and stuff for the Co-Op.  I've also heard it is measured by the Night Auditor of the hotel or was done that way.  It is definitely someone affiliated with the resort.  Its similar to me reporting to the NWS like I do, but again its why I take a lot of pictures to document.  Often I attach at least a cell phone picture of the stakes or something giving a good indication of the new snow. 

 

Honestly my biggest fear is over-reporting snow... to the point that many think I can be too conservative at times.  But I'd much rather have that, then some social media revolt over inflated snowfall totals.  In general I've found the average skier over-estimates snowfall, and that's usually part of the problem.  Skiers don't pay attention to the spots that are scoured clean by the wind.  They are focusing on that side of the trail that has filled in deep...so you take that run and you are like, wow that was a ridiculous amount of snow! (Completely ignoring the fact that the other half of the trail was scoured down to only a couple inches).  You don't know unless you actually physically measure it in a sheltered, controlled location.  Just because you are skiing drifts to your thighs doesn't mean 25" fell overnight.  I can find thigh deep drifts from 4 inches of snow and the right type of wind. 

 

Anyway....

 

I've been wondering about Borderwx too... haven't heard from him since early in the winter I think.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think you're in the minority with this one, PF. ;)

I know a couple other snow reporters in the area and I trust them fully. Social media has made it so the fear is getting called out for over reporting. It is much different than snow reports in the 80s/90s where you could just make things up and no one can call you out on it. Now if its wrong, people know about it in minutes lol.

There's a reason why Sugarbush/Bolton/Stowe/Smuggs all have about the same annual snowfall this season...and then there's really only one questionable place that's 100" higher ;)

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Great discussion from TABER regarding this mid-week snow potential...

.SHORT TERM /TUESDAY NIGHT THROUGH WEDNESDAY NIGHT/...

AS OF 340 PM EDT MONDAY...FCST CHALLENGE WL BE AREAL COVERAGE/INTENSITY

OF UPSLOPE SNOW SHOWERS ON WEDS AFT INTO WEDS NIGHT. I HAVE

REVIEWED LAST WEEKENDS NON EVENT ALONG THE WESTERN SLOPES/MTNS OF

CENTRAL/NORTHERN VT AND NNY...WHILE TRYING TO DETERMINE THE

MAGNITUDE OF THIS UPCOMING POTENTIAL UPSLOPE EVENT. A COUPLE OF

DIFFERENCES...THERMAL PROFILES ARE 2 TO 5C WARMER THIS TIME...BUT

MOISTURE IS MUCH DEEPER...ESPECIALLY AFT 18Z WEDS. AFTER REVIEWING

SOME DATA WITH OUR SOO...WE BELIEVE OUR LOCAL BTV 4KM IS ONCE

AGAIN TOO AGGRESSIVE WITH LLVL RH PROFILES AND THE ASSOCIATED QPF.

SEEMS LATELY WITH THE CHANGE OF SEASONS...THIS MODEL IS STRUGGLING

WITH LLVL RH...QPF... AND ASSOCIATED BL CONDITIONS. COMPARING BACK

TRAJECTORIES FOR BOTH EVENTS...SHOW OUR AIRMASS IS COMING FROM THE

FROZEN NORTH ATLANTIC AND THIS MAY EXPLAIN THE LLVL RH PROBLEMS IN

THE MODELS. THE BTV 4KM WRF SHOWS QPF FROM 00Z WEDS THRU 00 THURS

AROUND 1.0" AT JAY PEAK AND NEAR 1.25 ATOP MOUNT MANSFIELD...WITH

NAM 12 AND GFS BTWN 0.30 AND 0.50. THINKING MOST OF THE QPF IS

OVERDONE ON TUES NIGHT/WEDS MORNING...AS A RESULT OF TOO MUCH

PROGGED LVLL RH. THE DEEPER RH THRU 700MB ARRIVES WITH S/W ENERGY

BTWN 15Z AND 18Z WEDS. ALSO...UNLIKE LAST WKNDS NON EVENT...THE

FLOW ESPECIALLY LATE WEDS INTO WEDS NIGHT...BECMS

BLOCKED...HELPING TO HOLD THE UPSLOPE PRECIP ACRS THE

MTNS...INSTEAD OF DRIFTING DOWNSTREAM. ALSO...THE SFC TO 800MB FLW

IS LIGHTER...PREVENTING THE SNOWFALL FROM ADVECTING DOWNSTREAM.

THE BEST CHC FOR ACCUMULATING SNOWFALL WL BE LATE WEDS AFTN INTO

WEDS NIGHT. BL TEMPS WL BE TOO WARM FOR SNOW ACCUMULATIONS DURING

THE DAYTIME...ESPECIALLY BELOW 1800 FT. THIS EVENT LOOKS TO BE

CONCENTRATED ALONG THE WESTERN SLOPES AND MTNS OF CENTRAL/NORTHERN

VT...WITH LIMITED SNOWFALL ANTICIPATED OUTSIDE THE MTNS AND BLW

1800 FT. THINKING 3 TO 6 INCHES WL BE POSSIBLE BY THUR

MORNING...ESPECIALLY FROM STOWE TO JAY PEAK. A 1 TO 4 INCHES WL BE

POSSIBLE ACRS THE WESTERN SLOPES FROM HUNTINGTON TO WATERBURY TO

UNDERHILL AND PARTS OF THE DACKS. OTHERWISE...A DUSTING TO AN INCH

WL BE POSSIBLE IN THE VALLEYS WEDS NIGHT. WL ONCE AGAIN TRY TO

SHOW A SHARP PRECIP/POP AND QPF GRADIENT IN THE GRIDS TO HIGHLIGHT

THIS MESOSCALE EVENT. OTHERWISE...TEMPS WL BE IN THE U20S TO M30S

MTNS TO UPPER 30S/L40S IN THE VALLEYS ON WEDS...WITH LOWS MAINLY

IN THE 20S.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm guessing these are Co-op reports.  Either way, they're obviously low.  Jay Peak may report from the base, and mansfield from their coffee can on top.  Food for thought:

 

VT Snowfall:

http://www.wrcc.dri.edu/htmlfiles/vt/vt.sno.html

 

Precip

http://www.wrcc.dri.edu/htmlfiles/vt/vt.ppt.html

 

Temp

http://www.wrcc.dri.edu/htmlfiles/vt/vt.avg.html

 

 

NH snowfall, for comparison

http://www.wrcc.dri.edu/htmlfiles/nh/nh.sno.html

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Could we be looking at another powder day Thursday?

I might make the trip up to jay with ruler in hand.

 

 

Indeed, tomorrow into Thursday looks like the biggest snow potential this week – Mt. Mansfield point forecast for the upcoming days:

 

26MAR13A.jpg

 

Thus far I haven’t seen that any big accumulations are expected, but when it comes to the Greens you never know.  The GFS, ECMWF, and NAM all show something on the WunderMap®, it probably just depends on whether the Greens make it go to town or not.

 

I’m certainly ready for the next round of snow, but the weekend skiing was fantastic.  I haven’t posted anything yet, but we’ve got full reports from Saturday at Bolton Valley and Sunday at Stowe; even down to the 2,000’ level at Bolton I was getting settled powder depths of around 22 inches above the subsurface in areas that hadn’t been visited since the recent snows.  I’ve added in a few weekend pictures below:

 

23MAR13A.jpg

 

23MAR13E.jpg

 

23MAR13D.jpg

 

24MAR13A.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm heading up to Mt snow April 13-14, think they'll still have most terrain open? I haven't been up north all year unfortunately. Don't they usually shut down that time of year? Got 2 free tix and its the only time I can go

As far as I know most of the major ski areas are going at least through April 14 and a bunch through April 21 (at lest published scheduled close dates). We should see some late ones this year too. Though always important to note, there is no other industry where the fine print of "subject to change" should be emphasized as much as the ski industry lol.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As far as I know most of the major ski areas are going at least through April 14 and a bunch through April 21 (at lest published scheduled close dates). We should see some late ones this year too. Though always important to note, there is no other industry where the fine print of "subject to change" should be emphasized as much as the ski industry lol.

Haha, that is a good point.  If the weather turns cold again as it looks like it might, I imagine it will be fine.  Throw a few storms in and we have mid winter base depths

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Rain showers 39, forgot there was even going to be any precipitation tonight as I've almost checked out in the wanting snow department.

Interesting trajectory on the radar, too bad it wasn't cooler, as it "looks" pretty decent on the radar loop. Could've probably salvaged a 1-3" event out of it, had it been a few degrees lower.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...