Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,588
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    LopezElliana
    Newest Member
    LopezElliana
    Joined

February 2-3 Potential Super Bowl Storm Discussion


Mitchel Volk

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 553
  • Created
  • Last Reply

The convective parameters look great especially the further east that you go.

 

 

Sounding variables and indices1000-500 mb thick:      5243.79 mFreezing level:          976.83 mb =   170.85 m =   560.51 ftWetbulb zero:            986.89 mb =    86.84 m =   284.90 ftPrecipitable water:        0.40 inchesSfc-500 mean rel hum:     93.05 %Est. max temperature:      5.69 C =   42.24 FSfc-Lift cond lev (LCL): 971.50 mb =   212.45 m =   697.01 ft T:   -0.30 C700-500 lapse rate:        7.08 C/kmThetaE index:              0.03 C Layer  950.0- 900.0 mbConv cond level (CCL):   916.41 mb =   677.03 m =  2221.20 ft  Mean mixing ratio:       3.32 g/kg  Conv temperature:        3.36 C =   38.05 FCap Strength:              6.71 CLifted Index:              7.56 C Risk: NoneLifted Index @300 mb:     21.14 CLifted Index @700 mb:      3.99 CShowalter Index:           6.62 C Risk: NoneTotal Totals Index:       50.67 C Risk: Scattered heavy thunderstorms  Vertical Totals Index:  25.58 C  Cross Totals Index:     25.08 CK Index:                  17.57   Risk: < 20 % chance of thunderstormsSweat Index:             110.40   Risk: NoneEnergy Index:              1.77   Risk: None
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The convective parameters look great especially the further east that you go.

 

 

Sounding variables and indices1000-500 mb thick:      5243.79 mFreezing level:          976.83 mb =   170.85 m =   560.51 ftWetbulb zero:            986.89 mb =    86.84 m =   284.90 ftPrecipitable water:        0.40 inchesSfc-500 mean rel hum:     93.05 %Est. max temperature:      5.69 C =   42.24 FSfc-Lift cond lev (LCL): 971.50 mb =   212.45 m =   697.01 ft T:   -0.30 C700-500 lapse rate:        7.08 C/kmThetaE index:              0.03 C Layer  950.0- 900.0 mbConv cond level (CCL):   916.41 mb =   677.03 m =  2221.20 ft  Mean mixing ratio:       3.32 g/kg  Conv temperature:        3.36 C =   38.05 FCap Strength:              6.71 CLifted Index:              7.56 C Risk: NoneLifted Index @300 mb:     21.14 CLifted Index @700 mb:      3.99 CShowalter Index:           6.62 C Risk: NoneTotal Totals Index:       50.67 C Risk: Scattered heavy thunderstorms  Vertical Totals Index:  25.58 C  Cross Totals Index:     25.08 CK Index:                  17.57   Risk: < 20 % chance of thunderstormsSweat Index:             110.40   Risk: NoneEnergy Index:              1.77   Risk: None
YEH closer to the deepening . will cool there column if there west enough from it ...
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's difficult for us to really benefit from a bombing clipper but the gfs is heading in the right direction yet again. It's very close to something much bigger for us, it needs to continue to dig a bit more and I think we could get a solid 3-6" storm. 

its really difficult to benefit if the NAO - PNA and AO are not in a good position - which they are not although they are moving in that direction after this weekend event ALSO  the flow is still too fast with nothing to slow it down so this will be just a very light event .............

 

http://www.cpc.ncep.noaa.gov/products/precip/CWlink/daily_ao_index/ao.shtml

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We need the S/W to dig as much as possible in order to develop a nice CCB and system at our latitude/longitude. I would buy a solution like this more than the hope we cash in on a Norlun. Hopefully the flow can slow down a little so whatever storm does develop doesn't get pushed right out to sea. I would like to see that trough axis a little further west, but if we keep trending to a deeper trough, we might luck out. As is it's a lot more favorable for New England.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We need the S/W to dig as much as possible in order to develop a nice CCB and system at our latitude/longitude. I would buy a solution like this more than the hope we cash in on a Norlun. Hopefully the flow can slow down a little so whatever storm does develop doesn't get pushed right out to sea. I would like to see that trough axis a little further west, but if we keep trending to a deeper trough, we might luck out. As is it's a lot more favorable for New England.

 

It seems tough with the fast northern branch in a Nina pattern for this to amplify close enough to the coast for

other than areas east of the city to really cash in. At least if we had a dominant STJ in  Nino year, this would

have a better chance of bombing closer to the Delmarva than east of New England. But it would be nice

if the Euro ticked a little closer to the coast.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...