michsnowfreak Posted February 9, 2013 Share Posted February 9, 2013 12.2" imby. Oh, and it's much worse than that at Pearson. I go into the climo logs this morning and I see what Pearson recorded yesterday. Just 8.8". So that 10" total did include Thursday's snow. But get this, the snow that fell yesterday was on 0.91" liquid. In a storm that was mostly dry powder with some bursts o 20:1 type fluff snow during the heavier parts, Pearson recorded a sub 10:1 ratio . No other pcpn type fell so I know that's their SLR. Freaking incredible. Haven't had to shoot off an email to them since Feb 11th of last year but I think it's time. Other prelim reports from the City of Toronto proper: downtown: 11.0" EC HQ: 11.8" East York: 13.4" Thats ridiculous...it was clearly, 100% NOT a 9-1 ratio snow LOL. Hell, even here the snow was powdery as I had 2.7" snow and 0.31", of which Id have to estimate 0.10" was freezing rain...and you clearly had better ratios. Did you do a liquid equiv or no rain gauge? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
snowstormcanuck Posted February 9, 2013 Share Posted February 9, 2013 Have been sitting here trying to rank this storm but it's tough to do. So many pros and cons in comparison with the 2 other foot plus storms I've experienced (excluding Jan 1999 which is in a league of its own). One nice thing about this storm was that most of the accums. came in one shot in a relatively short period of time. The other two 12"+ storms (Feb 6, 2008 and Jan 26-27, 2004) were part A/B systems and occurred over the course of 24 and 36 hours respectively. But they themselves had excellent qualities (CG lightning, 2"/hr rates, intense lake bands, enormous flake size). None of those were present with this storm. I think I'm going to go with a 3 way tie behind Jan 1999. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
michsnowfreak Posted February 9, 2013 Share Posted February 9, 2013 Lol! 2 of my neighbors know I measure snow and send in the reports. The mail lady saw me measuring the overall depth in the front yard yesterday and commented! --- Nice snowfall map of Ontario, SSC. You should send that into EC and show them how ridiculous their "official" total at YYZ looks amongst the local area! My neighbors on the one side knows I measure for the NWS too lol. I sometimes feel weird, especially since we have had so many small snowfalls the last few weeks I keep going back and forth back and forth, but they will usually ask "how much did we get?". Now, I always wonder what the other neighbors think, I must look crazy with a 40" snowsaber in my hand For snow depth readings sometimes I will sneak across the street when the one neighbor isnt home, just to get a decent average Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
snowstormcanuck Posted February 9, 2013 Share Posted February 9, 2013 Thats ridiculous...it was clearly, 100% NOT a 9-1 ratio snow LOL. Hell, even here the snow was powdery as I had 2.7" snow and 0.31", of which Id have to estimate 0.10" was freezing rain...and you clearly had better ratios. Did you do a liquid equiv or no rain gauge? I don't have a calibrated dipstick so what I do is take a core sample, allow it to melt in my gauge, and then multiply the liquid content by 1.65. It's obviously not as accurate as using a dipstick, but it gives me an indication of the SLR and is usually consistent with the quality of the snow. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Geos Posted February 9, 2013 Share Posted February 9, 2013 Thanks so much everyone for sharing all the snow porn shots and all the great content in the storm threads. So thrilled for the Toronto Gang and hopefully they along with who else hasn't had a good event this winter has one knocking on their door soon this month. Few pics from around the yard from the cell phone on friday evening I'm embarrassed to put up after all the quality shot in this thread.. Almost forgot.. Congrats to Geos for keeping the faith and taking LOT to the woodshed!! Nice report and pictures BowMe. I like these two pictures the best! Chocolate labs are cool. Looks like you captured a hint of the sunset in the top photo. Never did see any color in the sky yesterday or the day of the storm. Lol, yeah I knew one of these storms had to work out. LOT was probably just going with the winter trend (can't really blame them), even though the models were pointing to at least 4" of snow in the area. I was really surprised that the RGEM was closest to the actual accumulations, haha. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Torontonian Posted February 9, 2013 Share Posted February 9, 2013 Have been sitting here trying to rank this storm but it's tough to do. So many pros and cons in comparison with the 2 other foot plus storms I've experienced (excluding Jan 1999 which is in a league of its own). One nice thing about this storm was that most of the accums. came in one shot in a relatively short period of time. The other two 12"+ storms (Feb 6, 2008 and Jan 26-27, 2004) were part A/B systems and occurred over the course of 24 and 36 hours respectively. But they themselves had excellent qualities (CG lightning, 2"/hr rates, intense lake bands, enormous flake size). None of those were present with this storm. I think I'm going to go with a 3 way tie behind Jan 1999. I would put this in Top 10 but wasn't as significant in downtown T.O as northwest and northeast of here. They say Aurora about 20 miles north received 40 cm. Here is photo after Feb. 6, 2008. Still have that van. lol Snowpiles are less than half that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
snowstormcanuck Posted February 9, 2013 Share Posted February 9, 2013 I would put this in Top 10 but wasn't as significant in downtown T.O as northwest and northeast of here. They say Aurora about 20 miles north received 40 cm. Here is photo after Feb. 6, 2008. IMG_0001-7.jpg Still have that van. lol Snowpiles are less than half that. That may be another con with this storm. The other two I mentioned didn't melt away in 3 days and actually reenforced existing snowpack, which made them seem even more impressive. At the very least though, the Feb 8, 2013 storm acted as a nice break in our seemingly never ending suffering over the last winter and a half. I think we all appreciate it. Maybe that can't be said for some of the other big storms that occurred during "big" winters. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
weathernut Posted February 9, 2013 Share Posted February 9, 2013 Regarding the snow totals at YYZ, I read an article on TWN website about how they measure snow in a different way than anywhere else. I think YHM does the same, hence the stupid totals from there. Us Hamilton folks always poke fun at YHM totals the way you guys do with YYZ. Both airports need to get with it IMO. EC was quoted in the Hamilton media today with official snow totals of over 35cm in West Hamilton and Mountain. They didn't even mention YHM, which leads me to believe they know it's way off. The West Mtn total of over 35cm is mere minutes from YHM. Cheers PS - if you haven't yet, get out for a LONG walk today through your neighbourhood. One of the most gorgeous winter days in years. EDIT: one more thing, does anyone know where to look online for a log of biggest storms in history for Canadian cities?? I'm curious to know how often Hamilton has received more than 35cm in 12 hours. Thx Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
snowstormcanuck Posted February 9, 2013 Share Posted February 9, 2013 Regarding the snow totals at YYZ, I read an article on TWN website about how they measure snow in a different way than anywhere else. I think YHM does the same, hence the stupid totals from there. Us Hamilton folks always poke fun at YHM totals the way you guys do with YYZ. Both airports need to get with it IMO. EC was quoted in the Hamilton media today with official snow totals of over 35cm in West Hamilton and Mountain. They didn't even mention YHM, which leads me to believe they know it's way off. The West Mtn total of over 35cm is mere minutes from YHM. Cheers PS - if you haven't yet, get out for a LONG walk today through your neighbourhood. One of the most gorgeous winter days in years. EDIT: one more thing, does anyone know where to look online for a log of biggest storms in history for Canadian cities?? I'm curious to know how often Hamilton has received more than 35cm in 12 hours. Thx Have a link? I'd be quite interested in reading that. I also noticed that Farnell on the telemovision yesterday said 30cm fell in Toronto, and in the Star this morning they reported 31cm. So the Pearson number has overall been ignored by the media. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BuffaloWeather Posted February 9, 2013 Share Posted February 9, 2013 Storm Reports out of WNY for this storm. Received 6 inches at my location. Niagara county got hit hard by this along with lake enhancement. 18 inches was max here in WNY. 38 inches was Max in the entire Northeast in Connecticut. NEW YORK...ALLEGANY COUNTY... 4 SW WEST ALMOND 4.9 900 AM 2/09 COCORAHS ALMA 4.0 700 AM 2/09 US COE ALFRED 2.8 700 AM 2/09 CO-OP OBSERVER RUSHFORD 2.2 630 AM 2/09 CO-OP OBSERVER WHITESVILLE 2.0 721 AM 2/09 CO-OP OBSERVER 1 S WELLSVILLE 1.0 600 AM 2/09 CO-OP OBSERVER...CATTARAUGUS COUNTY... PERRYSBURG 8.0 800 AM 2/09 CO-OP OBSERVER 5 N ALLEGANY 4.0 700 AM 2/09 COCORAHS WEST VALLEY 4.0 900 AM 2/09 FACEBOOK LITTLE VALLEY 4.0 700 AM 2/09 CO-OP OBSERVER CATTARAUGUS 4.0 700 AM 2/09 CO-OP OBSERVER FRANKLINVILLE 3.5 841 AM 2/09 TRAINED SPOTTER 1 NNE FRANKLINVILLE 3.5 830 AM 2/09 COCORAHS 1 ENE RANDOLPH 3.0 730 AM 2/09 COCORAHS 1 N LITTLE VALLEY 3.0 800 AM 2/09 COCORAHS 1 NE OLEAN 2.4 900 AM 2/09 COCORAHS SALAMANCA 2.0 800 AM 2/09 CO-OP OBSERVER 1 WSW OLEAN 1.0 730 AM 2/09 CO-OP OBSERVER...CAYUGA COUNTY... 8 SSE AUBURN 7.8 600 AM 2/09 COCORAHS...CHAUTAUQUA COUNTY... SINCLAIRVILLE 13.0 913 AM 2/09 BROADCAST MEDIA 2 SW FORESTVILLE 7.0 900 AM 2/09 COCORAHS FINDLEY LAKE 6.2 1033 AM 2/09 FACEBOOK 4 SSW RIPLEY 4.8 707 AM 2/09 COCORAHS JAMESTOWN 3.8 700 AM 2/09 CO-OP OBSERVER SILVER CREEK 3.0 917 AM 2/09 BROADCAST MEDIA...ERIE COUNTY... GRAND ISLAND 14.6 800 AM 2/09 FACEBOOK 1 N GRAND ISLAND 14.2 100 AM 2/09 FACEBOOK TONAWANDA 12.0 914 AM 2/09 BROADCAST MEDIA 3 NE TONAWANDA 10.5 830 AM 2/09 COCORAHS SWORMVILLE 10.3 848 AM 2/09 NWS EMPLOYEE 1 NW KENMORE 10.0 800 AM 2/09 COCORAHS ESE KENMORE 9.8 550 AM 2/09 COCORAHS 4 NW ALDEN 9.0 700 AM 2/09 COCORAHS 3 E WILLIAMSVILLE 8.9 700 AM 2/09 COCORAHS 1 NW WILLIAMSVILLE 8.5 700 AM 2/09 COCORAHS 2 S AKRON 8.0 800 AM 2/09 COCORAHS BUFFALO 8.0 700 AM 2/09 NWS OFFICE SPRINGVILLE 8.0 800 AM 2/09 CO-OP OBSERVER WEST FALLS 6.0 830 AM 2/09 FACEBOOK 1 N ORCHARD PARK 6.0 700 AM 2/09 COCORAHS 2 ENE COLDEN 6.0 800 AM 2/09 COCORAHS 2 NE BOSTON 6.0 730 AM 2/09 COCORAHS 2 SSW BLASDELL 6.0 700 AM 2/09 COCORAHS COLDEN 5.5 730 AM 2/09 CO-OP OBSERVER 3 WSW ELMA 5.5 700 AM 2/09 COCORAHS ENE EAST AURORA 5.5 700 AM 2/09 COCORAHS 2 W WEST SENECA 4.0 700 AM 2/09 COCORAHS 2 SE GLENWOOD 4.0 800 AM 2/09 COCORAHS WSW HAMBURG 4.0 700 AM 2/09 COCORAHS HAMBURG 3.0 919 AM 2/09 BROADCAST MEDIA 2 S WALES 3.0 700 AM 2/09 CO-OP OBSERVER...GENESEE COUNTY... OAKFIELD 11.0 830 AM 2/09 FACEBOOK 2 NE STAFFORD 8.0 700 AM 2/09 COCORAHS PAVILION 6.5 700 AM 2/09 CO-OP OBSERVER...JEFFERSON COUNTY... HENDERSON 15.0 1033 AM 2/09 FACEBOOK WEST CARTHAGE 13.0 1048 AM 2/09 FACEBOOK 3 S THERESA 7.5 800 AM 2/09 COCORAHS...LEWIS COUNTY... 1 NE LOWVILLE 12.1 700 AM 2/09 CO-OP OBSERVER 1 NW CONSTABLEVILLE 12.0 600 AM 2/09 COCORAHS SW BEAVER FALLS 11.0 700 AM 2/09 COCORAHS HIGHMARKET 9.7 351 AM 2/09 CO-OP OBSERVER WATSON 9.5 745 AM 2/09 FACEBOOK NORTH OSCEOLA 8.0 1125 AM 2/09 FACEBOOK...LIVINGSTON COUNTY... 4 WSW DANSVILLE 5.0 600 AM 2/09 COCORAHS 1 ENE DANSVILLE 4.2 800 AM 2/09 COCORAHS 2 W MOUNT MORRIS 4.0 810 AM 2/09 CO-OP OBSERVER AVON 3.8 700 AM 2/09 CO-OP OBSERVER CONESUS 2.0 515 AM 2/09 TRAINED SPOTTER...MONROE COUNTY... IRONDEQUOIT 16.0 1124 AM 2/09 FACEBOOK 1 W GREECE 15.5 1125 AM 2/09 TRAINED SPOTTER SPENCERPORT 15.0 1033 AM 2/09 FACEBOOK CHILI CENTER 14.0 1124 AM 2/09 FACEBOOK 2 SW OGDEN CENTER 14.0 1032 AM 2/09 FACEBOOK 5 WNW ROCHESTER 13.1 700 AM 2/09 COCORAHS ROCHESTER INTL ARPT 12.4 700 AM 2/09 ASOS 6 ESE ROCHESTER 12.0 800 AM 2/09 COCORAHS PENFIELD 12.0 1036 AM 2/09 FACEBOOK WEBSTER 7.7 1201 AM 2/09 COCORAHS 4 N HONEOYE FALLS 7.5 1031 AM 2/09 FACEBOOK 1 NW NORTH CHILI 7.5 830 AM 2/09 COCORAHS...NIAGARA COUNTY... GASPORT 18.0 1123 AM 2/09 FACEBOOK LOCKPORT 17.0 830 AM 2/09 FACEBOOK SANBORN 16.0 915 AM 2/09 BROADCAST MEDIA 2 S LOCKPORT 16.0 1103 AM 2/09 TRAINED SPOTTER RANSOMVILLE 16.0 911 AM 2/09 BROADCAST MEDIA 1 NE LOCKPORT 15.5 700 AM 2/09 COCORAHS YOUNGSTOWN 14.4 800 AM 2/09 CO-OP OBSERVER LEWISTON 14.0 912 AM 2/09 BROADCAST MEDIA PENDLETON 14.0 914 AM 2/09 BROADCAST MEDIA CAMBRIA 13.0 913 AM 2/09 BROADCAST MEDIA NIAGARA FALLS 13.0 917 AM 2/09 BROADCAST MEDIA 3 ENE LOCKPORT 12.1 700 AM 2/09 COCORAHS 1 NNE NORTH TONAWANDA 11.7 800 AM 2/09 COCORAHS 2 NE NORTH TONAWANDA 11.6 830 AM 2/09 COCORAHS NIAGARA FALLS AIRPORT 10.8 700 AM 2/09 CO-OP OBSERVER NORTH TONAWANDA 10.8 1241 PM 2/09 CO-OP OBSERVER 1 NE PENDLETON 9.6 700 AM 2/09 COCORAHS 2 NE PENDLETON 9.5 1031 AM 2/09 FACEBOOK...ONTARIO COUNTY... GENEVA 8.0 800 AM 2/09 CO-OP OBSERVER BRISTOL 5.5 1030 AM 2/09 FACEBOOK...ORLEANS COUNTY... HOLLEY 14.0 825 AM 2/09 PUBLIC LYNDONVILLE 9.5 900 AM 2/09 CO-OP OBSERVER...OSWEGO COUNTY... W FULTON 9.5 720 AM 2/09 COCORAHS REDFIELD 7.0 427 AM 2/09 FACEBOOK SE MINETTO 6.8 800 AM 2/09 COCORAHS SOUTH HANNIBAL 6.8 830 AM 2/09 FACEBOOK 4 SSE LACONA 6.3 700 AM 2/09 COCORAHS 2 SSE PALERMO 5.7 600 AM 2/09 CO-OP OBSERVER SANDY CREEK 5.2 700 AM 2/09 CO-OP OBSERVER 4 SSW MEXICO 5.1 900 AM 2/09 COCORAHS 1 WNW OSWEGO 3.8 700 AM 2/09 COCORAHS...WAYNE COUNTY... NEWARK 13.5 841 AM 2/09 FACEBOOK MARION 13.0 900 AM 2/09 FACEBOOK 2 SW WALWORTH 12.5 700 AM 2/09 COCORAHS 2 NW PALMYRA 11.9 830 AM 2/09 COCORAHS 1 W WALWORTH 11.5 1035 AM 2/09 BROADCAST MEDIA...WYOMING COUNTY... WARSAW 9.0 809 AM 2/09 TRAINED SPOTTER 6 SW WARSAW 6.5 730 AM 2/09 CO-OP OBSERVER 3 N SILVER SPRINGS 3.0 700 AM 2/09 CO-OP OBSERVER PORTAGEVILLE 1.0 825 AM 2/09 TRAINED SPOTTER Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TugHillMatt Posted February 9, 2013 Share Posted February 9, 2013 Here are a couple pictures from after the storm around my home and at the amazing Lake Michigan just a couple minutes away. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TugHillMatt Posted February 9, 2013 Share Posted February 9, 2013 A few more... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TugHillMatt Posted February 9, 2013 Share Posted February 9, 2013 I'll post more on the "Pictures Thread" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OntarioWX Posted February 9, 2013 Share Posted February 9, 2013 Ranking this storm is a little tough for me since I lived the first 18 years of my life in far southwestern ON and only moved to Hamilton last September. Up until this year, every snowstorm I've experienced has been down there. That being said, I still think this ranks in or close to my Top 5. Mostly because of how much snow fell, but also because it has saved an otherwise awful winter for me. My number 1 is December 2004, easily, for so many reasons. I've also got Jan. 2005, April 2005, March 2008 and GHD 2011 on there. I know Jan. 1999 was a big hit for my area as well but I don't think it really counts considering I was five years old at the time. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
on_wx Posted February 9, 2013 Share Posted February 9, 2013 Have a link? I'd be quite interested in reading that. I also noticed that Farnell on the telemovision yesterday said 30cm fell in Toronto, and in the Star this morning they reported 31cm. So the Pearson number has overall been ignored by the media. Here you are, Mike. "In Ontario, we often reference the totals at Toronto Pearson International Airport, which can be dramatically different from the snowfall seen in nearby cities. That's because the airport uses a Nipher gauge -- a bell-shaped device that captures the falling snow. Often, the wind will blow a lot of snow out of the guage. When the contents of the gauge are melted down and converted into a snowfall total, it's often less than what you are seeing at home." http://www.theweathernetwork.com/news/storm_watch_stories3&stormfile=How_are_snowfall_totals_measured__08_02_2013 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chicago Storm Posted February 9, 2013 Share Posted February 9, 2013 Here you are, Mike. "In Ontario, we often reference the totals at Toronto Pearson International Airport, which can be dramatically different from the snowfall seen in nearby cities. That's because the airport uses a Nipher gauge -- a bell-shaped device that captures the falling snow. Often, the wind will blow a lot of snow out of the guage. When the contents of the gauge are melted down and converted into a snowfall total, it's often less than what you are seeing at home." http://www.theweathernetwork.com/news/storm_watch_stories3&stormfile=How_are_snowfall_totals_measured__08_02_2013 That might be one of the most idiotic things ever. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dmc76 Posted February 9, 2013 Share Posted February 9, 2013 Here you are, Mike. "In Ontario, we often reference the totals at Toronto Pearson International Airport, which can be dramatically different from the snowfall seen in nearby cities. That's because the airport uses a Nipher gauge -- a bell-shaped device that captures the falling snow. Often, the wind will blow a lot of snow out of the guage. When the contents of the gauge are melted down and converted into a snowfall total, it's often less than what you are seeing at home." http://www.theweathernetwork.com/news/storm_watch_stories3&stormfile=How_are_snowfall_totals_measured__08_02_2013 I'm speechless. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
snowstormcanuck Posted February 9, 2013 Share Posted February 9, 2013 Here you are, Mike. "In Ontario, we often reference the totals at Toronto Pearson International Airport, which can be dramatically different from the snowfall seen in nearby cities. That's because the airport uses a Nipher gauge -- a bell-shaped device that captures the falling snow. Often, the wind will blow a lot of snow out of the guage. When the contents of the gauge are melted down and converted into a snowfall total, it's often less than what you are seeing at home." http://www.theweathernetwork.com/news/storm_watch_stories3&stormfile=How_are_snowfall_totals_measured__08_02_2013 After years of wondering, the mystery has been solved. I can't believe EC would allow an inaccurate method of measuring snow to be used at one of its, apparently WMO certified, "official" reporting locations. lol, 68.1% catch frequency. Close enough. http://journals.ametsoc.org/doi/pdf/10.1175/JHM542.1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ottawa Blizzard Posted February 10, 2013 Share Posted February 10, 2013 After years of wondering, the mystery has been solved. I can't believe EC would allow an inaccurate method of measuring snow to be used at one of its, apparently WMO certified, "official" reporting locations. lol, 68.1% catch frequency. Close enough. http://journals.ametsoc.org/doi/pdf/10.1175/JHM542.1 This. I mean, now that they know there's a problem, why not fix it? Wouldn't that be common sense? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ottawa Blizzard Posted February 10, 2013 Share Posted February 10, 2013 Here you are, Mike. "In Ontario, we often reference the totals at Toronto Pearson International Airport, which can be dramatically different from the snowfall seen in nearby cities. That's because the airport uses a Nipher gauge -- a bell-shaped device that captures the falling snow. Often, the wind will blow a lot of snow out of the guage. When the contents of the gauge are melted down and converted into a snowfall total, it's often less than what you are seeing at home." http://www.theweathernetwork.com/news/storm_watch_stories3&stormfile=How_are_snowfall_totals_measured__08_02_2013 Chris Scott did a presentation on this on The Weather Network this afternoon. I only caught the end of it though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
snowstormcanuck Posted February 10, 2013 Share Posted February 10, 2013 This. I mean, now that they know there's a problem, why not fix it? Wouldn't that be common sense? I'm sure they're aware of the deficiencies of the nipher gauge. It probably has something to do with cost efficiency and not having to pay an individual to go out an measure the snow with a ruler. I believe Pearson is AWOS. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stebo Posted February 10, 2013 Share Posted February 10, 2013 Here you are, Mike. "In Ontario, we often reference the totals at Toronto Pearson International Airport, which can be dramatically different from the snowfall seen in nearby cities. That's because the airport uses a Nipher gauge -- a bell-shaped device that captures the falling snow. Often, the wind will blow a lot of snow out of the guage. When the contents of the gauge are melted down and converted into a snowfall total, it's often less than what you are seeing at home." http://www.theweathernetwork.com/news/storm_watch_stories3&stormfile=How_are_snowfall_totals_measured__08_02_2013 Honestly how can they use such a terrible inaccurate system for snow. I am shocked. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ottawa Blizzard Posted February 10, 2013 Share Posted February 10, 2013 All of this goes to show that Pearson doesn't "measure up" to our standards. Honestly EC should invest money in getting accurate measurements. Buttonville is the airport I rely on most. Downsview is good for central Toronto/North York. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
weathernut Posted February 10, 2013 Share Posted February 10, 2013 Here you are, Mike. "In Ontario, we often reference the totals at Toronto Pearson International Airport, which can be dramatically different from the snowfall seen in nearby cities. That's because the airport uses a Nipher gauge -- a bell-shaped device that captures the falling snow. Often, the wind will blow a lot of snow out of the guage. When the contents of the gauge are melted down and converted into a snowfall total, it's often less than what you are seeing at home." http://www.theweathernetwork.com/news/storm_watch_stories3&stormfile=How_are_snowfall_totals_measured__08_02_2013 Just getting back home and reading this now. Thx for posting the link...that's the one. Totally stupid IMO. Canada's biggest airport measuring like that?? Crazy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OntarioWX Posted February 10, 2013 Share Posted February 10, 2013 All of this goes to show that Pearson doesn't "measure up" to our standards. Honestly EC should invest money in getting accurate measurements. Buttonville is the airport I rely on most. Downsview is good for central Toronto/North York. To be fair, Environment Canada isn't really in a position to invest much money in anything right now. They've been enduring some big budget cuts and have lost a lot of staff in the past couple of years. EC is a big organization that does a lot more than forecast weather - they're also responsible for Canada's environmental policies and renewable resource programs. It's hard to say if the budget cuts have anything to do with their poor quality control lately but I wouldn't be surprised. As for Pearson, it's pretty easy to see why they'd go with an automated station, although you wouldn't think paying somebody to go outside and stick a ruler in the snow would cost all that much money, either. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stebo Posted February 10, 2013 Share Posted February 10, 2013 To be fair, Environment Canada isn't really in a position to invest much money in anything right now. They've been enduring some big budget cuts and have lost a lot of staff in the past couple of years. EC is a big organization that does a lot more than forecast weather - they're also responsible for Canada's environmental policies and renewable resource programs. It's hard to say if the budget cuts have anything to do with their poor quality control lately but I wouldn't be surprised. As for Pearson, it's pretty easy to see why they'd go with an automated station, although you wouldn't think paying somebody to go outside and stick a ruler in the snow would cost all that much money, either. There are plenty of reasons why the largest airport in Canada shouldn't be auto. During mixed precip events or thunderstorm events would be two key reasons. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Toronto4 Posted February 10, 2013 Share Posted February 10, 2013 Just checked Environrment Canada's climate database and two stations in the City of Toronto recorded over a foot of snow. Downtown got 14.4" (36.5 cm) and East York recorded 12.9" (32.8 cm). Here's a photo that I took yesterday. This is at Queens Park, very close to the downtown station at the University of Toronto. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
snowstormcanuck Posted February 10, 2013 Share Posted February 10, 2013 Just checked Environrment Canada's climate database and two stations in the City of Toronto recorded over a foot of snow. Downtown got 14.4" (36.5 cm) and East York recorded 12.9" (32.8 cm). Here's a photo that I took yesterday. This is at Queens Park, very close to the downtown station at the University of Toronto. IMG-20130209-00248 (600x800).jpg Just saw that 14.4" for downtown. New they had over a foot but I didn't think it'd be that high. That surpasses the Feb 26-27, 1984 storm by 0.1". Tied for 22nd all time, but 4th since WWII only behind December 11-12, 1944 (22.5"), January 22-23, 1966 (16.6"), and January 2-3, 1999. (15.1"). Once EC HQ numbers are finalized I think they'll also be over a foot. Only nipher Pearson will not be invited to the party. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Toronto4 Posted February 10, 2013 Share Posted February 10, 2013 Just saw that 14.4" for downtown. New they had over a foot but I didn't think it'd be that high. That surpasses the Feb 26-27, 1984 storm by 0.1". Tied for 22nd all time, but 4th since WWII only behind December 11-12, 1944 (22.5"), January 22-23, 1966 (16.6"), and January 2-3, 1999. (15.1"). Once EC HQ numbers are finalized I think they'll also be over a foot. Only nipher Pearson will not be invited to the party. Looking at some of the cleanup footage on the news, the foot plus totals are more accurate than Pearson's total. Some neighbourhoods in the city (midtown, Leslieville) have side streets with super high snow banks. Also, some cars are trapped because people are shovelling snow onto the side streets. Cleanup is expected to finish up by the end of the day today. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ottawa Blizzard Posted February 10, 2013 Share Posted February 10, 2013 Just checked Environrment Canada's climate database and two stations in the City of Toronto recorded over a foot of snow. Downtown got 14.4" (36.5 cm) and East York recorded 12.9" (32.8 cm). Here's a photo that I took yesterday. This is at Queens Park, very close to the downtown station at the University of Toronto. IMG-20130209-00248 (600x800).jpg Where are the downtown readings taken? Is it still on Bloor Street by U of T? I know there's a plaque there saying that's where the Meteorological Service of Canada used to be located. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.