aldie 22 Posted February 6, 2013 Share Posted February 6, 2013 Still do. Then post in the mid range thread...you're too bi polar Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TUweathermanDD Posted February 6, 2013 Share Posted February 6, 2013 I don't really see the S stream disturbance is going to get much precip here Winterwxluvr, what you just posted is what I mean. The precip from that isn't going to do much for us IMO. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
yoda Posted February 6, 2013 Share Posted February 6, 2013 NAM looks pretty Euroish Nah, headed out to sea at 78... but will dump good QPF of prob an inch in SNE Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wonderdog Posted February 6, 2013 Share Posted February 6, 2013 That's a nice lp at Hatteras at hr. 66. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TUweathermanDD Posted February 6, 2013 Share Posted February 6, 2013 Nah, headed out to sea at 78... but will dump good QPF of prob an inch maybe in SNE Yea an inch, and its not even associated with the coastal. Wow if that thing phases... boom Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
yoda Posted February 6, 2013 Share Posted February 6, 2013 Then post in the mid range thread...you're too bi polar Wonder if he got that 1-2" last night... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TUweathermanDD Posted February 6, 2013 Share Posted February 6, 2013 Wonder if he got that 1-2" last night... You did...dave told me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BristowWx Posted February 6, 2013 Share Posted February 6, 2013 That's a nice lp at Hatteras at hr. 66. Why is it not pulling down more cold? Not strong enough. The position of the lp is classic...the high is strong and cold...only this year is that set up not money Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wonderdog Posted February 6, 2013 Share Posted February 6, 2013 NAM seems to be coming around and it's still out of its comfort zone. A good improvement over 18z. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WinterWxLuvr Posted February 6, 2013 Share Posted February 6, 2013 Someone straighten me out on this. If that ns shortwave digs deeper and a bit further west doesn't it force the se low further west and on a more northerly traj? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mitchnick Posted February 6, 2013 Share Posted February 6, 2013 Why is it not pulling down more cold? Not strong enough. The position of the lp is classic...the high is strong and cold...only this year is that set up not money upper level is fooked up thanks to the n stream vort over the Great Lakes....common problem in NINA and NINA-type years Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WEATHER53 Posted February 6, 2013 Share Posted February 6, 2013 heh, the runs are getting colder not warmer soooooo... Picking up on the high exerting more influence which is the theme of my discussions. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ravensrule Posted February 6, 2013 Share Posted February 6, 2013 Picking up on the high exerting more influence which is the theme of my discussions. If this does happen I hope you bump troll the hell out of Ji. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WinterWxLuvr Posted February 6, 2013 Share Posted February 6, 2013 If this does happen I hope you bump troll the hell out of Ji. Oh, he wouldn't be the only one. I'm praying for this one for no other reason than massive trolling. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
usedtobe Posted February 6, 2013 Share Posted February 6, 2013 NAM seems to be coming around and it's still out of its comfort zone. A good improvement over 18z. At 60rs the temp at 950 mb at dca is 4.5 C. Still pretty doggone warm. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WinterWxLuvr Posted February 6, 2013 Share Posted February 6, 2013 At 60rs the temp at 950 mb at dca is 4.5 C. Still pretty doggone warm. That's pretty toasty Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
usedtobe Posted February 6, 2013 Share Posted February 6, 2013 Picking up on the high exerting more influence which is the theme of my discussions. Why would that high have much influence when there is a low to the north of our low directly between that high and our low. Seems like it would cut off the cold air to me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TUweathermanDD Posted February 6, 2013 Share Posted February 6, 2013 Why would that high have much influence when there is a low to the north of our low directly between that high and our low. Seems like it would cut off the cold air to me. The gl piece doesn't really allow to hp to exhort its influence irt cold air. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ravensrule Posted February 6, 2013 Share Posted February 6, 2013 Why would that high have much influence when there is a low to the north of our low directly between that high and our low. Seems like it would cut off the cold air to me. You ask WAY to many good questions. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TUweathermanDD Posted February 6, 2013 Share Posted February 6, 2013 You ask WAY to many good questions. Yes, all his ?'s are actually rhetorical as he could smoke any met pretty much. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CAPE Posted February 6, 2013 Share Posted February 6, 2013 Why would that high have much influence when there is a low to the north of our low directly between that high and our low. Seems like it would cut off the cold air to me. Thats what I would think, but what do I know lol. Having that low to the NW kills it for us thermally, and that High cant do much as its placement and strength are not ideal for down here. Without a 50-50 and or a block, this setup just isnt likely going to produce anything good here. Of course the models could always be wrong about that midwest low I suppose. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WEATHER53 Posted February 6, 2013 Share Posted February 6, 2013 Why would that high have much influence when there is a low to the north of our low directly between that high and our low. Seems like it would cut off the cold air to me. Do need to have that northwestern low be of little influence I agree but having a 1035+ high being near the right place at near the right time at least allows for some potential. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stormtracker Posted February 6, 2013 Share Posted February 6, 2013 Why would that high have much influence when there is a low to the north of our low directly between that high and our low. Seems like it would cut off the cold air to me. Keep it real Wes. If things look good, I'd say things look great. It's not pessimism to state facts. It is what it is. I hope to God Winterwxluvr can bump troll me and I'm wrong, I honestly mean that...but I'm punting. Next week looks better. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TUweathermanDD Posted February 6, 2013 Share Posted February 6, 2013 Keep it real Wes. If things look good, I'd say things look great. It's not pessimism to state facts. It is what it is. I hope to God Winterwxluvr can bump troll me and I'm wrong, I honestly mean that...but I'm punting. Next week looks better. Agreed, these people should know when to punt when I've already punted. Dear God. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stormtracker Posted February 6, 2013 Share Posted February 6, 2013 That being said, GFS is excruciatingly close. That pesky NW low. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stormtracker Posted February 6, 2013 Share Posted February 6, 2013 Looks like the GFS might be warm for folks up north...at least BOS I mean. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TUweathermanDD Posted February 6, 2013 Share Posted February 6, 2013 Looks like the GFS might be warm for folks up north...at least BOS I mean. Is the gfs really that close? I guess sorta, but the low isn't gonna disappear. Digging aside and phase, it would first be good to weaken the primary faster. Looks like some quick snow here. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
yoda Posted February 6, 2013 Share Posted February 6, 2013 Looks like the GFS might be warm for folks up north...at least BOS I mean. Looks like all snow Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stormtracker Posted February 6, 2013 Share Posted February 6, 2013 Looks like BOS is close, but just makes it. Was right about the coastal areas though. Still, they're in a hell of a lot better position than we are. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ian Posted February 6, 2013 Share Posted February 6, 2013 Keep it real Wes. If things look good, I'd say things look great. It's not pessimism to state facts. It is what it is. I hope to God Winterwxluvr can bump troll me and I'm wrong, I honestly mean that...but I'm punting. Next week looks better.plenty of time to write off next week. i mean that one run of the euro is probably right. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.