Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,607
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    NH8550
    Newest Member
    NH8550
    Joined

Feb 8-9th Blizzard Thread


dryslot

Recommended Posts

RPM is bonkers. What a weenie model..lol.

Its been very consistent with the max QPF areas the past several runs unlike the NAM.  It just happened to throw in a weenie 40"+ bullseye over Billerica.  Its also not biting on the Boxing Day scenario like the NAM (Heavy QPF in NNJ/NYC).  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 2k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Save the image and attach.

 

Let me try again--and hope it loops.

 

But, unless the southern system can gain latitude and/or longitude, I think this visual shows how an early phase and SW stall is very much on the table.  It doesn't seem to be moving in either direction very much.  Am I off my rocker on this?  

 

No model assessment on my part here--just interpreting what I'm seeing.

post-462-0-89670100-1360293280_thumb.gif

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

It does.  The totals I don't think are as impressive as the NAM by any means (don't think there's a 5 spot anywhere in there etc).  This is the way I thought the NAM was going early in the run until it started the crazy left track. 

 

RGEM to me looks similar to the SREFs in terms of where the max snow would be.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It does.  The totals I don't think are as impressive as the NAM by any means (don't think there's a 5 spot anywhere in there etc).  This is the way I thought the NAM was going early in the run until it started the crazy left track. 

 

RGEM to me looks similar to the SREFs in terms of where the max snow would be.

 

yeah, NAM is whacky, but it's another piece of guidance.. but wow at that radar.. man this is going to dump on us no matter what.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Funny how the NAM is so diff from RGEM.

 

What do you and WIll make of it?

 

From a meteorological standpoint is there some backing to the idea that the low would spin up and run along the convection to the west?  Without it, that precip just isn't there.  RAP doesn't support it at all either, very similar to the RGEM.

 

RGEM actually...anyone have totals?

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What do you and WIll make of it?

 

From a meteorological standpoint is there some backing to the idea that the low would spin up and run along the convection to the west?  Without it, that precip just isn't there.  RAP doesn't support it at all either, very similar to the RGEM.

 

RGEM actually...anyone have totals?

 

 

 

The RGEM makes sense to me...I actually am a little surprised it's not a bit NW...but it seems to make sense.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm no expert but the NAM has always been my favorite model. It's sort of a "high stakes" gamble... it often has crazy ideas, and sometimes they are way off, but sometimes it just sees things the others don't. Still, it usually "treats me right". :)

 

Given my (admittedly subjective) impression of how often it seems that storms go west of forecast, I wouldn't be too surprised if the low hugged the coast a bit more than some of the other models say.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...