Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,752
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    Sasonah
    Newest Member
    Sasonah
    Joined

February 2013 mid-long range disco thread Part 2


yoda

Recommended Posts

2"

 

Usually in the crappy winters we eek out a fluke at some point or at least one 3" event...which may not make it a fluke I guess

 

March 99

Feb 06 (though we did have some good snow 11/23 - 12/15)

March 09

Feb 95

January 02

December 07

 

It is actually pretty hard for us to get <4".....which has kind of kept me hopeful...obviously peristence is a b**ch...68-69, one of my analogs, is actually not bad in some ways....same thing that year....2 KU's for 40N in FEB and we had 2" going into March where we then got a couple storms and ended up with 9"...There are 4 things still keeping me hopeful

 

1) Pattern is not that hostile going forward

2) Climo says it is really hard to get 2" seasonal

3) Analogs suggested a decent end of season

4) Wishcasting, figuring if I am delusional it is only for another month and then I can recover

I would also imagine that climo says it is really hard to get 2" of snow, two winters in a row.  Next week seems like a good window for something, but given how things have gone this winter, it's hard to be optimistic.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 1.6k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

We have to start paying attention to the GGEM I suppose... 4DVAR and better resolution. 

 

What about the NAVGEM NOVAforecaster was talking about? It's a real thing, when does the switch occur?

models are always being upgraded and tweaked, so are the US models.  NAM is due for an upgrade soon, not sure about the GFS.  Either way, until the upgrades go operational and we have verification scores to show it, I am skeptical of any "major leap" in accuracy from these marginal models. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

there are a number of ways to spin it to work for or against us...I'd be more worried we were turning into Richmond if I didnt get 68" of snow 3 years ago....

I am far from an expert, but it just seems like recently we get very few of the small storms that we used to get here all the time when i was a kid. The good news is it seems like the larger and KU storms will be much more frequent than in the past.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

there are a number of ways to spin it to work for or against us...I'd be more worried we were turning into Richmond if I didnt get 68" of snow 3 years ago....

You would have to think that that we're due for a good winter in at least one of the next two or three winters.  And by good, I mean average (which would be good after last winter and this).  It's interesting that we've had two abysmal winters in a row, but with fairly different patterns.  This year we haven't had the persistent GOA low (and Nina) which in part gave us the incredibly warm winter and spring last year.  We've had a few windows with colder air this winter, that we didn't have last.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

most of us don't use them properly anyway

sometimes the upgrades make it harder for me to use them as an effective tool for a while.  No matter how good, none of them are going to be perfect.  After a while I can get a feel for how the various guidance handles different situations and then how to correct for those issues.  When they go and "correct" things, it can throw off my feel for how the model is behaving.  I am sure the pro mets are able to stay current on all the changes and bias modifications but sometimes I am not, and thus learn from trial and error.  Consistency is just as important to me as accuracy.  If a model is wrong, but is always wrong in the same general way, it can be a useful tool.  If it is inconsistent in how it is wrong, then it can be darn near useless. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Matt will be distraught to lose his biggest competitor.

ill tell all my followers to follow his page. I get too emotional. I am have preaching the VD storm since Feb 2 and i was determined to see it go through. Even called 2-4 inches 2 days ago in the colder suburbs.

I had to punt last night and it sucked

Link to comment
Share on other sites

ill tell all my followers to follow his page. I get too emotional. I am have preaching the VD storm since Feb 2 and i was determined to see it go through. Even called 2-4 inches 2 days ago in the colder suburbs.

I had to punt last night and it sucked

 

No. Really?  You?  I don't think anyone had ever noticed.

 

;)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

ill tell all my followers to follow his page. I get too emotional. I am have preaching the VD storm since Feb 2 and i was determined to see it go through. Even called 2-4 inches 2 days ago in the colder suburbs.

I had to punt last night and it sucked

 

What are you going to do if the colder burbs get 2-4?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

ill tell all my followers to follow his page. I get too emotional. I am have preaching the VD storm since Feb 2 and i was determined to see it go through. Even called 2-4 inches 2 days ago in the colder suburbs.

I had to punt last night and it sucked

You get to emotionally invested in these storms and you make calls that you would not rationally do otherwise.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Euro ens mean looks like the op except for making more sense. Like 1-3" in the front end instead of 4-8".

This is for the d9 storm that isn't going to happen like this anyway.

I haven't seen the Euro of course, but the setup on this 18z run of the GFS, a storm that tries to cut and can't, is a setup that's pretty dependable for a good "winter" storm, more so for my area than for you.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I haven't seen the Euro of course, but the setup on this 18z run of the GFS, a storm that tries to cut and can't, is a setup that's pretty dependable for a good "winter" storm, more so for my area than for you.

 

If you saw the euro you would would be running naked down your street

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There are other things on that map that should probably tell you that that vort isn't going much farther north...if that map were right.

Yeah. Maybe I'm just confused by mant running big as usual. Could definitely see it end up way east initially before jump etc.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...