Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,609
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    NH8550
    Newest Member
    NH8550
    Joined

Feb 13: The little storm that could (for some)


Ian

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 1.5k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

HiRes NAM has the changeover at around 23z, after about 0.25" of rain.  Surface temps around 36 at DCA falling to 34 by 00z and 33 by 03z.  Looks like about another 0.25" of precip falls after changeover.  850 low skirts DCA to the south.

 

I will be the weenie... ratios would be like what? 7-1?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

HiRes NAM has the changeover at around 23z, after about 0.25" of rain.  Surface temps around 36 at DCA falling to 34 by 00z and 33 by 03z.  Looks like about another 0.25" of precip falls after changeover.  850 low skirts DCA to the south.

If DCA gets 0.25" of QPF with surface temps above freezing, I'm guessing they report about 0.4" of snow.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I will be the weenie... ratios would be like what? 7-1?

 

Not sure.  Not good, I can surmise that.

 

If DCA gets 0.25" of QPF with surface temps above freezing, I'm guessing they report about 0.4" of snow.  

 

NAM precip * 0.5 (QPF adjustment factor) * 0.5 (surface temps) * 0.5 (DCA reporting) * 7 (ratio) = 0.2" snowfall

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Had a feeling this would trend colder. I bet 18Z will be even better.

If we get a NAM/GFS type solution with a nice slug of precip in the cold sector, it would be really hard not to get at least some snow in mid february.  My fear would be a euro solution where the thing is just too weak and strung out to develop any appreciable cold sector precip.  Light wont do it.  We need the "thump" scenario.  I am leaning towards the american guidance, but even in a year when the euro has had its troubles you can never feel too confident when its staring you down like this and saying NO.  Frankly in a year like this I can never be too confident even if all the guidance is saying yes.  BUt if we do get the vort to track south of us, and the stronger more amped solutions are correct I feel we do ok, I want the more dynamic solution and we can take our chances on the thermals.  ANd I mean that for the whole area, not just my location.  I would love to get a delay out of this in Baltimore. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...