Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,607
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    NH8550
    Newest Member
    NH8550
    Joined

WidreMann told us it was gonna snow thread


LithiaWx

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 2.7k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

The WV is making me think we might have a bigger deal as the day goes on. The energy  in the plains looks to be diving in a north to south direction and it is farther west. What this may mean is we might have a bigger storm and it may be delayed for a few hours and slower. I don't have a dog in the fight so it really doesn't effect me, but those to the east of the Triad, Char., Columbia, and eastern Ga. thing just got a lot better for you guys in my opinion.

 

http://www.goes.noaa.gov/GSSLOOPS/ecwv.html

 

Very good catch. It's really about watching in real time now. Let's see if we can get a last minute move slightly west to help more out. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am not so sure a Lee trough is entirely a good thing when it comes to BL issues.

 

That's my part two issue with this event; even if we do get a good amount of moisture it comes in mid afternoon with highest temps of the day.  It's rain changing to snow with above freezing surface temps.  Slushy dusting at the end.  What is that a slushting? 

 

Ok I'll shut up now, I'm just really itching for a good snowstorm.  On to the pattern thread I go...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Really interesting and, I think, significant trend being shown on the RAP which is dramatically weakening the Texas s/w vs. prior runs.

 

Here is 12z RAP at 16 hours:

post-1293-0-09692900-1360955863_thumb.pn

 

 

Now, here is the recent 18z RAP at 10 hours:

post-1293-0-69406600-1360955900_thumb.pn

 

You will also note, if you toggle between the two, what is clearly an earlier move toward a neutral tilt in the more recent RAP run.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Really interesting and, I think, significant trend being shown on the RAP which is dramatically weakening the Texas s/w vs. prior runs.

 

Here is 12z RAP at 16 hours:

attachicon.gifRapstrongone.png

 

 

Now, here is the recent 18z RAP at 10 hours:

attachicon.gifRAPweakone.png

 

You will also note, if you toggle between the two, what is clearly an earlier move toward a neutral tilt in the more recent RAP run.

 

The northern energy is significantly weaker on the 18z RAP however in the end I think the tilt is enough that is more moisture associated with it than at the end of the 17z run. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Really interesting and, I think, significant trend being shown on the RAP which is dramatically weakening the Texas s/w vs. prior runs.

 

 

 

You will also note, if you toggle between the two, what is clearly an earlier move toward a neutral tilt in the more recent RAP run.

It might be that they are phasing sooner thus weakening the Texas s/w. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Interesting.  I thought there might be some watches for at least areas NE of RDU.

 

Still a little too much uncertainty to pin down specific products....plus there's still a little time to work with.

 

 

Matthew -- what is significant (if any) of the RAP trend to weaken the Texas s/w sooner? Let's just assume the RAP is sniffing something out there.

As you know, the orientation of the trough is the biggest factor really. It's tough to tell what the RAP is doing....these are fairly subtle areas of vorticity we are looking at. If the TX vort were to just be slightly quicker, the trough goes neg tilt faster and you get a bigger system. If the TX vort is slower, the opposite.

 

If it weakens a ton, you wind up with less phasing, but it might have a different impact on the trough orientation.

 

Very tough to say at this point...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 SREF clearly going negative tilt faster -- the impact on QPF, however, is to shift the main axis of heavier precip east. Actually, the area of .25 is expanded a bit west, but the westernmost edge of the .1+ QPF collapses back toward the east. It's funny because the 700 RH field looked a little juicier. Oh well, who knows ....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We are heading to Boone tonight to visit some friends. He told me they weren't really expecting anything from this system. Looks like most of the precip will be far east of Boone. For all of you mets out there does this seem pretty accurate? Looks like Boone will be about 100 miles too far west to catch anything other than token flurries.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...