psuhoffman Posted February 14, 2013 Share Posted February 14, 2013 Why not just post that instead of one of your usual 10 line diatribes? because some people like intellectual discourse and logical analysis and not just mindless dribble PS: when I am skimming through these threads, I actually gravitate towards a post that has some content too it, not just a quick one liner. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
psuhoffman Posted February 14, 2013 Share Posted February 14, 2013 I was kind of surprised that he was even predicting the event was going to be ice for us. Really? The whole thing can blow up at any time. We know this all too well. I am not sure he is predicting "ice" for us. When he talks about VA and NC he usually means Richmond and Raleigh. It is hard to say what he "thinks" for our area since he mentions PA as being snow, and his area as an ice threat. Probably means snow to ice type thing for us. Either way its so far out its crazy to even give details like that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
psuhoffman Posted February 14, 2013 Share Posted February 14, 2013 Dribble? Clearly nothing intellectual to be found here I don't know what is worse, you reading posts that you find worthless, or then taking the time to post and complain about the posts you didn't have to read in the first place that you feel were a waste of your time, and then picking a fight with the person who is making those posts. I enjoy this, its a release for me. Just because I left the meterology field does not mean I have less passion for it and this board gives me the chance to satisfy the part of me that wishes I had stayed in meterology. I also love to debate things, I even coach debate at my school. So this is fun for me, I enjoy this community, and generally like reading what others have to say and hopefully contributing to it as well. Why you would continue to read posts of your own free will that apparently you find no value in and that annoy you, then waste more of your time complaining about, and trying to censor the author of said posts...is beyond me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stormtracker Posted February 14, 2013 Share Posted February 14, 2013 GFS, lol Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stormtracker Posted February 14, 2013 Share Posted February 14, 2013 Wasn't he and Larry Cosgrove both calling for an arctic blast Feb 2-4 then changed to a torch and then dropped the ball on the blizzard LMAO. I know LC was for a fact b/c he debated me on it in a broadcast met group...SMH Cosgrove is horrible Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
psuhoffman Posted February 14, 2013 Share Posted February 14, 2013 GFS, lol ah darnit does that mean I have to go look Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yeoman Posted February 14, 2013 Share Posted February 14, 2013 GFS, lol Nice! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stormtracker Posted February 14, 2013 Share Posted February 14, 2013 ah darnit does that mean I have to go look yeah, 57-63 hour Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ravensrule Posted February 14, 2013 Share Posted February 14, 2013 GFS, lol I am on my phone and my eyes are bleeding, what is the lol?. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yeoman Posted February 14, 2013 Share Posted February 14, 2013 I don't know what is worse, you reading posts that you find worthless, or then taking the time to post and complain about the posts you didn't have to read in the first place that you feel were a waste of your time, and then picking a fight with the person who is making those posts. I enjoy this, its a release for me. Just because I left the meterology field does not mean I have less passion for it and this board gives me the chance to satisfy the part of me that wishes I had stayed in meterology. I also love to debate things, I even coach debate at my school. So this is fun for me, I enjoy this community, and generally like reading what others have to say and hopefully contributing to it as well. Why you would continue to read posts of your own free will that apparently you find no value in and that annoy you, then waste more of your time complaining about, and trying to censor the author of said posts...is beyond me. Your posts are way too wordy for the point you're trying to make.. Most people would not bothering reading.. Take that for what it's worth Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stormtracker Posted February 14, 2013 Share Posted February 14, 2013 Nice! This period may need to be watched more carefully. NAM is different, UK is different than NAM...GFS is different than both. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stormtracker Posted February 14, 2013 Share Posted February 14, 2013 I am on my phone and my eyes are bleeding, what is the lol?. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yeoman Posted February 14, 2013 Share Posted February 14, 2013 I am on my phone and my eyes are bleeding, what is the lol?. It shows 2 ft Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ravensrule Posted February 14, 2013 Share Posted February 14, 2013 It shows 2 ft Nice try Randy beat you to it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ACFD FIREMAN Posted February 14, 2013 Share Posted February 14, 2013 Your posts are way too wordy for the point you're trying to make.. Most people would not bothering reading.. Take that for what it's worth I dont. Paragraphs are real Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ravensrule Posted February 14, 2013 Share Posted February 14, 2013 I am on my phone and my eyes are bleeding, what is the lol?. Thanks, I am sure surface temps will screw us again though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yeoman Posted February 14, 2013 Share Posted February 14, 2013 This period may need to be watched more carefully. NAM is different, UK is different than NAM...GFS is different than both. The trough is sharp.. the ASCII index is high 12500 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Buddy1987 Posted February 14, 2013 Share Posted February 14, 2013 . This period may need to be watched more carefully. NAM is different, UK is different than NAM...GFS is different than both. Yea Nam had it further north with a good hit on PA it would be nice to have the GFS verify for everyone. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
yoda Posted February 14, 2013 Author Share Posted February 14, 2013 Thanks, I am sure surface temps will screw us again though. That was teh 2m surface temp map Randy posted Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bari Posted February 14, 2013 Share Posted February 14, 2013 So? to point it simply according to DT, either the -NAO and 50/50 low placement are incorrect, or the 22nd low placement is incorrect and we'll just have to wait and see which one changes first? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TUweathermanDD Posted February 14, 2013 Share Posted February 14, 2013 That was teh 2m surface temp map Randy posted Its easy to tell with the barbs, waiting for resulting Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ravensrule Posted February 14, 2013 Share Posted February 14, 2013 That was teh 2m surface temp map Randy posted My bad I am exhausted. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
yoda Posted February 14, 2013 Author Share Posted February 14, 2013 Its easy to tell with the barbs, waiting for resulting Its .3-.4 QPF... not sure where its coming from as i dont see any h5 energy nearby... WAA? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ravensrule Posted February 14, 2013 Share Posted February 14, 2013 Its easy to tell with the barbs, waiting for resulting , I am going to sleep before any other models ruin my dreams. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TUweathermanDD Posted February 14, 2013 Share Posted February 14, 2013 Its .3-.4 QPF... not sure where its coming from as i dont see any h5 energy nearby... WAA? I'd think so, no vort on the map so its sketchy, but it does "amplify" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
swva Posted February 14, 2013 Share Posted February 14, 2013 GFS just pulled me back in.. 48 hours away and pops a nice little storm. Temps down this way much better than last storm. NAM has the storm to but has it much further north. Model Mayem continues. And I thought I would get some sleep over the next few nights. This hobby is exhausting. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ACFD FIREMAN Posted February 14, 2013 Share Posted February 14, 2013 Its .3-.4 QPF... not sure where its coming from as i dont see any h5 energy nearby... WAA? .4-.5 for dc. Ghost vort ftw! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TUweathermanDD Posted February 14, 2013 Share Posted February 14, 2013 I would say after the nice heavy rates tonight im satisfied. I am, but I love this hobby no matter how disappointing. Need a band leader? Bob chill said all in on 22, but he cant, he has nothing to put in. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
psuhoffman Posted February 14, 2013 Share Posted February 14, 2013 Your posts are way too wordy for the point you're trying to make.. Most people would not bothering reading.. Take that for what it's worth That is my style. I like to offer analysis and not just the final sound bite, and I appreciate when others do the same. I love when HM, Wes, Ian or several others offer lenghty insights into their thought process and how they analyze a situation. It gives more then just a forecast, but its a learning experience when they share that. THere is a place on here for quick comments but there is also a place for real discourse as well. The way I post is just my style, take it or leave it. I have no problem if anyone decides not to read my comments because they are too long but I am not going to offer less analysis because a few people do not like to read. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TUweathermanDD Posted February 14, 2013 Share Posted February 14, 2013 Upon second look it is "anafrontal" of sorts, a trailing lp to form and ride behind the cold front which will assist us with temps a bit Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.