Thrasher Fan Posted January 16, 2013 Share Posted January 16, 2013 For the N GA crew. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BIG FROSTY Posted January 16, 2013 Share Posted January 16, 2013 If I lived between Asheville, Boone, to Danville, maybe Richmond corridor, I'd be getting a little nervous and maybe checking out the trees around my house tomorrow. 2 to 3" per hour snow rates of wet snow is nothing to mess around with. I don't see this lasting as long as Mar 09. Thundersnow? Yes! For some areas. Hope everyone who gets hit enjoys the snow without the aggravation. I'm looking for mostly rain this go around in my area, unless the temps really come down more than shown. Robert you have been on top of this potential storm, really enjoy your web site for all the hard work you put into it! Thanks for keeping us ahead of the storms!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Marion_NC_WX Posted January 16, 2013 Share Posted January 16, 2013 Here's the authors' take on the low snow totals in the lee of the mountains in NC during that March 2009 event: Apparently, they are still not sure why the northern foothills missed out on the snow. It wasn't due to downsloping, according to their analysis. Since BL temps are so marginal in this upcoming event as well, I must confess that I am a little worried that we might experience a similar phenomenon as occurred during this March 2009 event: If the surface temps aren't able to cool enough, we could be staring at the remnants of melted snowflakes (i.e., rain) as they smack into the ground. Maybe my memory is not good but it just seemed like the precip rates in the March 2009 system IMBY wasn't that heavy. I'm still inclined to think the rates and the dynamics had a lot to do with the amounts that fell along the NC/SC line and the lack of snow here in McDowell County. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wncsnow Posted January 16, 2013 Share Posted January 16, 2013 If I lived between Asheville, Boone, to Danville, maybe Richmond corridor, I'd be getting a little nervous and maybe checking out the trees around my house tomorrow. 2 to 3" per hour snow rates of wet snow is nothing to mess around with. I don't see this lasting as long as Mar 09. Thundersnow? Yes! For some areas. Hope everyone who gets hit enjoys the snow without the aggravation. I'm looking for mostly rain this go around in my area, unless the temps really come down more than shown. Do you think the same phenomena that left much of the northern and central foothills with little accumulation in the March 1st ULL could once again cut down potential on anything significant along the escarpment? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LithiaWx Posted January 16, 2013 Share Posted January 16, 2013 Any sounding info for the North Georgia area? Allan's map shows an inch or so but I'm wondering if it would actually be snow. For us.. Yes. Hour z45 is a clear snow sounding. Looks like if we get the deformation band the gfs shows we will get a short period if snow on the tail end. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BIG FROSTY Posted January 16, 2013 Share Posted January 16, 2013 FWIW---CMC not too snowy east of the mountains! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tnweathernut Posted January 16, 2013 Share Posted January 16, 2013 FWIW---CMC not too snowy east of the mountains! I hate looking at maps on my iPhone, but it looks like the NAM and GFS for the mountains of NC and NE TN at a quick glance Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IWC Posted January 16, 2013 Share Posted January 16, 2013 Robert you have been on top of this potential storm, really enjoy your web site for all the hard work you put into it! Thanks for keeping us ahead of the storms!!! Hey Frosty, I have to agree. Robert has always done a great job on the storms in the SE. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wow Posted January 16, 2013 Share Posted January 16, 2013 Not sure if you remember it but 2/19/99 could be similar, also. Yes I do remember that one. Got a nice little thump of snow out of it. Got out of Econ class for that one. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ColdRainsStr8cashhomey Posted January 16, 2013 Share Posted January 16, 2013 since folks are mentioning the march 09 storm as an analog... there are some big differences in the thermal profile (Delta will back me up on this because he was here in Greenville at the time) I remember the March of 09 storm and cold-core well because I probably spent 20-hours a day for 5 days looking at models prior to that storm and forecasting it for the Upstate of SC ... the 09 cold-core was way more expansive than this one is projected and was quite a bit colder due to the 500mb vort being stronger (-2C to -4C at 5000ft - at least in the Upstate of SC)... interesting to note that areas of northeast GA (Toccoa area) which were around 0C to 1C at 850mb (warm pocket) got nothing other than a cold rain during the 09 storm while it may be a good analog as far as the ULL track, there was also a weak surface wedge present in March of 09 which helped with colder low-level temps in CAD areas the heavy rates and ULL track do look similar, but one noticeable difference I can see with this storm compared to March of 09 is the cold-core is less expansive and not as cold... also, as "Alchemist" made mention of, there was some initial snow enhancement for a short time at 3000ft-5000ft or so in the form of east to west winds upsloping near the areas of Chimney Rock, Asheville, Hendersonville and Saluda NC as the 850mb low closed off due south of the these areas and wrapped in a ESE to E wind into the cold air... had to be some impressive rates in those areas as the 850mb low shifted ENE and some slightly colder air wrapped in at 5000ft Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Huffwx Posted January 16, 2013 Share Posted January 16, 2013 CMC is always warm, not weenie talk. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HKY_WX Posted January 16, 2013 Share Posted January 16, 2013 Here's the authors' take on the low snow totals in the lee of the mountains in NC during that March 2009 event: Apparently, they are still not sure why the northern foothills missed out on the snow. It wasn't due to downsloping, according to their analysis. Since BL temps are so marginal in this upcoming event as well, I must confess that I am a little worried that we might experience a similar phenomenon as occurred during this March 2009 event: If the surface temps aren't able to cool enough, we could be staring at the remnants of melted snowflakes (i.e., rain) as they smack into the ground. We still had like 7 inches from that storm. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BIG FROSTY Posted January 16, 2013 Share Posted January 16, 2013 I hate looking at maps on my iPhone, but it looks like the NAM and GFS for the mountains of NC and NE TN at a quick glance Yes, It looks good for mountains and your area in NE TN Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shawn Posted January 16, 2013 Share Posted January 16, 2013 00z GFS Soundings for Columbia, SC: During precip (towards the end): Precip has pretty much ended: 00z NAM Raw Text (precip stops after 48): Station ID: KCAE Lat: 33.94 Long: -81.11 NAM Model Run: 0Z 16JAN 2013 HR Valid 2m Tmp 2m Dpt 10m Dir 10m Spd TPrcp CPrcp 1000-500 500mb 850mb 500mb MSLP TCC PRS WX Tot Snowfall Vis Deg F Deg F deg kt in. in. Thk GPH Tmp Tmp mb % TEXT Clouds in SM 0 01/16 00Z 66 56 168 2 0.00 0.00 566 582 11.4 -7.5 1017 39 334SCT334 0.0 15.0 3 01/16 03Z 64 59 159 7 0.00 0.00 565 580 11.8 -7.8 1017 54 370BKN283 0.0 15.0 6 01/16 06Z 61 60 173 11 0.00 0.00 566 580 12.3 -7.8 1016 39 150SCT150 0.0 15.0 9 01/16 09Z 61 60 183 10 0.00 0.00 565 579 12.1 -8.1 1016 100 000OVC093 0.0 13.4 12 01/16 12Z 61 61 196 9 0.00 0.00 565 579 12.2 -8.7 1016 100 000OVC011 0.0 0.0 15 01/16 15Z 65 60 212 12 0.00 0.00 565 580 12.1 -8.3 1017 88 063BKN123 0.0 15.0 18 01/16 18Z 67 58 225 12 0.00 0.00 565 578 11.1 -7.4 1016 95 -RA 061BKN192 0.0 14.4 21 01/16 21Z 63 60 211 9 0.11 0.00 564 577 11.4 -8.2 1015 100 -RA 040OVC144 0.0 8.3 24 01/17 00Z 62 60 207 7 0.05 0.00 564 578 11.9 -8.7 1015 94 085BKN088 0.0 15.0 27 01/17 03Z 59 58 209 5 0.00 0.00 564 577 11.5 -8.5 1015 0 CLR 0.0 14.2 30 01/17 06Z 58 58 187 3 0.00 0.00 564 576 11.0 -8.5 1014 10 014FEW102 0.0 12.9 33 01/17 09Z 59 59 178 5 0.02 0.02 563 574 11.2 -9.3 1013 82 084BKN154 0.0 16.1 36 01/17 12Z 59 59 185 8 0.00 0.00 562 573 12.4 -10.5 1012 78 049BKN062 0.0 10.0 39 01/17 15Z 66 61 185 11 0.00 0.00 561 572 11.2 -11.7 1012 100 099OVC134 0.0 15.1 42 01/17 18Z 68 61 191 15 0.08 0.07 560 567 10.7 -12.6 1008 100 TSRA 022OVC308 0.0 2.5 45 01/17 21Z 60 57 240 12 0.41 0.00 556 563 5.3 -14.8 1007 100 RA 013OVC176 0.0 3.8 48 01/18 00Z 49 46 309 12 0.17 0.01 546 555 1.3 -10.0 1010 100 -RA 009OVC115 0.0 9.4 None looks good for Columbia for anything Wintry. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BIG FROSTY Posted January 16, 2013 Share Posted January 16, 2013 CMC is always warm, not weenie talk. Yes, Just thought I would throw it out there! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tnweathernut Posted January 16, 2013 Share Posted January 16, 2013 Yes, Just thought I would throw it out there! I am glad you did. Most modeling coming inboard with a nice little system for some. Question is..........what will the euro show and I'd it doesn't fully come on board are we beyond its skill in being under 3 days? Some would say turn to short range models. I say I'd rather have the euro in my camp irregardless of time. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FoothillsNC Posted January 16, 2013 Share Posted January 16, 2013 here's some images from March 09, just for comparison's sake. Back then, the upper low was 546dm core in Missouri Bootheel then deepened to 3 contours and 540 at its core as it rounded the trough in Georgia. Overall, this one coming up isn't progged as deep cutoff, consequently it can't get as cold as that 540 core. But the overall way the cutoff goes from Texas and then curves into central GA and offshore NC is pretty good analog still. The deformation band forecast from 48 hours on GFS back then was very close to this one, just not as extensive. UVV is actually similar, but this next storm is probably just east of that 2009 storm and hits central NC to eastern VA harder on the new progs. We'll see if the models make a deeper cutoff or keep it closed even longer..they could still. 2009 was substantially colder as well on the backside, but oddly enough the temps under deformation banding was barely supportive, like this one. We'll see. 2009: 2013: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stovepipe Posted January 16, 2013 Share Posted January 16, 2013 Yes, Just thought I would throw it out there! I am glad you did. Most modeling coming inboard with a nice little system for some. Question is..........what will the euro show and I'd it doesn't fully come on board are we beyond its skill in being under 3 days? Some would say turn to short range models. I say I'd rather have the euro in my camp irregardless of time. Gotta admit, it would be nice to have the Doc on my team with this. Twill be fun to watch regardless. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bhamwx205 Posted January 16, 2013 Share Posted January 16, 2013 I'm showing the samething Jon. Where do you get the text data Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
packbacker Posted January 16, 2013 Share Posted January 16, 2013 The snowfall map for the 4km HWRF is similar to the GFS, roughly 2-4" for central NC, close to 6 at NC border towards RIC. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GaffneyPeach Posted January 16, 2013 Share Posted January 16, 2013 2009 was substantially colder as well on the backside, but oddly enough the temps under deformation banding was barely supportive, like this one. We'll see. That's what I said about my roof during that storm! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jon Posted January 16, 2013 Share Posted January 16, 2013 Where do you get the text data For free here: http://wxcaster.com/models_text.htm but it takes a while after the model to complete running to upload the new txt file. I get mine from Accuweather Pro as the model is coming out. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bhamwx205 Posted January 16, 2013 Share Posted January 16, 2013 For free here: http://wxcaster.com/models_text.htm but it takes a while after the model to complete running to upload the new txt file. I get mine from Accuweather Pro as the model is coming out. Cool thanks Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
griteater Posted January 16, 2013 Share Posted January 16, 2013 Where do you get the text data The soundings come out pretty quick during the model run from Plymouth - http://vortex.plymouth.edu/grbsnd.html Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jon Posted January 16, 2013 Share Posted January 16, 2013 Euro is rolling...lets see what he brings... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dsaur Posted January 16, 2013 Share Posted January 16, 2013 here's some images from March 09, just for comparison's sake. Back then, the upper low was 546dm core in Missouri Bootheel then deepened to 3 contours and 540 at its core as it rounded the trough in Georgia. Overall, this one coming up isn't progged as deep cutoff, consequently it can't get as cold as that 540 core. But the overall way the cutoff goes from Texas and then curves into central GA and offshore NC is pretty good analog still. AnimationGFS500mbMarch1_2_2009Snowstorm.gif The deformation band forecast from 48 hours on GFS back then was very close to this one, just not as extensive. UVV is actually similar, but this next storm is probably just east of that 2009 storm and hits central NC to eastern VA harder on the new progs. We'll see if the models make a deeper cutoff or keep it closed even longer..they could still. 2009 was substantially colder as well on the backside, but oddly enough the temps under deformation banding was barely supportive, like this one. We'll see. 2009: gfsdefamation48.gif 2013: now.gif The one two years before came thru around Columbus too, if I remember correctly. With the same results, at least around here. And colder also, but maybe not as much? I know the ground temps were ridiculous, but the heavy fall gave us some sticking for the afternoon, or at least 3 or 4 hours. Tony Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jon Posted January 16, 2013 Share Posted January 16, 2013 Euro stronger @ 36 with the sfc low at 1012mb over GA...wetter at 42 with lots of QPF NW SC, W NC... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jon Posted January 16, 2013 Share Posted January 16, 2013 @48hrs...plows CLT with QPF but not cold enough, although colder at 850mb slightly, more of NC has a chance this run....northern foothills and mountains get some snow at hr54, 850s crash by 54 over most of NC but it's probably a cold chasing moisture scenario. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
packbacker Posted January 16, 2013 Share Posted January 16, 2013 Euro stronger @ 36 with the sfc low at 1012mb over GA...wetter at 42 with lots of QPF NW SC, W NC... It's colder than 12z but not quite as good as NAM/GFS, probably a sloppy inch for RDU, VA/NC border probably a few inches. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AirNelson39 Posted January 16, 2013 Share Posted January 16, 2013 Lots of QPF for WNC but only "some" snow for mountains? Are you saying euro is saying mostly rain for mountains then?? @48hrs...plows CLT with QPF but not cold enough, although colder at 850mb slightly, more of NC has a chance this run....northern foothills and mountains get some snow at hr54, 850s crash by 54 over most of NC but it's probably a cold chasing moisture scenario. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.