Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,587
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    LopezElliana
    Newest Member
    LopezElliana
    Joined

January 25-26 Storm Potential


powderfreak

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 2.2k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

NCEP says take a 12z Euro and 12z GFS compromise, that seems like the sensible approach for right now.

 

HOWEVER...THE 12Z ECMWF LOOKS QUESTIONABLE EARLY ACROSS THE WEST
COAST ON WED IN BREAKING OFF A PIECE OF THE INCOMING SHORTWAVE
TROUGH TO THE SOUTH AND MERGING IT INTO THE SERN PACIFIC CLOSED
CLOSED LOW. THIS RESULTS IN A LESS ROBUST NRN STREAM TROUGH
REACHING THE NRN PLAINS. THERE IS STILL ENOUGH AMPLIFICATION OF AN
UPSTREAM RIDGE OVER THE NRN PLAINS AND INTERACTION WITH SHORTWAVE
ENERGY IN SRN CANADA THOUGH TO PRODUCE AN AMPLIFYING TROUGH EAST
OF THE MISS RIVER...SIMILAR BUT WEAKER THAN THE 00Z ECMWF.
THEREFORE...BELIEVE THE 12Z ECMWF IS REASONABLE AFTER 12Z FRI.

WHILE THE 12Z CMC IS STILL MORE AMPLIFIED WITH THE UPPER TROUGH AS
IT CROSSES THE MISS RIVER...DO NOT FEEL COMFORTABLE GOING FULL ON
TOWARD THE WEAKER NCEP GUIDANCE...AND WILL CONTINUE TO PREFER A
12Z GFS / 12Z ECMWF BLEND WHICH IS A REASONABLE COMPROMISE WITH
AGREEMENT BY THE GEFS/EC MEANS AS THE SYSTEM REACHES THE EAST
COAST

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks. I have my moments. Let's hope I continue to have my moments through the first half of Feb.

 

It was a pretty sick snowfall for 20-30 minutes last night.

 

I still find it hilarious that this storm was being modeled and argued (friday storm) by mets to be a north / interior track.

 

 

Yeah, I don't recall anyone in this particular subforum thinking that.   I thought QVector' and wxwatcher91 were actually discussing the 26th as being the more favorable out of the 22nd vs - 

 

I started that thread on good faith for last night's system but it was predicated on the relaxation of the flow ... that, dun dun dunnn, never took place.  It's left me in a bit of consternation as to how we are going to get it done when the SPV fills, the EPO and NAO are neutralized, and we still end up with enough speed in the flow to move a trough from west of Minnesota to off the upper MA in one day flat.   That is the singular fluid dynamical reason why the phase takes all the way to S of NS before being meaningful.  

 

As it were, the flow is finally relaxing as that stupid beast lifts out, but the runs with progressivity as their middle names are holding onto that agenda at least excuse imaginable.   While those that try some semblance of equity are fighting against it - 

 

Basically, it's because progressivity, while often described in context of a bias, does in fact at times exist;  flows sometimes end up longitudinal in character.   One thing, the PNA at Climate Pred. Center is forecast to go to 0 or even slightly negative SD over the next week ... before [perhaps] resuming an impressive rise as we head into February (the latter looks mighty MJO rooted... )  Normally that should mean even money as far as the flow orientation over the Conus, but ... sufficed it is to say, it is not a positive PNA, so some flatness is acceptable.  

 

Or it could all just be a coincidence, sure.   

 

One last thing, fwiw - the entire governing package of dynamics is all out over the Pacific O right now.  Assimilation has come a long way, but still ...even in this day and age, once in a while we see eastern N/A system morphology increase upon sampling in the denser grid over land, once a system is finally relayed from off the Pacific.  IF a stronger Pac/intermediate impulse is injected into the flow, it will definitely cause more latitudinal exertion on the field, and that might be the ticket in getting more N stream caught up in the gravity well.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah, I don't recall anyone in this particular subforum thinking that.   I thought QVector' and wxwatcher91 were actually discussing the 26th as being the more favorable out of the 22nd vs - 

 

I started that thread on good faith for last night's system but it was predicated on the relaxation of the flow ... that, dun dun dunnn, never took place.  It's left me in a bit of consternation as to how we are going to get it done when the SPV fills, the EPO and NAO are neutralized, and we still end up with enough speed in the flow to move a trough from west of Minnesota to off the upper MA in one day flat.   That is the singular fluid dynamical reason why the phase takes all the way to S of NS before being meaningful.  

 

As it were, the flow is finally relaxing as that stupid beast lifts out, but the runs with progressivity as their middle names are holding onto that agenda at least excuse imaginable.   While those that try some semblance of equity are fighting against it - 

 

Basically, it's because progressivity, while often described in context of a bias, does in fact at times exist;  flows sometimes end up longitudinal in character.   One thing, the PNA at Climate Pred. Center is forecast to go to 0 or even slightly negative SD over the next week ... before [perhaps] resuming an impressive rise as we head into February (the latter looks mighty MJO rooted... )  Normally that should mean even money as far as the flow orientation over the Conus, but ... sufficed it is to say, it is not a positive PNA, so some flatness is acceptable.  

 

Or it could all just be a coincidence, sure.   

 

One last thing, fwiw - the entire governing package of dynamics is all out over the Pacific O right now.  Assimilation has come a long way, but still ...even in this day and age, once in a while we see eastern N/A system morphology increase upon sampling in the denser grid over land, once a system is finally relayed from off the Pacific.  IF a stronger Pac/intermediate impulse is injected into the flow, it will definitely cause more latitudinal exertion on the field, and that might be the ticket in getting more N stream caught up in the gravity well.   

:ee:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Won't matter its the Nam and it will be wrong no matter what it has

 

Yeah it's just kind of funny to see that s/w down deep in California.

 

but

 

"HOWEVER...THE 12Z ECMWF LOOKS QUESTIONABLE EARLY ACROSS THE WEST

COAST ON WED IN BREAKING OFF A PIECE OF THE INCOMING SHORTWAVE

TROUGH TO THE SOUTH AND MERGING IT INTO THE SERN PACIFIC CLOSED

CLOSED LOW."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Right now, opinion is toss everything, it all seems to vary so much from run to run, this combined with the record that the models have this winter and I;m not even going to try to make some sort of a call until stuff starts to come together. Toss everything from 12z, toss everything coming up at 18z, look at trends at 0z, toss everything coming up at 6z, and tomorrow at 12z we should have a better idea of the picture one way or another. Not saying that the 12z EURO/GFS solution is impossible, in fact I think it's more likely than the 00z KU on the EURO, but it's just too up in the air right now to even think about making a forecast/prediction.

 

Enjoy the model mayhem and see you at 12z tomorrow!

 

-skisheep

Link to comment
Share on other sites

seems like the nam is trying to do just that

Yeah it's just kind of funny to see that s/w down deep in California.

 

but

 

"HOWEVER...THE 12Z ECMWF LOOKS QUESTIONABLE EARLY ACROSS THE WEST
COAST ON WED IN BREAKING OFF A PIECE OF THE INCOMING SHORTWAVE
TROUGH TO THE SOUTH AND MERGING IT INTO THE SERN PACIFIC CLOSED
CLOSED LOW."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

seems like the nam is trying to do just that

 

It's the NAM...but it's kind of funny.  It's weaker than the 12z at 60-66 hours for sure.  Hopefully it does the Euro left hook towards the end, or manages to pull it all together UK style.

 

I haven't looked to see what extent the Euro does the energy drop like NCEP talked about, to be honest at this range I don't care.  But kind of curious the NAM follows it right after.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's been that type of pattern...one of these has to hit that area and work out.

Well it's already caused Nantucket to beat me in the seasonal total lol. But it's good to see them getting snow. They kind of got hosed even in '10/'11 when we got buried. In a way, this pattern reminds me of the 80s.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Motto of this forum this Winter is "We TOSS!" and the Mascot is :axe:

 

18z NAM says "we whiff"

 

 

Hybrid solution of the other models, not exciting.  A disjointed piece of heartbreak.  Maybe good for Phil and Ack.  Those guys have to be the favorite right now in my book, but we'll see.  It's trying the last minute hook of the Euro.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's been that type of pattern...one of these has to hit that area and work out.

when you say Eastern MA are we talking Boston and Metro west area our Cape and Islands.  Cause the argument could be made that the last two events have really worked out well for the cape and islands as they now have more seasonal snow than the 128 corridor.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

when you say Eastern MA are we talking Boston and Metro west area our Cape and Islands. Cause the argument could be made that the last two events have really worked out well for the cape and islands as they now have more seasonal snow than the 128 corridor.

Well could be Cape Cod. Weenies relax, I just said "could be."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Is that true?

Sorry I was out for a few hours. I believe it is, but don't have official totals or anything. BOS has 7.4".

 

ACK had 4" on Friday morning, and multiple reports of 6+ there last night, so that alone puts them at 10". Pretty said...everyone in all directions of BOS is beating them ...again. Although 7.4" isn't accurate as you have what, 14"? And Scott had like 10-11"?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sorry I was out for a few hours. I believe it is, but don't have official totals or anything. BOS has 7.4".

ACK had 4" on Friday morning, and multiple reports of 6+ there last night, so that alone puts them at 10". Pretty said...everyone in all directions of BOS is beating them ...again. Although 7.4" isn't accurate as you have what, 14"? And Scott had like 10-11"?

Yeah in a hole, but plenty of time to make up.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...