Stebo Posted January 20, 2013 Share Posted January 20, 2013 On 1/20/2013 at 2:47 PM, toronto blizzard said: No I'm just saying that he needs to lighten up a little. It's depressing hearing him say stuff like that. Read more and post less. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
snowstormcanuck Posted January 20, 2013 Share Posted January 20, 2013 On 1/20/2013 at 2:52 PM, Harry said: Lighten up? Yet in the second sentence you say it is depressing? Dude just relax and take SSC advice. Don't mind him. He's a WOTY quarter finalist. Par for the course. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chicago WX Posted January 20, 2013 Share Posted January 20, 2013 Can we please stop the back and forth bickering in this thread? Please. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
A-L-E-K Posted January 20, 2013 Share Posted January 20, 2013 It's weenie projection syndrome. I've either nailed or been too bullish on all my calls this year. I'm not sure how any honest observer could say i've been overly pessimistic...especially to the point of making it a grudge. again, WPS Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
snowstormcanuck Posted January 20, 2013 Share Posted January 20, 2013 On 1/20/2013 at 2:54 PM, snowstormcanuck said: Don't mind him. He's a WOTY quarter finalist. Par for the course. I'll see if I can pull up a few of hist posts from last winter and see if he's violated his own "too depressing" standard. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
snowstormcanuck Posted January 20, 2013 Share Posted January 20, 2013 On 1/20/2013 at 2:55 PM, Chicago WX said: Can we please stop the back and forth bickering in this thread? Please. Yessir. Taken to PM. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
toronto blizzard Posted January 20, 2013 Share Posted January 20, 2013 On 1/20/2013 at 2:52 PM, snowstormcanuck said: "people were talking about that because it was so impressive and rare...the current southern solution makes much more sense." - Alek. This gets you depressed? He's making a call. What's the big deal? And I don't see how you could reasonably expect a snow lover to "lighten up" when he's sitting on 1.3" for the season as we're heading into late January. Had we not had that December 27th storm, our posts would be even more hopeless sounding. If it werent for the December storm this winter would be even WORSE than last winter! I can't even believe that I just said that. After last winter I didn't think we'd see a winter that bad for a long time Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
A-L-E-K Posted January 20, 2013 Share Posted January 20, 2013 lol...looking back, even when under a WSW i was too bullish with my calls. Too depressing...'copter Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
michsnowfreak Posted January 20, 2013 Share Posted January 20, 2013 On 1/20/2013 at 2:51 PM, Chicago WX said: Should be a riot when this gets into the NAM's range. MSP to APN hit initially? It's already farther north with Wednesday's little impulse versus the other guidance. Wouldn't go to sleep on that one BTW...just IMHO. I know, right!? Its only a matter of time before extrapolating past 84 hours begins and the clown maps start to appear. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stebo Posted January 20, 2013 Share Posted January 20, 2013 On 1/20/2013 at 3:21 PM, michsnowfreak said: I know, right!? Its only a matter of time before extrapolating past 84 hours begins and the clown maps start to appear. You mean like this...? Btw this post is in jest as I would never use the DGEX to emphasize anything. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chicago WX Posted January 20, 2013 Share Posted January 20, 2013 lol, that'll work. I'll be up north for this potential system. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
michsnowfreak Posted January 20, 2013 Share Posted January 20, 2013 On 1/20/2013 at 3:33 PM, Stebo said: You mean like this...? Btw this post is in jest as I would never use the DGEX to emphasize anything. Ahh the old dgex Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Harry Posted January 20, 2013 Share Posted January 20, 2013 On 1/20/2013 at 3:33 PM, Stebo said: You mean like this...? Btw this post is in jest as I would never use the DGEX to emphasize anything. CT Blizz will be all over that. lol Hell that excites my weenie. :weenie: Too bad it is the DGEX.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chicago WX Posted January 20, 2013 Share Posted January 20, 2013 12z GFS is going to be farther north/more amped up versus its 0z run...comparing them through 81/93 hours. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stebo Posted January 20, 2013 Share Posted January 20, 2013 On 1/20/2013 at 3:56 PM, Chicago WX said: 12z GFS is going to be farther north/more amped up versus its 0z run...comparing them through 81/93 hours. Step in the right direction, although this run was a bit cheap on the QPF. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chicago WX Posted January 20, 2013 Share Posted January 20, 2013 Wholesale changes locally. Fighting liquid in LAF on this run. No blockbuster, as expected, but nice enough for southern WI through MI...and then NE IN/N OH. And here I was so confident last night that it wouldn't cut into OH. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brewers Posted January 20, 2013 Share Posted January 20, 2013 A swath of 4-5 inches across southern WI. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chicago WX Posted January 20, 2013 Share Posted January 20, 2013 OT: maybe I'm late to the party, but the meteocentre model page has a nice model comparison deal on their website (GFS, EC, GGEM, UK for long range and GGEM, RGEM, UK, GFS, NAM for short range). You can see how last night's 0z GFS was a lone wolf at 120 hours. Link here: http://meteocentre.com/models/models.php?mod=compar&map=na&run=00〈=en Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
McDude Posted January 20, 2013 Share Posted January 20, 2013 On 1/20/2013 at 2:47 PM, toronto blizzard said: No I'm just saying that he needs to lighten up a little. It's depressing hearing him say stuff like that. I don't think honesty is depressing. Lightening up would be lying. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chicago WX Posted January 20, 2013 Share Posted January 20, 2013 12 Ukie, 994 right up into MBY. http://meteocentre.com/models/get_panel.php?mod=ukmet&run=12&stn=PNM&map=na〈=en Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stebo Posted January 20, 2013 Share Posted January 20, 2013 On 1/20/2013 at 4:49 PM, Chicago WX said: 12 Ukie, 994 right up into MBY. 12:20 12z UK 120hrs .gif http://meteocentre.com/models/get_panel.php?mod=ukmet&run=12&stn=PNM&map=na〈=en It is consistent in being the Northern most solution, I will give it that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dmc76 Posted January 20, 2013 Author Share Posted January 20, 2013 On 1/20/2013 at 4:49 PM, Chicago WX said: 12 Ukie, 994 right up into MBY. 12:20 12z UK 120hrs .gif http://meteocentre.com/models/get_panel.php?mod=ukmet&run=12&stn=PNM&map=na〈=en Harry's wet dream Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chicago WX Posted January 20, 2013 Share Posted January 20, 2013 12z GGEM 1003 in southern IL at 108 hours...1000 far southern OH at 114 hours. Which is a slight step south versus its 0z run. http://meteocentre.com/models/explorateur.php?lang=en&map=na&run=12&mod=gemglb&stn=PNM&comp=1&run2=12&mod2=gemglb&stn2=PNM&hh2=108&fixhh=1&hh=114 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stebo Posted January 20, 2013 Share Posted January 20, 2013 On 1/20/2013 at 4:58 PM, Chicago WX said: 12z GGEM 1003 in southern IL at 108 hours...1000 far southern OH at 114 hours. http://meteocentre.com/models/explorateur.php?lang=en&map=na&run=12&mod=gemglb&stn=PNM&comp=1&run2=12&mod2=gemglb&stn2=PNM&hh2=108&fixhh=1&hh=114 Makes a hard left to Erie at 120hr Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chicago WX Posted January 20, 2013 Share Posted January 20, 2013 FWIW, post system LES signal for Chicago is pretty strong on the 12z GGEM. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dmc76 Posted January 20, 2013 Author Share Posted January 20, 2013 On 1/20/2013 at 4:59 PM, Stebo said: Makes a hard left to Erie at 120hr That solution would be a dream hit for Detroit Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Powerball Posted January 20, 2013 Share Posted January 20, 2013 On 1/20/2013 at 5:07 PM, dmc76 said: That solution would be a dream hit for Detroit Not really. This GEM run is very GFS-esque. 2-4", something but nothing special. Now the UKMET on the other hand... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
toronto blizzard Posted January 20, 2013 Share Posted January 20, 2013 On 1/20/2013 at 5:08 PM, Powerball said: Not really. This GEM run is very GFS-esque. 2-4", something but nothing special. Now the UKMET on the other hand... FWIW the 12z GEFS mean is further north than the OP Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hm8 Posted January 20, 2013 Share Posted January 20, 2013 On 1/20/2013 at 5:07 PM, dmc76 said: That solution would be a dream hit for Detroit Actually really dry verbatim. .1-.4" QPF Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
toronto blizzard Posted January 20, 2013 Share Posted January 20, 2013 On 1/20/2013 at 5:11 PM, toronto blizzard said: FWIW the 12z GEFS mean is further north than the OP http://raleighwx.americanwx.com/models/gfsensemble/12zgfsensemblep12120.gif Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.