Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,588
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    LopezElliana
    Newest Member
    LopezElliana
    Joined

February 2-3 Potential Super Bowl Storm Discussion


Mitchel Volk

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 553
  • Created
  • Last Reply

The negativity in this thread is unreal. Its if people are wish casting a fail because they are bitter about the rest of the winter. This never was going to be a big event like last weeks fail so do not to rip on it. Ill take 2 inches and be happy! After 4.5 inches last week it all adds up and around here this winter is blowing last year away! (we had .5 in the October storm and 1.5 in the January event)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Relying on a Norlun is again, a dangerous road. More likely it's a prolonged period of light snow that adds up over 12 hours or so. If this Norlun doesn't pan out (likely), the precip amounts are likely over done since much of it falls as a result of that Norlun.

 

Well its in the right place at this range, remember, usually sets up a bit northeast of where its often modeled to be...

 

nam-hires_namer_054_1000_500_thick.gif

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sundays system is 1 to 2 inches  and possibly 3 on Long Island . Everyone starts as snow as  temps will be BELOW  freezing and if temps get to 34 - 35  it will be towards the very tail end of the system and that will only occur at the immediate coast .

 

MT HOLLYS AFD is going  with 1-2 throughout all of New Jersey unless one lives in extreme SNJ

The snow will stick , secondary roads will be covered .

Again the European is colder than the GFS and just like the GFS came around to the track with this system 2 days ago it should do so as far as temps go as well .

Link to comment
Share on other sites

These inverted troughs are so incredibly difficult to predict. The NAM is definitely showing the inverted trough enhancement on the simulated radar very well. Wherever this sets up, we could see advisory level snowfall totals.

 

rad51.gif

 

 

It will be interesting to see if we can get an isolated thunder snow report where the band actually sets up.

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The more amplified members of the SREF at 09z (including the ones that give us moderate snow and a big storm to New England) all race the second vortmax south and east through the OV and phase it with the lead piece of energy. If you look at the NAM, this doesn't happen...it isn't particularly close to happening either.

 

If you're looking for a more wrapped up solution, that's what needs to occur. The SREFs...especially the ARW members have not been good the last two weeks. So we'll have to watch the trends over the next few cycles.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It will be interesting to see if we can get an isolated thunder snow report where the band actually sets up.

 

The inverted troughs are so peculiar, especially on models...because they don't happen unless a specific set of things are lined up perfectly. So not only are they difficult to predict even on mesoscale models, but they can sometimes not set up at all.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The inverted troughs are so peculiar, especially on models...because they don't happen unless a specific set of things are lined up perfectly. So not only are they difficult to predict even on mesoscale models, but they can sometimes not set up at all.

 

 Guessing  their exact location a few days out can be like trying to pinpoint summer convection two days in advance.

 The best that we can do is say a general signal is there for a possible one here.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 Guessing  their exact location a few days out can be like trying to pinpoint summer convection two days in advance.

 The best that we can do is say a general signal is there for a possible one here.

 

attachicon.gifScreen shot 2013-02-01 at 10.15.28 AM.png

 

Signal is definitely there but my confidence is extremely low as usual with these types of events. That's not a bad analogy at all regarding the convection. The mid level height field is very different on almost every mesoscale model at this point. Check out some of the SREFs...a huge spread in solutions in regards to the second vort max which slides southeast through the Ohio Valley. That can change the setup drastically in either direction.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What has happened to the MM5?  It seems to me that in the immediate short term (<24 hours), it used to be great for forecasting localized impacts.  But it seems to be really off this year.  Today's system to the south of this sub-forum is a perfect example, as of yesterday's 12Z run it had almost zero precip in NJ and then that's where the heaviest occurs today.  Would think we could be looking at tomorrow's 12Z run of the MM5 and have a pretty good picture of the local precip for Sunday but I have no confidence in it right now.  The RUC, however, did a very good job with today's precip so would look to that starting later tomorrow to maybe nail down the localized impacts for Sunday.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Signal is definitely there but my confidence is extremely low as usual with these types of events. That's not a bad analogy at all regarding the convection. The mid level height field is very different on almost every mesoscale model at this point. Check out some of the SREFs...a huge spread in solutions in regards to the second vort max which slides southeast through the Ohio Valley. That can change the setup drastically in either direction.

 

Yeah, we may not be able to trust the placement of the main features until we get within 12-24 hours of the event.

Kind of a tricky forecast since there will be a lot of travel with the superbowl parties taking place. This may come

right down to tracking the radar as a nowcast special. Further out across the Island up into New England seems

to be the favored spots.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Kind of surprised the gfs doesn't have one, the setup for one is certainly there. From hrs 48 to 54 there should be some sort of extension from the low or the Norlun but again those are extremely difficult to predict. 

 

The soundings have TT's in the 45-50 range across LI with steep mid-level lapse rates.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...