Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,611
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    NH8550
    Newest Member
    NH8550
    Joined

PUNTING NEMO


Ji

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 1.5k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

How's this thing looking for the green mountains in vermont? Might consider a trip up to stratton or killington.

They seem to get a nice bit from the primary and an inverted trough type thing combined with upslope. Consensus seems a nice 12" storm for Vermont. Maybe more is the winds hit the mtns just right.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't remember any cases of a 2 ft snow forecasted to go north of us shifting south and nailing us ever. Minor adjustments sure. Getting an inch unexpected sure. Having a major shift like this no. But there is always a first.

We have had major storms downgraded. But I wasn't referring to MA getting anything in this instance. Rather thinking of us getting painfully shafted at times. Yeah. A shift here on this this one may get someone some flakes. Not counting on it though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

SREFS are colder and wetter to some degree across most of the area.

I looked again to be sure, and the srefs are definitely wetter and somewhat colder at 850 and the surface. That's all I can see.

These things have to have some use, right?

Can't see individuals, so I don't know yet how them mean is getting where it is.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I will take realistic optimists over the other 2 any day.

Thanks for the kind words, and congrats to your Ravens.

Truth be told, I'm usually foolishly optimistic. However, I do tend to really like wet systems with cad involved. Trouble is this time it seems we need more wet and more cad. If we could just get that northern low to back off, maybe give those ne winds a chance to slide in.

I am intrigued by the srefs. Damn PSU site is holding back the ind members though so I don't know what to make of it.

As Ian said, we all have our roles. I'm probably just playing my usual (see above). :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks for the kind words, and congrats to your Ravens.

Truth be told, I'm usually foolishly optimistic. However, I do tend to really like wet systems with cad involved. Trouble is this time it seems we need more wet and more cad. If we could just get that northern low to back off, maybe give those ne winds a chance to slide in.

I am intrigued by the srefs. Damn PSU site is holding back the ind members though so I don't know what to make of it.

As Ian said, we all have our roles. I'm probably just playing my usual (see above). :)

Usually I love your optimism, and can frequently share it with you! Just I don't see this one with the primary, its a big time nono to stop the flow of cold air. I don't like these set-ups one bit. Eliminate that low and it'd be a KU up and down the coast, but we unfortunately can't. Miller B screwage, and lakes low warm air surge. The transfer eliminates our chance at real QPF.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks for the kind words, and congrats to your Ravens.

Truth be told, I'm usually foolishly optimistic. However, I do tend to really like wet systems with cad involved. Trouble is this time it seems we need more wet and more cad. If we could just get that northern low to back off, maybe give those ne winds a chance to slide in.

I am intrigued by the srefs. Damn PSU site is holding back the ind members though so I don't know what to make of it.

As Ian said, we all have our roles. I'm probably just playing my usual (see above). :)

 

It is like a 4th and 29 down here but hell the Ravens did it and we won the Super Bowl so anything is possible :snowing: .

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...