Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,584
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    LopezElliana
    Newest Member
    LopezElliana
    Joined

February 2013 mid-long range disco thread


Fozz

Recommended Posts

you might be right, and we could get through this period without much to show for it, but isn't it nice to have an stj again, and to see the trough digging to the south and west of us so it is at least possible to get an amplifying system to track just to our southeast versus needing some crazy northern branch interaction or a super clipper to somehow pull off a miracle?  We always need a little luck, we have wasted plenty of great patterns.  People remember 2001/02 as being aweful and it was but even that winter had a 10 day period that was a really nice setup in December and early January but was wasted.  We had 3 really good chances, one ended up supressed just to our south, the second just never came together and ended up a mess and 2-3" for our area, and the last one phased a bit too early and ended up just north of us, PSU got 13".  If one of those three had worked out, we wouldnt remember that year as being so awful.  Luck has a lot to do with it, even in a good pattern.  But I will take my chances on this upcoming pattern over the crap we have been dealing with the last 2 years, that is for sure. 

 

 

It's probably the best PAC pattern we have seen since 1/2011...it just sucks that we probably need a great pattern just to get a modest event...but we are stuck in rotting Nina hell, so c'est la vie

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 2.3k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

It's probably the best PAC pattern we have seen since 1/2011...it just sucks that we probably need a great pattern just to get a modest event...but we are stuck in rotting Nina hell, so c'est la vie

I agree completely, but the numbers don't lie, nina's and neutral after a nina are just flat awful for our area.  Its not really fair to just ignore the influence the Nina pattern has though, that is a part of it, so having that huge negative working against us, means we need a lot of other factors to line up right to offset it.  We are probably saying the same thing here.  I am just following the evolution of this and going to hope for the best. 

 

I still think the 18th is our best shot.  I think the Vday story is legit, and not a total crazy hail mary but it won't have any real cold in front to work with, so similar to the Jan 2011 storm it will require the perfect H5 track and the low to amplify at just the right time.  The track is not far off from where it would need to be though so its a shot, but not a great one.  Following that though, if we can get it to amplify up to our northeast, we will get a fresh injection of colder air, and have a window where odds favor confluence in the right place for us.  It looks like the next storm might come in that window.  Since we do not have a great atlantic pattern, the key is getting a storm to amplify and create a faux -nao type signal for a few days, then get the next system to come in during that window.  If we had a real -nao block then this would be a VERY good pattern coming up. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree completely, but the numbers don't lie, nina's and neutral after a nina are just flat awful for our area.  Its not really fair to just ignore the influence the Nina pattern has though, that is a part of it, so having that huge negative working against us, means we need a lot of other factors to line up right to offset it.  We are probably saying the same thing here.  I am just following the evolution of this and going to hope for the best. 

 

I still think the 18th is our best shot.  I think the Vday story is legit, and not a total crazy hail mary but it won't have any real cold in front to work with, so similar to the Jan 2011 storm it will require the perfect H5 track and the low to amplify at just the right time.  The track is not far off from where it would need to be though so its a shot, but not a great one.  Following that though, if we can get it to amplify up to our northeast, we will get a fresh injection of colder air, and have a window where odds favor confluence in the right place for us.  It looks like the next storm might come in that window.  Since we do not have a great atlantic pattern, the key is getting a storm to amplify and create a faux -nao type signal for a few days, then get the next system to come in during that window.  If we had a real -nao block then this would be a VERY good pattern coming up. 

Unfortunately, there are a lot of "ifs" in that statement.  At least we're not torching like last winter, which is good.  We've had a couple of windows this winter where parts of the area have had minor events, but nothing area wide so far.  With this next window, maybe we can get things more favorable - would love to see a moderate 3-5" event that starts in the early hours of the day, that everyone in our region can enjoy.  Prior to last winter, such an event would seem reachable and reasonable, but last winter and this have left us cynical and feeling like we may as well be asking for a 12-24" snow event when we want a moderate 3-5" snowfall.  

 

So, I'm incredibly cynical, and wouldn't be shocked to come out of the next pattern with nothing.  With it being so crappy over the past two and a half months, it's hard to argue against persistence.  If we had already had one or two moderate, area-wide events this winter, I would be more excited about the upcoming window.  When you hit mid-February, and have had not even a moderate area-wide event, it's hard to imagine that everything will just turnaround at such a late time.  All we can do is hope.  And stop people from creating storm threads 10 days out.  That is ridiculous behavior, something I don't recall happening as much in previous winters.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Euro punts the Vday sys

at least there is no continuity

 

Honestly, no surprise. The entire thing is 100% dependent on the cutter next week leaving something behind @ 500. That won't be resolved for probably 3+ days. My hunch is it does because of the way its evolved on various progs. As the cutter wraps up and starts pulling NW, a vort dives down from the pac nw and joins the party in the cutter's wake. When it's just a single little lagging piece it usually don't work. There's seems to be a good amount of energy to work with but what the heck do i know. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Has a better look overall...probably won't do it..but better than 12z

 

Absolutely. It's still going inland verbatim but that's nothing to worry about....yet....

 

I just want to have the globals lock into the fact that the storm exists. 

 

One bright spot is no pos low in the gl area to screw it all up. I'm standing by my early statement. This is our best chance in a long long time. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Absolutely. It's still going inland verbatim but that's nothing to worry about....yet....

 

I just want to have the globals lock into the fact that the storm exists. 

 

One bright spot is no pos low in the gl area to screw it all up. I'm standing by my early statement. This is our best chance in a long long time. 

Transfers right over us.  Congrats New England I'm guessing.   But again, I know this is not probably going to be the final solution.  Nice to have a storm on the map that has somewhat of a chance.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Transfers right over us.  Congrats New England I'm guessing.   But again, I know this is not probably going to be the final solution.  Nice to have a storm on the map that has somewhat of a chance.

 

It did and it sure could but I'm pretty interested. 500 look better. Vort is much better even though the track is too close. A lot hinges on the position of the cutter once it gets to the maritimes. It's slides just a hair too quick but we're talking inches of space miles into the future. Slow that down a bit and we have a real storm. 

 

If it holds another couple of runs I'll post the 5H side-by-sides. Just putting 12-18 next to each other is a move in the right direction. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

that's last night's 3-day event i think. lock it up.

well... its not just one point in time, if you look at basically 260 hours on it looks about like that the entire time.  What that says to me is the model is having trouble keying on exactly what SW to amplify and details of timing but that we have a nice window where things are favorable.  At this point I am thrilled to have that even. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

well... its not just one point in time, if you look at basically 260 hours on it looks about like that the entire time.  What that says to me is the model is having trouble keying on exactly what SW to amplify and details of timing but that we have a nice window where things are favorable.  At this point I am thrilled to have that even. 

i actually don't take anything in that range at all seriously but it's better than a torch i guess.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

i actually don't take anything in that range at all seriously but it's better than a torch i guess.

To me I have higher confidence then I normally would because it fits with the progression of where we are going in this pattern, plus the MJO phase, and the time of year, especially in a nina type pattern.  The models are simply starting to show what I would expect given the signals.  I guess I just see the ensembles as validation for what I was already expecting.  I was a little quick, thought it would be Feb 5-15th and instead it looks like may be Feb 15-25 but either way I think we do get a window of hope before the door slams shut on us. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...