Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,793
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    manaja
    Newest Member
    manaja
    Joined

1/23-24 clipper


Ian

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 776
  • Created
  • Last Reply

I ended up at 1.5", so I could see Dulles being adjusted down a little bit.

Do they ever adjust totals? I know a few times where it was found that measurement protocols were not followed and they were revised, but those were during big storms.

I thought it was a little high too, because my location is usually similar to IAD and it was more like an inch where I am.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

DCA's seasonal snow total is now 0.6 inches, leaving it 1.4 inches behind last season's final total. On the other hand, IAD's seasonal snow total is now 4.0 inches, leaving it 0.3 inches ahead of last season's final total.

Apparently, the Dulles total has been revised down to 1.2 inches for this storm -- http://www.erh.noaa.gov/lwx/events/snowmaps -- so, that would bring IAD's seasonal snow total down to 3.4 inches, leaving it 0.3 inches behind last season's final total. Also, the revision would bring down the IAD snow/precipitation ratio for this storm to 24 to 1.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I posted this on LWX's facebook wall:

DCA measurements are really embarrassing year after year. I realize the FAA is responsible, but since they are official, how long are we going to sit back and just accept the incompetence? Can we refuse to certify these totals? I had 0.9" in Old Town right on the water. You look at other surrounding measurements and it is almost inconceivable that DCA got only 0.4". This was a cold storm for everyone. Even if they got only 0.03" of liquid which is doubtful, only 13:1 ratios?...when everyone got much higher?...seasoned meteorologists south and east of DC got 20:1+ ratios. I realize Sterling isn'r responsible, but I think it is time you all stepped up and did something since this is official data.

Well said. I hope they give it consideration.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well said. I hope they give it consideration.

From what I understand they have looked into it. Obs will be taken at national either way for safety but they could take obs from somewhere within 5 miles. I think one problem is needing two full time observers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

From what I understand they have looked into it. Obs will be taken at national either way for safety but they could take obs from somewhere within 5 miles. I think one problem is needing two full time observers.

Like how Philly's snow site got moved across the river to a park in NJ? Hey, I'm all for that-- measuring at the park yielded Philadelphia two whopper snow totals (23" and 28.5") in 09/10 thy actually were higher than what downtown saw.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

it's not just the location...it is also that snow is not being measured properly at that location...I measured 0.9" 100 yards from the potomac and I never swept...this was settled snow at 8:30 am..I even got over 0.5" on wooden planks over the river walking out to a pier.....How can someone get only 0.4" from 0.03" liquid in that clipper and the 0.03 is probably low anyway

How hard is it to measure snow? 6 hr reports should generally beat honest end-event measurements anyway. No way they got 13:1 ratios last night.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1" for me and DCA had heavier radar returns than I did so go figure(again)

 

28 for my high today and think DCA was 29 so 3 consecutive for DCA that daytimne highs have not hit 30. That's decent and tomorrow should make it 4 straight.

Wonder if we had 4 such in 2009-10 snows or do have to go back to Feb 2007?

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1" for me and DCA had heavier radar returns than I did so go figure(again)

28 for my high today and think DCA was 29 so 3 consecutive for DCA that daytimne highs have not hit 30. That's decent and tomorrow should make it 4 straight.

Wonder if we had 4 such in 2009-10 snows or do have to go back to Feb 2007?

We were in 20s on tue but had a midnight high of 32. If we stay in 20s tomorrow would be three which is longest since Jan 09. Four days below freezing would tie feb 2007 for most recent.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

We were in 20s on tue but had a midnight high of 32. If we stay in 20s tomorrow would be three which is longest since Jan 09. Four days below freezing would tie feb 2007 for most recent.

2/07 was a genuinely good month of winter. Yeah we missed out on the big dog, but at least the sleet storm was interesting and had a high impact on the area.

Clipper on the 7th, sleet storm, snow burst near MLK day, and then the overperforming snow blitz late in the month--- 4 events in a month alongside a consistently cold pattern.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...