Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,606
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    ArlyDude
    Newest Member
    ArlyDude
    Joined

blizzard of 2013 discussion


forkyfork

Recommended Posts

http://mag.ncep.noaa.gov/Image.php?model=gfs&area=namer&param=850_vort_ht&cycle=12ℑ=gfs%2F12%2Fgfs_namer_000_850_vort_ht.gif

That is the gfs position of the low now...looks identical to where it really is actually

It has been officially documented that it initialized too SE and was weak by 7mb, it really matters not what it shows after that in any aspect.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 1.6k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

From HM in Philly thread

"All models agree that between 18z-21z, the northward motion of the southern stream s/w ends and the kick east happens. The initial "repelling" is common before a partial phase. It doesn't mean a whole heck of a lot for Boston but this is why major snowfall will not happen NYC and SW. "

Link to comment
Share on other sites

From HM in Philly thread

"All models agree that between 18z-21z, the northward motion of the southern stream s/w ends and the kick east happens. The initial "repelling" is common before a partial phase. It doesn't mean a whole heck of a lot for Boston but this is why major snowfall will not happen NYC and SW. "

yikes....

 

lets see how many people in this thread acknowledge this post by HM

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I like this from Albany:

 

THERE IS SOME RAIN ON THE SOUTHERN PERIPHERY OF THE NORTHERN
STREAM SYSTEM ALSO IN PARTS OF WESTERN PA AND EASTERN OH. BASED
ON THE MEAN FLOW SEEN IN 12Z UPPER DATA...THE AXIS OF THE HEAVIEST
SNOW MAY BE SHIFTING EVER SO SLIGHTLY MORE WEST AND NORTH THAN
CURRENT FORECAST. LOTS OF CONVECTION OFF THE CAROLINAS WHICH COULD
CONTINUE THE ENHANCED DOWNSTREAM UPPER RIDGING THAT COULD SHIFT
THE SURFACE LOW TRACK AND ASSOCIATED RAIN/SNOW LINE AND DYNAMICS
JUST A SLIGHT HAIR WEST AND NORTH OF CURRENT FORECAST.
 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

From HM in Philly thread

"All models agree that between 18z-21z, the northward motion of the southern stream s/w ends and the kick east happens. The initial "repelling" is common before a partial phase. It doesn't mean a whole heck of a lot for Boston but this is why major snowfall will not happen NYC and SW. "

. If that happens and ill take hm's word for it, one of the best mets I've ever seen, that will really screw areas west and northwest of NYC big time.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

yikes....

lets see how many people in this thread acknowledge this post by HM

Here is his next post

It was never really something you thought would happen anyway, so don't let it take you down. Things to look forward to are the frontogen bands. There is a very strong signal in the mid levels for positive frontogen 3z-9z from NE PA / NY down into SE PA / C NJ. Also, we have a saturated CSI layer, per 12z NAM, during the first portion of the night when wair air advection and LLJ is present (mainly before 4z). The snow accumulations are going to be funny with north to south based maximums where these bands develop and drift southward.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I like this from Albany:

 

THERE IS SOME RAIN ON THE SOUTHERN PERIPHERY OF THE NORTHERN

STREAM SYSTEM ALSO IN PARTS OF WESTERN PA AND EASTERN OH. BASED

ON THE MEAN FLOW SEEN IN 12Z UPPER DATA...THE AXIS OF THE HEAVIEST

SNOW MAY BE SHIFTING EVER SO SLIGHTLY MORE WEST AND NORTH THAN

CURRENT FORECAST. LOTS OF CONVECTION OFF THE CAROLINAS WHICH COULD

CONTINUE THE ENHANCED DOWNSTREAM UPPER RIDGING THAT COULD SHIFT

THE SURFACE LOW TRACK AND ASSOCIATED RAIN/SNOW LINE AND DYNAMICS

JUST A SLIGHT HAIR WEST AND NORTH OF CURRENT FORECAST.

 

That would be awesome for us up here in the NW.. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It all stems back to poor initialization and the complete ignorance of that is what will continue to doom the model. The NAM on the other hand is just a complete joke.

 

I am sure that there are people lower down in the power structure that care, but they must not have any say on what goes

on at the top. We would have never landed on the moon if we had the same attitude back in the 60's.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I like this from Albany:

 

THERE IS SOME RAIN ON THE SOUTHERN PERIPHERY OF THE NORTHERN

STREAM SYSTEM ALSO IN PARTS OF WESTERN PA AND EASTERN OH. BASED

ON THE MEAN FLOW SEEN IN 12Z UPPER DATA...THE AXIS OF THE HEAVIEST

SNOW MAY BE SHIFTING EVER SO SLIGHTLY MORE WEST AND NORTH THAN

CURRENT FORECAST. LOTS OF CONVECTION OFF THE CAROLINAS WHICH COULD

CONTINUE THE ENHANCED DOWNSTREAM UPPER RIDGING THAT COULD SHIFT

THE SURFACE LOW TRACK AND ASSOCIATED RAIN/SNOW LINE AND DYNAMICS

JUST A SLIGHT HAIR WEST AND NORTH OF CURRENT FORECAST.

 

Does that mean LI and NYC get more rain?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

i'd say 10-12" is major

i just hope HM is wrong...odds are against my hopeless wishing

Major to him is what Boston is getting. Are you seeing my posts? Here is what he said after

It was never really something you thought would happen anyway, so don't let it take you down. Things to look forward to are the frontogen bands. There is a very strong signal in the mid levels for positive frontogen 3z-9z from NE PA / NY down into SE PA / C NJ. Also, we have a saturated CSI layer, per 12z NAM, during the first portion of the night when wair air advection and LLJ is present (mainly before 4z). The snow accumulations are going to be funny with north to south based maximums where these bands develop and drift southward.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Here is his next post

It was never really something you thought would happen anyway, so don't let it take you down. Things to look forward to are the frontogen bands. There is a very strong signal in the mid levels for positive frontogen 3z-9z from NE PA / NY down into SE PA / C NJ. Also, we have a saturated CSI layer, per 12z NAM, during the first portion of the night when wair air advection and LLJ is present (mainly before 4z). The snow accumulations are going to be funny with north to south based maximums where these bands develop and drift southward.

not sure I understand this post...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...