Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,588
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    LopezElliana
    Newest Member
    LopezElliana
    Joined

January 25-26 Storm Potential


powderfreak

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 2.2k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

You know what I think it is? I think pros have become so meh....so non-specific and obtuse...I think some are trying to change that and actually offer forecasts beyond 24-36 hours instead of possibilities.  Problem is they picked a terrible time to do it with the more reliable models stinking it up.

 

I miss Mark Rosenthal and Bob Copeland too.   Watching the noon newscasts it's like watching people trying not to be wrong vs forecasting.  Maybe, if, we'll keep an eye on it, possibly, etc etc.  Very little talk of what actually is happening, lots of fluff, and CYA.

 

I am happy Noyes and Kelly are going for it long as they don't become Big Joe.  I'd rather have that than the pros telling me the 15 things that might happen but not the 1 they think is most likely until the cirrus is moving in.

i disagree with most of this. but to each his own. then again, i literally don't watch any TV outside of sports (and with 2 kids that rarely works out well)  so perhaps that's the going trend on TV...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You know what I think it is? I think pros have become so meh....so non-specific and obtuse...I think some are trying to change that and actually offer forecasts beyond 24-36 hours instead of possibilities.  Problem is they picked a terrible time to do it with the more reliable models stinking it up.

 

I miss Mark Rosenthal and Bob Copeland too.   Watching the noon newscasts it's like watching people trying not to be wrong vs forecasting.  Maybe, if, we'll keep an eye on it, possibly, etc etc.  Very little talk of what actually is happening, lots of fluff, and CYA.

 

I am happy Noyes and Kelly are going for it long as they don't become Big Joe.  I'd rather have that than the pros telling me the 15 things that might happen but not the 1 they think is most likely until the cirrus is moving in.  To be clear this isn't aimed at anyone.  I just think looking around the landscape there's very few that are actively sticking their necks out now for fear of busting.  I think overall the forecasting in Boston has really gone down hill with Drag leaving and guys like Barry, Bob C, Mark etc going off into the sunset. 

 

 

Its silly to "stick your neck out" in a forecast that has low certainty and a lead time of several days.

 

You pick your spots to stick your neck out...I'm not sure why the huge fetish in having "balls" or "guts" for making a forecast at 72 hours that has a huge chance in busting. What it does it reduce that person's credibility.

 

 

Just my 0.02.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Having misspoke, the temperature near the ground (alone) has virtually nothing to do with snowfall ratios. Snow growth is another consideration, but given that we're looking at a pretty cold vertical profile to and above 700mb, I think it's safe to say snowfall ratios are pretty good.

 

For IJD, the percent probability for a 15:1 or greater ratio is 97% from NAM and 89% from GFS.
http://sanders.math.uwm.edu/cgi-bin-snowratio/sr_timeetc.pl?site=IJD

Link to comment
Share on other sites

i disagree with most of this. but to each his own. then again, i literally don't watch any TV outside of sports (and with 2 kids that rarely works out well)  so perhaps that's the going trend on TV...

 

The comments about the wild forecasts were mainly about TV mets in Boston, so it was mainly about TV mets yes.   When Harv and Barry retire there's nobody on Boston tv I'd turn to for weather.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Its silly to "stick your neck out" in a forecast that has low certainty and a lead time of several days.

 

You pick your spots to stick your neck out...I'm not sure why the huge fetish in having "balls" or "guts" for making a forecast at 72 hours that has a huge chance in busting. What it does it reduce that person's credibility.

 

 

Just my 0.02.

 

 

Like the box map from i think it was yesterday for the friday storm, That was pretty ballsy

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Isn't a neutral or slight -PNA better for SWFE?

 

Well the stronger a trough out west, the better chance for a low to head west so be careful what you  wish for. It also depends on the NAO...is there blocking? Also, is there ridging in AK? Is it poleward enough?

 

Next week as a pretty good trough, but some confluence to our northeast too. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Its silly to "stick your neck out" in a forecast that has low certainty and a lead time of several days.

 

You pick your spots to stick your neck out...I'm not sure why the huge fetish in having "balls" or "guts" for making a forecast at 72 hours that has a huge chance in busting. What it does it reduce that person's credibility.

 

 

Just my 0.02.

 

Will it's not about putting out specific totals etc.  It's about not even really outlining what may happen.  I gather you don't watch much TV in the Boston market, it's really taken a depressing turn.   we don't really ever get accumulation maps now, we get the automated products that seem to be never close to right that the mets mostly totally discount WHILE they are showing them. 

 

I know that's not the market we're in now, ratings dictate a dumbing down of the forecast product and pretty graphics.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Like the box map from i think it was yesterday for the friday storm, That was pretty ballsy

 

I know how hard this field is so I'm careful about criticizing..but at the same time...don't diminish my credibility and lump me into these "mets" category because they make wild forecasts. That's why I get bothered by it. Like Will said, it ruins the credibilty. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I wonder if the dry air will eat up a lot of this snow. The mid level RH fields are saturated with weak lift too. I swear 7-8/10 times this produces some snow when QPF is not really showing it.

 

This isn't a weenie statement...just something I keep seeing on the models. Soundings do have dry air below 850, but still....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...