bluewave Posted February 12, 2013 Share Posted February 12, 2013 ...... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dabize Posted February 12, 2013 Share Posted February 12, 2013 Seems like a bit better fit than the postglacial isostatic rebound uplift/depression idea, which explains the distribution OK (Chesapeake worse than NE) but doesn't account for the time course very well (not sudden enough). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TerryM Posted February 14, 2013 Share Posted February 14, 2013 " 0.6 to 2.0 feet above normal" I'd have thought that 2 ft above normal tides would have made some waves in the media. The effect on barrier islands, estuaries and fishing grounds must have been noticed. Could this be related to the disappearance of Odden's Tongue in the Greenland Sea in the late '90s? Terry Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.