Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,609
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    NH8550
    Newest Member
    NH8550
    Joined

V-day snow threat (THE GAINES BOMBER) ( Forecast/ Model/Discussion thread)


Mitchell Gaines

Recommended Posts

Well the pattern right now doesn't support suppression, and even if we trend further north, I think the s/w is juicy enough to produce 3" at minimum. Temperatures are entirely dynamically driven, and the model solutions w/ stronger vv's will obviously mean less BL problems.

Agree with this, confluence should help with the North tug as well. Temps will be an issue at the bl, but those strong vv's should help overcome this just North of the PA/DE border.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 400
  • Created
  • Last Reply

This system somewhat reminds me of the 2/1 clipper event that produced a banded feature that dumped 6-8 inches from central DE to Cape May County, NJ. While that one had much colder air in place and therefore higher ratios, this upcoming system looks dynamic enough to fire off a ribbon of focused frontogenetic forcing. If we can get the thermal gradient to tighten up some more, then this forcing would be even stronger. Have to watch these quick moving systems as they can certainly overperform especially if the forcing becomes rather focused. Of course the thermal profiles need to be right as well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This system somewhat reminds me of the 2/1 clipper event that produced a banded feature that dumped 6-8 inches from central DE to Cape May County, NJ. While that one had much colder air in place and therefore higher ratios, this upcoming system looks dynamic enough to fire off a ribbon of focused frontogenetic forcing. If we can get the thermal gradient to tighten up some more, then this forcing would be even stronger. Have to watch these quick moving systems as they can certainly overperform especially if the forcing becomes rather focused. Of course the thermal profiles need to be right as well.

And someone would get screwed jobbered with that set up lol.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Do you have to be negative? LOL.

 

Banding is neat to watch unfold though. The 2/1 event was, as Walt and I were seeing it evolve in front of our eyes early that morning.

in 10' it was awesome, saturday, naso much. lol.

All joking aside, its awesome to see those bands form. Sucks when you're on the wrong side of them though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Can we finally get a Villanova/SE PA jackpot storm? Feel like we haven't seen one of those since the 2009-10 winter. Sick of seeing New England and NJ jackpot while I'm here. I'm thinking 3-6" is a virtual lock at this point for us, with potential for 6"+.

I hear ya dude. 3-6" here looking good at Mt. Villanova. Possible 6" we'll see if the gfs come in wetter but NAM was a solid 3-6".

Link to comment
Share on other sites

WHile the precip cut back on this run, we'd have a better fluff factor. Without looking @ raw numbers, 850 temps are below -4 most of the event except coastal NJ sections. Nothing crazy, but we wouldn't waste too much on a wet paste. Anyhow, enough dissecting the 0z NAM @48-57 hours.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...