Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,583
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    23Yankee
    Newest Member
    23Yankee
    Joined

Feb 13: The little storm that could (for some)


Ian

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 1.5k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

GFS blues us all pretty good. Comes down to changeover time and how much is left. 

 

no way the soundings are that good on this run around here imo. .1" of wet snow isn't going to cut it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm not sure parsing models makes that much sense now. they probably won't pick up on dynamics

 

Well put. It's a lock we start as rain. The comma'ish feature is the make or break. Hires nam shows some nice but small banding as it moves through wv. Good indication that the nam thinks the cold side of the low will be modestly dynamic. 

 

It's pretty likely the jackpot with be a relatively small area. Temps favor n-w but the backside of the low doesn't care. It's going move some bands through wherever it wants. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Does the EURO even matter today for this storm?  Just curious.  Seems like we are hugging the NAM for all it's worth? 

 

euro always matters. If it comes in significantly weaker and drier then you have to consider it. If it comes in similar then we have consensus. Which would be nice. Then we can just dissect dynamics instead of freaking out over the track. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah...I'm not sure.  The fundamental physics are the same.  Maybe someone can jump in with specific (and more accurate) details.  The initial conditions (in the form of RAOBs, surface obs, etc...) are generally at a coarser resolution than the model gridding.  Doubly so with the hi-res NAM.  So, those values are interpolated to a finer mesh and then the model is run forward.  IMO, the hi-res is good for terrain-related questions (CAD, LEF, etc...) but doesn't really buy us much here.  

Actually, it depends on what people are referring to when they say "Hi-Res NAM".  The NAM is actually run as a complex set of nested models, including the 12km parent nest (the usual NAM, huge, nearly hemispheric domain)....but then there are several one-way nests that are run inside of it (the 4km CONUS nest, which is what I assume people refer to as the Hi-Res NAM, Alaska nest, relocatable 1.5 km fire wx nest etc.).  The initial conditions are not that much coarser than the 12 km resolution, IIRC, but they do use an "unfilled grid", so it may be something like half of the spatial resolution as the model....but you're right about the 4km nest (it's essentially just interpolated/scaled down to that grid).

 

However, there are also the Hi-Res window runs (NMM and ARW), which are separate from the nested NAM runs......and I think these are just initialized from the NAM ics (interpolated down).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...