Dsnowx53 Posted January 15, 2013 Share Posted January 15, 2013 That is a classic KU potential. The shortwave is going neutral at the Mississippi Valley and amplifying. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IsentropicLift Posted January 15, 2013 Share Posted January 15, 2013 Okay, I agreed that it was a nice setup. I just thought it was pre-mature to predict a KU. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Allsnow Posted January 15, 2013 Share Posted January 15, 2013 Okay, I agreed that it was a nice setup. I just thought it was pre-mature to predict a KU. I did not predict anything. I stated that run screams ku at 240 hr. It's agreed on by a good amount of respected mets/posters on this board. I'm sorry you mis-read my post Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
friedmators Posted January 15, 2013 Share Posted January 15, 2013 SUNY MM5 has a lot of frozen precip on it for route 78 and north. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
allgame830 Posted January 15, 2013 Share Posted January 15, 2013 What is your location? My location is Hawthorne ny... North of I-287 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ag3 Posted January 15, 2013 Share Posted January 15, 2013 MM5 is the coldest model right now. Hour 21 of the 12z run has it cold enough for KLGA. At that hour, the best precip is over that area: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ag3 Posted January 15, 2013 Share Posted January 15, 2013 80%+ chance of frozen for northern Queens, NYC and North shore of LI at hour 21: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IsentropicLift Posted January 15, 2013 Share Posted January 15, 2013 18Z NAM keeps the 850 freezing line right around I-80 until about 15z. Then it moves north into Upstate NY. 0.50-0.75" falls before that. Total precip now exceeds 0.75" from about I-95 SE. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IsentropicLift Posted January 15, 2013 Share Posted January 15, 2013 Per the NAM bufkit if taken verbatim at KMMU, 1.1" of snow followed by 0.20" of ice. Keeps surface temps below 32 for a couple hours longer than 12z. 130116/0500Z 11 04006KT 34.2F SNPL 0:1| 0.0|| 0.00|| 0.00|| 0.026 0:1| 0.0|| 0.00|| 0.00|| 0.03 6| 87| 6130116/0600Z 12 06007KT 32.8F RAIN 0:1| 0.0|| 0.00|| 0.00|| 0.071 0:1| 0.0|| 0.00|| 0.00|| 0.10 0| 0|100----------------------------------------------+----++-----+-------------++--------------++-------------++-----------+---+---130116/0700Z 13 05007KT 32.3F RAIN 0:1| 0.0|| 0.00|| 0.00|| 0.071 0:1| 0.0|| 0.00|| 0.00|| 0.17 0| 0|100130116/0800Z 14 05007KT 31.7F SNPL 1:1| 0.1|| 0.10|| 0.00|| 0.061 1:1| 0.1|| 0.10|| 0.00|| 0.23 18| 82| 0130116/0900Z 15 04009KT 31.0F SNPL 5:1| 0.4|| 0.04|| 0.00|| 0.068 3:1| 0.5|| 0.14|| 0.00|| 0.30 68| 32| 0130116/1000Z 16 05007KT 30.8F SNPL 4:1| 0.4|| 0.10|| 0.00|| 0.100 4:1| 0.9|| 0.25|| 0.00|| 0.40 48| 52| 0130116/1100Z 17 06007KT 30.6F FZRA 0:1| 0.0|| 0.00|| 0.05|| 0.046 4:1| 0.9|| 0.25|| 0.05|| 0.44 0| 0|100130116/1200Z 18 03005KT 31.0F SNPL 5:1| 0.2|| 0.04|| 0.00|| 0.046 4:1| 1.1|| 0.29|| 0.05|| 0.49 54| 46| 0----------------------------------------------+----++-----+-------------++--------------++-------------++-----------+---+---130116/1300Z 19 05006KT 31.0F FZRA 0:1| 0.0|| 0.00|| 0.04|| 0.037 4:1| 1.1|| 0.29|| 0.09|| 0.53 0| 0|100130116/1400Z 20 04006KT 31.2F FZRA 0:1| 0.0|| 0.00|| 0.00|| 0.003 4:1| 1.1|| 0.29|| 0.09|| 0.53 0| 0|100130116/1500Z 21 05006KT 31.4F FZRA 0:1| 0.0|| 0.00|| 0.07|| 0.070 4:1| 1.1|| 0.29|| 0.16|| 0.60 0| 0|100130116/1600Z 22 08004KT 31.7F FZRA 0:1| 0.0|| 0.00|| 0.03|| 0.033 4:1| 1.1|| 0.29|| 0.20|| 0.63 0| 0|100130116/1700Z 23 35005KT 32.1F FZRA 0:1| 0.0|| 0.00|| 0.00|| 0.009 4:1| 1.1|| 0.29|| 0.20|| 0.64 0| 0|100130116/1800Z 24 33005KT 32.8F RAIN 0:1| 0.0|| 0.00|| 0.00|| 0.005 4:1| 1.1|| 0.29|| 0.20|| 0.65 0| 0|100----------------------------------------------+----++-----+-------------++--------------++-------------++-----------+---+---130116/1900Z 25 32004KT 33.2F RAIN 0:1| 0.0|| 0.00|| 0.00|| 0.006 4:1| 1.1|| 0.29|| 0.20|| 0.65 0| 0|100 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IsentropicLift Posted January 15, 2013 Share Posted January 15, 2013 Euro vs GFS The NAM also has mostly rain for the city and freezing rain for the I-287 folks. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ericjcrash Posted January 15, 2013 Share Posted January 15, 2013 Euro vs GFS Everything vs, Euro. maybe throw the MM5 in the Euros court but even that differs, Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MJO812 Posted January 15, 2013 Share Posted January 15, 2013 Looks like the clipper is redevloping on the coast at 156 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Allsnow Posted January 15, 2013 Share Posted January 15, 2013 Looks like the clipper is redevloping on the coast at 156 Yes. Light snow in the area early Monday morning. Temps look to be in upper 20's Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Allsnow Posted January 15, 2013 Share Posted January 15, 2013 Gfs says miller b snowstorm monday Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kaner587 Posted January 15, 2013 Share Posted January 15, 2013 the 18z GFS shows our best case scenario(pretty much) for the clipper/miller B threat. Looks like a low thickness event where we would actually be able to get some solid ratios. My fingers are crossed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Allsnow Posted January 15, 2013 Share Posted January 15, 2013 Man would love to lock that in. Temps fall through 20's during the storm Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ace0927 Posted January 15, 2013 Share Posted January 15, 2013 HM has a post in the Phl thread about the ku setup on 12z euro HM has a post in the Phl thread about the ku setup on 12z euro and its not such a positive one.. "I posted this over in the NE subforum and wanted it here too WRT the ECMWF run: Is it time to sound the KU alarms for Jan 25-27? The window here would open if the ECMWF is correct in lifting the entire polar vortex into the North Atlantic. The GFS is more robust in bringing down the blocking (down as in strat-->tropo and AO-->NAO) and holding the vortex in place instead of shifting out. Now the Jan 20-25 period will be a time, stratospherically, when anomalies will be squeezed through the N Atlantic-UK pipeline in an area of high PV. Is it possible the whole damn Arctic Source/tropo PV goes for the ride too? My early thoughts are that it ...gulp...won't move out quite that fast and the blocking will continue to trend stronger toward the 25th. While we can definitely see snow events during this period, I'm not sold yet on the ECMWF KU setup....but eventually the threat will become real." and there is a follow up one that says he is more confident on the snowy pattern being in early feb... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SnowGoose69 Posted January 15, 2013 Share Posted January 15, 2013 The eventual location of the re-developing low if it happens will probably be between the GFS and Euro, the Euro is probably too far north and the GFS probably too far south due to cold bias. These events historically give nothing to DC, Philly can do so-so and usually from NYC north does well. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Allsnow Posted January 15, 2013 Share Posted January 15, 2013 -510 line is over city during hight of storm. Man would be a sundog dream storm Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CooL Posted January 15, 2013 Share Posted January 15, 2013 the 18z GFS shows our best case scenario(pretty much) for the clipper/miller B threat. Looks like a low thickness event where we would actually be able to get some solid ratios. My fingers are crossed. Disagree. That vort really digs. If it closes off the storm can tuck into the coast and we get a lot more snow. Only takes a few minor changes Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Allsnow Posted January 15, 2013 Share Posted January 15, 2013 and its not such a positive one.. "I posted this over in the NE subforum and wanted it here too WRT the ECMWF run: Is it time to sound the KU alarms for Jan 25-27? The window here would open if the ECMWF is correct in lifting the entire polar vortex into the North Atlantic. The GFS is more robust in bringing down the blocking (down as in strat-->tropo and AO-->NAO) and holding the vortex in place instead of shifting out. Now the Jan 20-25 period will be a time, stratospherically, when anomalies will be squeezed through the N Atlantic-UK pipeline in an area of high PV. Is it possible the whole damn Arctic Source/tropo PV goes for the ride too? My early thoughts are that it ...gulp...won't move out quite that fast and the blocking will continue to trend stronger toward the 25th. While we can definitely see snow events during this period, I'm not sold yet on the ECMWF KU setup....but eventually the threat will become real." and there is a follow up one that says he is more confident on the snowy pattern being in early feb... How is that not positive? He stated might be rushing the ku pattern, snow could still fall during this time frame. A lot more encouraging then what has gone on so far. We don't often see ku patterns to often Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SnowGoose69 Posted January 15, 2013 Share Posted January 15, 2013 Disagree. That vort really digs. If it closes off the storm can tuck into the coast and we get a lot more snow. Only takes a few minor changes The Miller Bs are dangerous as far as room for error, you sometimes want a positive NAO and just the insanely huge ridge out west which we have here, if you have the -NAO the pattern can slow down too much and the redevelopment occurs too far west...see 12/14/89 for that scenario. I usually like taking my chances with just a big western ridge and not too blocked up a pattern with Miller Bs. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kaner587 Posted January 15, 2013 Share Posted January 15, 2013 Disagree. That vort really digs. If it closes off the storm can tuck into the coast and we get a lot more snow. Only takes a few minor changes thats true...but im making an assumption we don't see those "minor changes," but I do acknowledge the possibility obviously. And just as much as it could trend snowier it could easily end up more like the euro, although in this type of pattern I think the result is closer to the GGEM/GFS Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CooL Posted January 15, 2013 Share Posted January 15, 2013 The Miller Bs are dangerous as far as room for error, you sometimes want a positive NAO and just the insanely huge ridge out west which we have here, if you have the -NAO the pattern can slow down too much and the redevelopment occurs too far west...see 12/14/89 for that scenario. I usually like taking my chances with just a big western ridge and not too blocked up a pattern with Miller Bs. Yeah but i don't think this thing can cut west if there's decent confluence in se canada. It can hug the jersey coast and we'd still get snow Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CooL Posted January 15, 2013 Share Posted January 15, 2013 thats true...but im making an assumption we don't see those "minor changes," but I do acknowledge the possibility obviously. And just as much as it could trend snowier it could easily end up more like the euro, although in this type of pattern I think the result is closer to the GGEM/GFS Yup. Agreed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Allsnow Posted January 15, 2013 Share Posted January 15, 2013 Gfs gives us another snowstorm at the end of next week. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SnoSki14 Posted January 15, 2013 Share Posted January 15, 2013 The gfs looks very nice, with high ratios we could easily see even a MECS in this setup. It's like winter officially arrives late Sunday with the arctic front, it looks cold with a ton of snow possibilities and even KU's perhaps going forward. Could we be looking at a historic winter transformation from Dec to mid January and from mid January through February? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CooL Posted January 15, 2013 Share Posted January 15, 2013 The shortwave that dives in on the backside is a beast Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kaner587 Posted January 15, 2013 Share Posted January 15, 2013 The gfs looks very nice, with high ratios we could easily see even a MECS in this setup. It's like winter officially arrives late Sunday with the arctic front, it looks cold with a ton of snow possibilities and even KU's perhaps going forward. Could we be looking at a historic winter transformation from Dec to mid January and from mid January through February? -qbo favors this midwinter transition. I think we do quite well from her on out Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SnoSki14 Posted January 15, 2013 Share Posted January 15, 2013 -qbo favors this midwinter transition. I think we do quite well from her on out And starting Monday, this winter will likely leave last winter in the dust. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.