wxeyeNH Posted February 7, 2013 Share Posted February 7, 2013 Wow best post I have ever read on these boards and coming from Tip a real life threatening situation for people like the Boston homeless Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
charleskoz Posted February 7, 2013 Share Posted February 7, 2013 Well, the NAM looks good for those of us in western New England. But we've not had a really good storm verify in forever, so I'm sure the storm will stay east. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
moneypitmike Posted February 7, 2013 Share Posted February 7, 2013 I expect after rest of suite comes in every single outlet will have 2-3 feet. You are going to be forced to based upon what us being printed out After the rest of the suite comes in, every member of the board will be able to say that while they may not be the jackpot, they'll be pummelled. The NAM took care of that for the NYC crowd. Now we just need one to hit PF. When all is said and done though, it'll be most fun inside of 495. Didn't Bloomberg also say that Sandy wouldn't be as bad as Irene? Bloomberg just made a press confrence in the city and said 4-6" for NYC, not sure where he is getting that, I think pretty much every model at this point is 8"+ for NYC? Suprised, since he should be commincating with Upton which is calling for much more. -skisheep Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
radarman Posted February 7, 2013 Share Posted February 7, 2013 Well, the NAM looks good for those of us in western New England. But we've not had a really good storm verify in forever, so I'm sure the storm will stay east. Not sure where you're at but October 2011 isn't exactly forever. Nor January 2011 if you missed the Octobomb Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
phil882 Posted February 7, 2013 Share Posted February 7, 2013 What did the Euro ensembles show last night? Bit east of the op? I think they were actually a slight bit west of the operational run. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
needbiggerboat Posted February 7, 2013 Share Posted February 7, 2013 I think before the 2/6/10 storm in BWI/DC the NAM and GFS were both showing 30 inch amounts 24-36 hours out, in that case it turned out more or less correct. Bufkits prior to 12/19/09 were spitting out obscene 40+ amounts, and we ended up with 18 at IAD...We learned to take these scenarios in stride in that routine winter of 09/10. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Baroclinic Zone Posted February 7, 2013 Share Posted February 7, 2013 GEFS are in. Pretty sizable bump W with QPF. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
moneypitmike Posted February 7, 2013 Share Posted February 7, 2013 Well, the NAM looks good for those of us in western New England. But we've not had a really good storm verify in forever, so I'm sure the storm will stay east. Yeah--that was our model, ftl. Regardless, even if we get skunked, it would still be considerred a good storm on any other measure. Where in western NE are you? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
charleskoz Posted February 7, 2013 Share Posted February 7, 2013 Yeah--that was our model, ftl. Regardless, even if we get skunked, it would still be considerred a good storm on any other measure. Where in western NE are you? It's just been a looooooooooooooong time since we had a real storm here. I can't even remember the last time we got over a foot. I'm in Bennington (which is kinda the snow hole of Vermont anyway, but none of southern VT has had much in a long time.) The NAM has always been my favorite model, and it's holding pretty firm on the west track, while the GFS edged a bit west. I think the 18z runs will show some convergence... at least I hope so! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
N. OF PIKE Posted February 7, 2013 Share Posted February 7, 2013 Pretty sizable bump W with QPF. bob can you post page that fits on screen wrt 12z gefs qpf, i can't get them off raliegh site rignt now, not sure why Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ginx snewx Posted February 7, 2013 Share Posted February 7, 2013 Ok just a few things for those who did not live in 78. Severe Tstorms, gravity waves and house size drifts. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Clinch Leatherwood Posted February 7, 2013 Share Posted February 7, 2013 I missed WCVB, but here's the lead at noon of the other two Boston stations. Buying heavy into the Cape Cod hose job. I figure 8-9" here plus or minus 2" roughly speaking is a safe bet pending later runs. NAM is worrying. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
N. OF PIKE Posted February 7, 2013 Share Posted February 7, 2013 It's just been a looooooooooooooong time since we had a real storm here. I can't even remember the last time we got over a foot. I'm in Bennington (which is kinda the snow hole of Vermont anyway, but none of southern VT has had much in a long time.) The NAM has always been my favorite model, and it's holding pretty firm on the west track, while the GFS edged a bit west. I think the 18z runs will show some convergence... at least I hope so! get a hotel in woodford for this if it hugs central NJ coast. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Damage In Tolland Posted February 7, 2013 Share Posted February 7, 2013 Severe t storms? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EasternUSWX Posted February 7, 2013 Share Posted February 7, 2013 Let it snow Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
charleskoz Posted February 7, 2013 Share Posted February 7, 2013 get a hotel in woodford for this if it hugs central NJ coast. I lived at 2300 feet in Somerset, VT for 7 winters. I know the drill. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SlantStickers Anonymous Posted February 7, 2013 Share Posted February 7, 2013 I missed WCVB, but here's the lead at noon of the other two Boston stations. Buying heavy into the Cape Cod hose job. I figure 8-9" here plus or minus 2" roughly speaking is a safe bet pending later runs. NAM is worrying. Wcvb had 16-24+ much of sne, I missed what it showed on the cape though Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SR Airglow Posted February 7, 2013 Share Posted February 7, 2013 After the rest of the suite comes in, every member of the board will be able to say that while they may not be the jackpot, they'll be pummelled. The NAM took care of that for the NYC crowd. Now we just need one to hit PF. When all is said and done though, it'll be most fun inside of 495. Didn't Bloomberg also say that Sandy wouldn't be as bad as Irene? Yup he dosen't have the greatest track record when it comes to extreme weather. -skisheep Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Baroclinic Zone Posted February 7, 2013 Share Posted February 7, 2013 bob can you post page that fits on screen wrt 12z gefs qpf, i can't get them off raliegh site rignt now, not sure why Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ginx snewx Posted February 7, 2013 Share Posted February 7, 2013 Severe t storms? winds over 55 with lightning and thunder with copious precip.Yep Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
radarman Posted February 7, 2013 Share Posted February 7, 2013 It's just been a looooooooooooooong time since we had a real storm here. I can't even remember the last time we got over a foot. I'm in Bennington (which is kinda the snow hole of Vermont anyway, but none of southern VT has had much in a long time.) 2/27/10? Hope you break your slump though. NAM, while almost certainly too bullish on QPF (what else is new?) is definitely the winner for us. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dryslot Posted February 7, 2013 Author Share Posted February 7, 2013 These news outlets posting these high end insane totals just love to place a gun to there head time after time Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
N. OF PIKE Posted February 7, 2013 Share Posted February 7, 2013 thank u kind sir. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ginx snewx Posted February 7, 2013 Share Posted February 7, 2013 In 78 the highest I remember forecast was 12-24. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kevin W Posted February 7, 2013 Share Posted February 7, 2013 Severe t storms? That was a bit of a stretch. As I remember it, there was thundersnow but not severe. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Clinch Leatherwood Posted February 7, 2013 Share Posted February 7, 2013 Schools closed Friday in Boston. I think most everywhere will follow suit. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
N. OF PIKE Posted February 7, 2013 Share Posted February 7, 2013 These news outlets posting these high end insane totals just love to place a gun to there head time after time in the heat of the moment, most of public forgets about past busts, and will tune in if extreme wx is forecast, they graviate toward extreme solutions Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dryslot Posted February 7, 2013 Author Share Posted February 7, 2013 in the heat of the moment, most of public forgets about past busts, and will tune in if extreme wx is forecast, they graviate toward extreme solutions But going all in before we even have the storm developed just leaves no room to move in a direction Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SnowMan Posted February 7, 2013 Share Posted February 7, 2013 Schools closed Friday in Boston. I think most everywhere will follow suit. Wait...Tolland didnt cancel first? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RI Rob Posted February 7, 2013 Share Posted February 7, 2013 Ahhh, I hope I dont regret staying in Boston instead of going home. Either way, im going 18-27 in bos.. hopefully not too aggrsive. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.