Semper911 Posted January 21, 2013 Share Posted January 21, 2013 If you haven't seen these, check out these pics -- Congrats Russia. http://rt.com/news/winter-snow-russia-weather-275/ Here's a sample: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
weatherwiz Posted January 21, 2013 Share Posted January 21, 2013 That's Russia? I would have guessed that's the entrance to Kevin's. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mfastx Posted January 21, 2013 Share Posted January 21, 2013 I hope Boston's not in the screw zone like always lol. I can see us getting about 2 inches if I'm lucky. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FSUIZZY Posted January 21, 2013 Share Posted January 21, 2013 I hope Boston's not in the screw zone like always lol. I can see us getting about 2 inches if I'm lucky. Oh get ready to be screwed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SlantStickers Anonymous Posted January 21, 2013 Share Posted January 21, 2013 I need to move to Russia. Lol WBZ tweets sum this up pretty well "these events are about as forecastable as the northern lights" oh and then "in these set ups a narrow area can get 1-2 feet while 2 miles away gets 2 inches" Fun stuff. Still hopeful. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
N. OF PIKE Posted January 21, 2013 Share Posted January 21, 2013 HPC snow probs issued around 1230 (shld be an update soon) but they favor E MA (not nh/maine) http://www.hpc.ncep.noaa.gov/pwpf/wwd_accum_probs.php have bos in 70% plus for 4 + inches. subject to change also other HPC graph issued at 230pm shows over 40% probs for bos getting greater than 8 inches! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
It's Always Sunny Posted January 21, 2013 Share Posted January 21, 2013 Oh get ready to be screwed. Nobody is screwed it's just the way the system is set up. Screwed is when you're lined up to get 8" and only end up with 3". Norlun trough will screw most if they think it's setting up over them. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dendrite Posted January 21, 2013 Share Posted January 21, 2013 SREFs shift more east. Back to the game. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CT Rain Posted January 21, 2013 Share Posted January 21, 2013 SREFs shift more east. Back to the game. Yup. SREFs now in pretty good agreement with the globals now. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Clinch Leatherwood Posted January 21, 2013 Share Posted January 21, 2013 SREFs shift more east. Back to the game. This will probably produce less snow on the cape than the low a few days ago??? Srefs are terrible this winter Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
weathafella Posted January 21, 2013 Share Posted January 21, 2013 I thought the srefs looked fine for ENE including Boston. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tropopause_Fold Posted January 21, 2013 Share Posted January 21, 2013 This will probably produce less snow on the cape than the low a few days ago??? Srefs are terrible this winter imo, this will be more. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Clinch Leatherwood Posted January 21, 2013 Share Posted January 21, 2013 imo, this will be more. I've only looked at a couple of data points most is interpolation of what's said here which ranges from epic blizzard to a torch . I hope you are right Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CT Rain Posted January 21, 2013 Share Posted January 21, 2013 imo, this will be more. Yeah I still like the look of this for the Cape and Islands. The rest of us aren't in the best spot lol. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nzucker Posted January 21, 2013 Share Posted January 21, 2013 Yeah I still like the look of this for the Cape and Islands. The rest of us aren't in the best spot lol. The 4-8"/WSW might be a little high though. I just don't see widespread warning criteria snows with this set-up. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ginx snewx Posted January 21, 2013 Share Posted January 21, 2013 imo, this will be more. Yea that a strong in close signal now from SRI to the Cape. The signal to me that seems to be missed is the moist flow that develops out of the south and SW in those coastal areas. Seen those get pretty prolific, would not be surprised on a 4-6 somewhere in there. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CT Rain Posted January 21, 2013 Share Posted January 21, 2013 The 4-8"/WSW might be a little high though. I just don't see widespread warning criteria snows with this set-up. I am expecting 3"-6" for the Cape and far NE Mass (Cape Ann through Newburyport). The remainder of E Mass generally 1-3. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TalcottWx Posted January 21, 2013 Share Posted January 21, 2013 Someone post 4 panel sref Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CT Rain Posted January 21, 2013 Share Posted January 21, 2013 Yea that a strong in close signal now from SRI to the Cape. The signal to me that seems to be missed is the moist flow that develops out of the south and SW in those coastal areas. Seen those get pretty prolific, would not be surprised on a 4-6 somewhere in there. The models have actually been showing that. Some weenie flakes from KHVN-KEWB way ahead of the main batch. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
weathafella Posted January 21, 2013 Share Posted January 21, 2013 The 4-8"/WSW might be a little high though. I just don't see widespread warning criteria snows with this set-up. Agree. I wonder if its w reaction for under calling the event this week in the immediate Boston area. Non weenies were shocked upon awakening Wednesday. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CT Rain Posted January 21, 2013 Share Posted January 21, 2013 The SREFS cut WAYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYY back across central and western areas from 15z to 21z. AWT. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ginx snewx Posted January 21, 2013 Share Posted January 21, 2013 The models have actually been showing that. Some weenie flakes from KHVN-KEWB way ahead of the main batch. new Nam shows it well Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nzucker Posted January 21, 2013 Share Posted January 21, 2013 I wonder if New London County up through the hills of NW RI could do well in this set-up...there's some SE inflow ahead of the storm that may cause a period of upslope in RI. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NorEastermass128 Posted January 21, 2013 Share Posted January 21, 2013 Well that sucks. Hoping for some good news in here Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CT Rain Posted January 21, 2013 Share Posted January 21, 2013 NAM continues to show 2 like jackpot areas with enhanced low level convergence... one over the Cape and another on the NH Seacoast up into York Co ME. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
weathafella Posted January 21, 2013 Share Posted January 21, 2013 Here ya go Jay.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
weathafella Posted January 21, 2013 Share Posted January 21, 2013 BOS probably 3+ per nam. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CT Rain Posted January 21, 2013 Share Posted January 21, 2013 BOS probably 3+ per nam. Yeah probably about 3 I'd say given ratios. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SR Airglow Posted January 21, 2013 Share Posted January 21, 2013 and in 24 hours the NAM goes from 4-6 inches to dryslot for me. This is why the NAM is garbage Good luck to all futher east, I'll take my inch and be happy, now on to friday. -skisheep Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tropopause_Fold Posted January 21, 2013 Share Posted January 21, 2013 fdaflkdsjfkla;sdj!!! that's all. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.