Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,607
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    NH8550
    Newest Member
    NH8550
    Joined

February 15-MOrch possible wintry threats


tombo82685

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 929
  • Created
  • Last Reply

The possible clipper (which reminds me of 1/11/1997) is only about 60 hours away...

 

I was thinking the same system earlier today too, that one was not forecast well at all, I remember they had SE NJ with a chance for some snow but not NYC/LI and we saw 3-4 inches in some places. Both sort of want to form at the base of a front.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I was thinking the same system earlier today too, that one was not forecast well at all, I remember they had SE NJ with a chance for some snow but not NYC/LI and we saw 3-4 inches in some places. Both sort of want to form at the base of a front.

Yeah, that was a pleasant surprise 2.5" back home.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I was thinking the same system earlier today too, that one was not forecast well at all, I remember they had SE NJ with a chance for some snow but not NYC/LI and we saw 3-4 inches in some places. Both sort of want to form at the base of a front.

I was thinking of this system as well, but in the Baltimore suburbs it was forcasted pretty well. Very quick  hitter. Ended up with close to 3. Interesting part of the system was that it started out as a very wet snow and ended as a very dry snow which is pretty impressive for a storm that only lasted about 3 hours. It was cold for a couple days afterward but the following weekend was frigid.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This one came to my mind. I remember it was forecasted right up till the snow was falling to be relatively minor.

 

jan52003r1.gif

 

 

This one was "convective".  Forecaster who missed this was rather steamed. Went back and looked at what went wrong because it looked like a simple clipper.  If something like this has a chance (I'm not back til the weekend) and anyone has Bufkit look for a neutral change of theta e with height in the low levels, hopefully across a couple of models. The nam and some sref members we know can get "excitable".

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...