Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,916
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    simbasad2
    Newest Member
    simbasad2
    Joined

December 19-20 Talking Points - Part 3


earthlight

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 1.2k
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  On 12/17/2010 at 8:16 AM, William said:

Could be wrong, but I think 6z NAM will be a bit better then 0z...we'll see...

I'm seeing this as well. The surface characteristics might be handled better on a meso scale model like the NAM. Globals don't handle situations like that as well. Wonder if the NAM is picking up better sampling off the west.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 12/17/2010 at 8:30 AM, tombo82685 said:

i dont understand this one, bit granted the northern stream is better, but the whole h5 depiction is less amplified, yet we got the same result. The northern stream must solely be doing the work

The PV is so much further NW and the s/w over MT/UT that dives into the OH Valley amplifies the height field.

The changes are once again radical beyond belief as soon as 48 hrs out. Wow.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 12/17/2010 at 8:32 AM, earthlight said:

The PV is so much further NW and the s/w over MT/UT that dives into the OH Valley amplifies the height field.

The changes are once again radical beyond belief as soon as 48 hrs out. Wow.

I mean, it's not even close to the 0z. Each successive run has had wild swings at h5 for the past 36 hours..it's comical at this point.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...