Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,862
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    Malmax64
    Newest Member
    Malmax64
    Joined

January 25-26 Storm Potential


powderfreak

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 2.2k
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  On 1/24/2013 at 2:58 AM, CoastalWx said:

As We Thought.

 

Oh lol thanks. So assuming the models remain mostly unchanged and there are no further ticks NW, does BOS stand to see an inch or two from this? Or is it still most likely a total whiff? Still need to educate myself on the models.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 1/24/2013 at 2:52 AM, Typhoon Tip said:

Exactly, which is why NCEP schedules G4 drop sonde missions during higher stakes scenarios - it's because the assimilations schemes are SO dependable   :arrowhead:

no...they do it to improve them. that's not the point.

 

do you know that over 90% of the data that goes into NWP is satellite derived? my point on this is the satellite data is good. there's no questions. it's very good. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 1/24/2013 at 3:01 AM, Bostonseminole said:

dude, what makes no sense?  it was pretty clear already.. you used the world tickle.. I asked why everyone was using the word tickle and they said CTblizz made it a fad.. that's it.

 

 

Forget it - I'm a moron.  I didn't see the point of what was going on.  sorry

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 1/24/2013 at 3:04 AM, Tropopause_Fold said:

no...they do it to improve them. that's not the point.

 

do you know that over 90% of the data that goes into NWP is satellite derived? my point on this is the satellite data is good. there's no questions. it's very good. 

 

 

Well, yeah I agree there.  When I have brought it up in the past it wasn't for trying to dream up a better scenario out of data sparseness.  I think we're probably talking about the same thing actually 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 1/24/2013 at 3:12 AM, Tropopause_Fold said:

the nam really keeps all the good stuff offshore. the GFS had a much more favorable look.

 

 

It does, BUT, it deepening much fast and is slightly closer at 60 hours ... probably because the S/W dynamics are just tickling the west coast of N/A 

 

 

ah hahahaahahahah

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 1/24/2013 at 3:14 AM, HubbDave said:

Not the biggest fan of the bigger Canadian labels...but they are ok.

heck, back in the day we used to pound the heinous Black Labels...

-1.7F

 

 

Way back in the day we pounded Falstaff, Hefenreffer, Dawson, Balantine and Gansett...........lol

Link to comment
Share on other sites

RGEM is out, here's what I saw:

The 0z weakened the energy running along the border. Look at the 522 line 48h 12z vs 36h 0z. The flow has lifted north somewhat in conjunction. Ridging out west is a little less. It's a little less moist in the origination area for the storm. I don't see anything in that model run that makes me think we're going to see a jump in the GGEM beyond bringing it into the fold possibly of the Euro/GFS blend.

  On 1/24/2013 at 3:17 AM, ORH_wxman said:

RGEM pretty meh....I thought it regressed slightly from its 12z/18z look.

Yeah, that's my take too. Nothing to see there that would make one expect a huge surprise from the GGEM.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...