hm8 Posted February 11, 2013 Share Posted February 11, 2013 go Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
snowstormcanuck Posted February 11, 2013 Share Posted February 11, 2013 The few GEFS members that showed a storm around D6-7 at 12z lost it at 18z. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Geos Posted February 11, 2013 Share Posted February 11, 2013 GFS shows a snowstorm for 204-226hrs, for a good chunk of the subforum - especially areas that haven't seen much snow lately. Couple Clipper like systems Friday-Sunday. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
michsnowfreak Posted February 11, 2013 Share Posted February 11, 2013 Some good discussion at the end of the part 3 thread regarding the stj and stuff. A bomb track to CLE would be, well, the bomb Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Harry Posted February 11, 2013 Share Posted February 11, 2013 GGEM trying to crank, doesn't quite get there fully. Tries to get cranking with what? The Thurs system? The model is only at 12z Thurs for me? Is there a better/quicker site for that model? Thanks. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Geos Posted February 11, 2013 Share Posted February 11, 2013 Looks like an occluding type storm on the GGEM. Next week Harry. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chicago WX Posted February 11, 2013 Share Posted February 11, 2013 Looks like an occluding type storm on the GGEM. Next week Harry. No, the storm in the 120-144 hour range on the GGEM. That's the one angry is talking about. It annihilates Toronto. Link for Harry: http://meteocentre.com/models/models.php?lang=en&map=na&run=00&mod=gemglb Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Harry Posted February 11, 2013 Share Posted February 11, 2013 Looks like an occluding type storm on the GGEM. Next week Harry. Blah.. Track it another 100/150 miles further south and then we will be talking. Granted it is slightly further south vs 12z but ala it is more progressive it seems as well. Can never win eh? lol Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chicago WX Posted February 11, 2013 Share Posted February 11, 2013 And for the 120-144 hour storm, 0z UKie has another SNE bomb. Goody. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Harry Posted February 11, 2013 Share Posted February 11, 2013 No, the storm in the 120-144 hour range on the GGEM. That's the one angry is talking about. It annihilates Toronto. Link for Harry: http://meteocentre.com/models/models.php?lang=en&map=na&run=00&mod=gemglb It kinda is the same system. Difference is this run speeds up the northern energy ( passes across on Thurs ) thus the southern energy is able to track further se and thus miss us. Thus the GEM is now jumping onboard with the other models as they too have the northern energy moving a bit quicker as well. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chicago WX Posted February 11, 2013 Share Posted February 11, 2013 It kinda is the same system. Difference is this run speeds up the northern energy ( passes across on Thurs ) thus the southern energy is able to track further se and thus miss us. Thus the GEM is now jumping onboard with the other models as they too have the northern energy moving a bit quicker as well. The 228 hour map Geos posted isn't the same storm, thus my response. I'm pretty sure angry was talking about the one before (120-144 hours). If not, my bad. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Harry Posted February 11, 2013 Share Posted February 11, 2013 The 228 hour map Geos posted isn't the same storm, thus my response. I'm pretty sure angry was talking about the one before (120-144 hours). If not, my bad. Oh.. Kinda confused now..lol Hell the results still suck for us though and thus what really matters. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Geos Posted February 11, 2013 Share Posted February 11, 2013 I see the storm your talking about Chicago Wx. Buckeye was talking about this one. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chicago WX Posted February 11, 2013 Share Posted February 11, 2013 Oh.. Kinda confused now..lol Hell the results still suck for us though and thus what really matters. lol, yeah doesn't what storm we're talking about right? Either a whiff or a rainstorm. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chicago WX Posted February 11, 2013 Share Posted February 11, 2013 I see the storm your talking about Chicago Wx. Buckeye was talking about this one. Yep, that's the one. Nice LES signal for Chicago. Alek will be pleased. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chicago Storm Posted February 11, 2013 Share Posted February 11, 2013 lol...GGEM. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Harry Posted February 11, 2013 Share Posted February 11, 2013 lol, yeah doesn't what storm we're talking about right? Either a whiff or a rainstorm. Now to see how the euro can torture us. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chicago WX Posted February 11, 2013 Share Posted February 11, 2013 Now to see how the euro can torture us. DC snowstorm, rainstorm, SNE snowstorm, rainstorm. Then spring arrives. Oops, wrong thread. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Harry Posted February 11, 2013 Share Posted February 11, 2013 DC snowstorm, rainstorm, SNE snowstorm, rainstorm. Then spring arrives. Oops, wrong thread. Ha.. And out to 138hrs the euro is pretty blah for all. That southern system scoots off the se cost quietly. Then ofcourse we have the dry clipper. I would rather see the Plains get buried as that would atleast help the drought and help keep the crazy heat away come summer. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
snowstormcanuck Posted February 11, 2013 Share Posted February 11, 2013 lol @ 6z GFS. Just a small continuity gap there. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stebo Posted February 11, 2013 Share Posted February 11, 2013 lol @ 6z GFS. Just a small continuity gap there. Yeah, just lets you know how volatile this pattern truly is right now, all it takes is a phase and boom. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
snowstormcanuck Posted February 11, 2013 Share Posted February 11, 2013 Yeah, just lets you know how volatile this pattern truly is right now, all it takes is a phase and boom. Large scale setup looks primed for something big, it's just the smaller details that can make the difference between who gets the spoils (OTS/EC/Apps/Lakes) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
snowstormcanuck Posted February 11, 2013 Share Posted February 11, 2013 Potent jet stream cresting the H3 ridge out west. It's the 84 hr NAM but what the hell. Maybe we can build on the 6z GFS: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
toronto blizzard Posted February 11, 2013 Share Posted February 11, 2013 Potent jet stream cresting the H3 ridge out west. It's the 84 hr NAM but what the hell. Maybe we can build on the 6z GFS: I like this potential as well as next week. Me thinks the pattern will be stormy over the next 10 days and that could produce another snow event here. We'll see. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
snowstormcanuck Posted February 11, 2013 Share Posted February 11, 2013 I like this potential as well as next week. Me thinks the pattern will be stormy over the next 10 days and that could produce another snow event here. We'll see. I thought having a big snowstorm would satisfy me. Just the opposite. Makes me crave another one even more. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
toronto blizzard Posted February 11, 2013 Share Posted February 11, 2013 I thought having a big snowstorm would satisfy me. Just the opposite. Makes me crave another one even more. You can never have enough snowstorms. Honestly though if we get another 1 or 2 6"+ storms I will be more than happy and ready for spring and baseball. Like the sig BTW maybe they"ll win this year. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chicago WX Posted February 11, 2013 Share Posted February 11, 2013 12z GFS looks good for the weekend system...if you live in OK and AR. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cyclone77 Posted February 11, 2013 Share Posted February 11, 2013 12z GFS looks good for the weekend system...if you live in OK and AR. Yeah looks pretty dry for most of us through the next 7-9 days. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chicago WX Posted February 11, 2013 Share Posted February 11, 2013 Yeah looks pretty dry for most of us through the next 7-9 days. Seems so. Wouldn't completely give up in the eastern Lakes/OV, but the rest of us are cooked for awhile. GFS gonna hammer the MA/NE. They need more snow. EDIT: and another rainmaker for here following that. So not completely dry. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
toronto blizzard Posted February 11, 2013 Share Posted February 11, 2013 Heavy pattern coming up Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.